Regular Research PaperFree Access

Towards Nonlinearity in the Entrepreneurial Process: The Entrepreneurial S-Curve Perspective

Mary Han

Ted Rogers School of Management, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5G 2C3, Canada

https://doi.org/10.1142/S021849582450002XCited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Is the entrepreneurial process static? Is the process from idea to fruition on a linear trajectory and similar for all startups? Extant literature has documented four or five stages from startup to decline but paid little attention to undulations. Accounting for the dynamic nature of business and competition, we employ an S-curve perspective, integrate possibilities along the entrepreneurial (ENT) process to explain its nonlinearity and propose strategies to maximize performance. These strategies depict what we term “entrepreneurial S-curve” and are drawn from resource-based views, dynamic capabilities, and network perspectives. We explore the importance of less attended pre-startup stage, linking stage-specific risks and undulations to relevant strategic choices. In so doing, we present a holistic view, both defensively and offensively, for strategic formulation.

Keywords:

References

Aldrich, H. (1989). Networking among women entrepreneurs. Women-owned Businesses, eds. O. Hagan, C. Rivchun and D. Sexton . Praeger, New York, pp. 103–132. Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations Evolving. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E. (2001). Who wants to be an evolutionary theorist? Remarks on the occasion of the year 2000. OMT distinguished scholarly career award presentation. J. Manag. Inq. 10(2) :115–127. Crossref, Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. and Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Res. Organ. Behav. 8 :165–198. Google Scholar
Bamford, C. E., Dean, T. J. and Douglas, T. J. (2004). The temporal nature of growth determinants in new bank foundings: Implications of new venture research design. J. Bus. Ventur. 19(6) :899–919. Crossref, Google Scholar
Bamford, C. E., Dean, T. J. and McDougall, P. P. (2000). An examination of the impact of initial founding conditions and decisions upon the performance of new bank start-ups. J. Bus. Ventur. 15(3) :253–277. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage. 17(1) :99–120. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. and Arikan, A. M. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, eds. M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman and J. Harrison . Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA, pp. 124–188. Google Scholar
Blyler, M. and Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(7) :677–686. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Brännback, M. and Carsrud, A. (2002). A service marketing approach to high technology innovations management. Information Technology Enabled Global Customer Service, ed. T. Reponen . Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 124–142. Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R. and Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Manage. J. 47(6) :795–817. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Bruton, G. D. and Rubanik, Y. (2002). Resources of the firm: Russian high-technology start-ups, and firm growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 17(6) :553–576. Crossref, Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Crossref, Google Scholar
Cao, H. and Folan, P. (2012). Product life cycle: The evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950–2009. Prod. Plan. Control 23(8) :641–662. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Carsrud, A. L., Gaglio, C. M. and Olm, K. (1987). Entrepreneurs — mentors, networks, and successful new venture development: An exploratory study. Am. J. Small Bus. 12(2) :13–18. Crossref, Google Scholar
Carsrud, A., Olm, K. and Thomas, J. (1989). Predicting entrepreneurial success: Effects of multi-dimensional achievement motivation, levels of ownership, and cooperative relationships. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 1(3) :237–244. Crossref, Google Scholar
Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B. and Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. J. Bus. Ventur. 11(3) :151–166. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M. (1992). Exploring the limits of the technology s-curve. Part i: Component technologies. Prod. Oper. Manag. 1(4) :334–357. Crossref, Google Scholar
Companys, Y. E. and McMullen, J. S. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurs at work: The nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Bus. Econ. 301–322. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Corner, P. D., Singh, S. and Pavlovich, K. (2017). Entrepreneurial resilience and venture failure. Int. Small Bus. J. 35(6) :687–708. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Coviello, N. E. and Munro, H. J. (1995). Growing the entrepreneurial firm: Networking for international market development. Eur. J. Mark. 29(7) :49–61. Crossref, Google Scholar
Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P. (1990). New venture strategic, posture, structure and performance: An industry lifecycle analysis. J. Bus. Ventur. 5(2) :123–135. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P. and Covin T. J. (1990). Content and performance of growth-seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high- and low-technology industries. J. Bus. Ventur. 5(6) :391–412. Crossref, Google Scholar
Dacin, M. T., Hitt, M. A. and Levitas, E. (1997). Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of US and Korean firms. J. World Bus. 32(1) :3–16. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Google Scholar
Delmar, F. and Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and survival of new ventures. J. Bus. Ventur. 19(3) :385–410. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 21(10/11) :1105–1121. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Crossref, Google Scholar
Galanakis, K. and Giourka, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial path: Decoupling the complexity of entrepreneurial process. Int. J. Entrepreneurial Behav. Res. 23(2) :317–335. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., Carter, N. M. and Reynolds, P. D. (2004). Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Business Creation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Crossref, Google Scholar
Gartner, W., Starr, J. and Bhat, S. (1999). Predicting new venture survival: An analysis of “anatomy of a start-up.” cases from Inc. Magazine. J. Bus. Ventur. 14(2) :215–232. Crossref, Google Scholar
Gelderen, M. V., Thurik, R. and Bosma, N. (2005). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Bus. Econ. 24 :365–380. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78 :1360–1380. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 82 :929–964. Google Scholar
Hakansson, H. and Snehota I. (eds.) (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks. Routledge, London. Google Scholar
Han, M. (2006). Developing social capital to achieve superior internationalization: A conceptual model. J. Int. Entrepreneurship 4(2–3) :99–112. Crossref, Google Scholar
Han, M. (2008). Achieving superior international new venture (INV) performance: Exploiting short-term duration of ties. J. Enterprising Cult. 16(1) :43–77. Link, Google Scholar
Han, M. (2012). Antecedents of organizational ambidexterity: Towards cognitive ambidexterity capability reasoning. Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual Meetings, Vol. 2012. USA. Crossref, Google Scholar
Han, M. and Celly, N. (2007). Pro-Profit? Pro-Growth? or Both? Strategic ambidexterity and performance in international new ventures (INV). Best Paper Proceedings of the Sixty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, ed. G. T. Solomon, Vol. 2007 (1), pp. 1–6. Google Scholar
Han, M. and Celly, N. (2008). Strategic ambidexterity and performance in international new ventures. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 25 :335–349. Crossref, Google Scholar
Han, M. and McKelvey, W. (2008). Toward a social capital theory of technology-based new ventures as complex adaptive systems. Int. J. Account. Inf. Manag. 16(1) :3–61. Google Scholar
Han, M. and McKelvey, B. (2016). How to grow successful social entrepreneurship firms? Key ideas from complexity theory. J. Enterprising Cult. 24(3) :243–280. Link, Google Scholar
Hanks, S. H., Watson, C. J., Jansen, E. and Chandler, G. N. (1993). Tightening the life cycle construct: A taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high technology organizations. Entrep.: Theory Pract. 18(2) :5–29. Crossref, Google Scholar
Hannan M. T. and Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49(2) :149–164. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hansen, E. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organizational growth. Entrep. Theory Pract. 19(4) :7–19. Crossref, Google Scholar
Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P. and Shepherd, D. A. (2007). Entrepreneurship, 6th edn. The McGraw-Hill Publishing, New Delhi. Google Scholar
Hite, M. J. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrep. Theory Pract. 29(1) :113–144. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. and Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Manage. J. 44(1) :13–28. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L. and Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad. Manage. J. 43(3) :449–467. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, D. R., Camp, S. M. and Sexton, D. L. (2002). Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Blackwell, Oxford. Crossref, Google Scholar
Hoang, H. and Antoncic, D. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. J. Bus. Ventur. 18(2) :165–187. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hofer, C. W. and Sandberg, W. R. (1987). Improving new venture performance: Some guidelines for success. Am. J. Small Bus. 12(1) :11–26. Crossref, Google Scholar
