World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814436137_0016Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
Abstract:

Fred was far from being a religious man, not in the conventional sense at least. His position, as far as I could assess, was that if there were a cosmic creator it would be scarcely conceivable that any of the world's religions would have fully grasped either His intent or His plan. A degree of incompleteness in comprehending such matters must necessarily remain. I believe he kept an open mind, as I did, and regarded “creation”, in some form, as being a valid intellectual position to hold in relation to the origin of life. He was also cynical of the ambivalent scientific attitude that prevailed in relation to this whole question: whilst it was considered untenable for “creation” to be used in connection with life, it was perfectly acceptable to contemplate that an entire Universe, with all its inherent laws, suddenly came into existence some 13.75 billion years ago, created to all intents and purposes. If Fred and I ever discussed “creation” or a “creator” we did so only as an abstract concept free of any specific Judeo–Christian implications…