World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

A NOVEL IMPROVED AND SYNTHESIZED EVALUATION MODEL FOR MULTI-METRICS

    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814759687_0012Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    Abstract:

    Assume that there are p samples and q metrics, which also means the data has q dimensions. For those original accurate data, we employ the normalization method to transfer them into numbers ranging from -1 to +1; for those indicators which cannot be presented as a number, we apply the man-made scoring: -1, -0.5, 0, +0.5, +1in five levels. Then separately, we performed Analytic Hierarchy Process and Maximum Entropy Model on these secondary data. By multiplying the weight and the correlation coefficient, Level 3 data is obtained. Finally, the Principal Component Analysis is carried out, and we can derive the function between the original data and the evaluation result. However, the connection is quite unstable if any data changes significantly. So we put forward a feedback system, which evaluates the final result (as a number) to be a new original data. Apparently, this model still has some contingencies. In order to evaluate the error, we establish an implicit relationship between the original data and the final results by Artificial Neural Networks Principals. Compared the simulation without previous results, one may conclude that our model is robust and valid under most circumstances. Finally, we can work out the error percentage of our evaluation model.