World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

CHAPTER 7: Heckscher–Ohlin Trade Flows: A Re-appraisal

    Originally published in Trade and Development Review, 1(1), (2008), pp. 1–6.

    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813200678_0007Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    Abstract:

    The famous Leontief paradox compared the factor proportions used in a country’s export sectors with those used in that country’s import-competing sectors in order to conclude whether a country was relatively capital abundant (in a two-factor, labor, and capital setting). When examined in a two-factor, many commodity setting, this procedure reveals the troubling conclusion that as a country’s relative capital endowment rises, its export sector relative to its import-competing sector cycles from being labor-intensive to being capital-intensive, to being labor-intensive, etc., which serves to invalidate the Leontief procedure.