Howarth, J. (2023). Startup failure rate statistics 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/startup-failure-stats. Google Scholar
Hymer, S. H. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
Jirásek, M. and Bílek, J. (2018). The organizational life cycle: Review and future agenda. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 22(3) :1–18. Crossref, Google Scholar
Johanson, J. and Mattson, L. G. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems: A network approach. Strategies in Global Competition, eds. N. Hood and J. Vahlne . Croom Helm, London, pp. 287–314. Google Scholar
Johansson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 8(1) :23–32. Crossref, Google Scholar
Jones, O. and Conway, S. (2004). Social-embeddedness and geographical reach in entrepreneurial networks: The case of James Dyson in international entrepreneurship. Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Orientation, Environment and Strategy, ed. H. Etemad . Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA. Google Scholar
Karniouchina, E. V., Carson, S. J., Short, J. C. and Ketchen, D. J. Jr. (2013). Extending the firm vs. industry debate: Does industry life cycle stage matter? Strateg. Manag. J. 34(8) :1010–1018. Crossref, Google Scholar
Kazanjian, R. K. (1989). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based ventures. Acad. Manage. J. 31(2) :257–279. Crossref, Google Scholar
Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Smith, H., Moore, B. and Wilkison, F. (1998). Internationalisation: Processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms. Small Bus. Econ. 11(4) :327–342. Crossref, Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. (1969). American Business Abroad. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar
Leyden, D. P. and Link, A. N. (2015). Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial process. Small Bus. Econ.: An Entrepreneurship J. 44(3) :475–484. Crossref, Google Scholar
Lund, M. and Nielsen, C. (2018). The concept of business model scalability. J. Bus. Models 6(1) :1–18. Google Scholar
Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(5) :387–401. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Martin, R. E. and Justis, R. T. (1993). Franchising, liquidity constraints and entry. Appl. Econ. 25(9) :1269–1277. Crossref, Google Scholar
McDougall, P. P. and Oviatt, B. M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Acad. Manage. J. 43(5) :902–908. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ocasio, W. and Joseph, J. (2018). The attention-based view of great strategies. Strategy Sci. 3(1) :289–294. Crossref, Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A. III and Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82(4) :74–81. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Oviatt, B. M. and McDougall, P. P. (1995). Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Acad. Manage. Exec. 9(2) :30–44. Google Scholar
Patel, N. (2015). 90% of startups fail: Here’s what you need to know about the 10%, Forbes.com. Retrieved 16 January 2015. Google Scholar
Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York. Google Scholar
Pontus, B., Eklund, J. E. and Per, T. (2021). Taxes, the tax administrative burden and the entrepreneurial life cycle. Small Bus. Econ. 56(2) :681–694. Crossref, Google Scholar
Price, R. (2004). Creating your start-up strategy: Understanding the entrepreneurial life cycle. Roadmap to Entrepreneurial Success: Powerful Strategies for Building a High-profit Business, ed. R. Price . AMACOM Books, New York, pp. 1–14. Google Scholar
Quinn, R. E. and Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Manage. Sci. 29(1) :33–51. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E. S., Madsen, T. K. and Evangelista, F. (2001). The founding of the born global company in Denmark and Australia: Sensemaking and networking. Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist. 13(3) :75–107. Crossref, Google Scholar
Reid, G. and Smith, J. (2000). What makes a new business start-up successful? Small Bus. Econ. 14(3) :165–182. Crossref, Google Scholar
Robinson, K. C. (1999). An examination of the influence of industry structure on eight alternative measures of new venture performance for high potential independent new ventures. J. Bus. Ventur. 14 :165–187. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Rothaermel, F. T. and Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Res. Policy 34(7), 1076–1090. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Russel, R. (1999). Developing a process model of intrapreneurial systems: A cognitive mapping approach. Entrep. Theory Pract. 23(3) :65–84. Crossref, Google Scholar
Sandberg, W. R. and Hofer, C. W. (1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. J. Bus. Ventur. 2(1) :5–28. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A. and Autio, E. (2004). Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 19(6) :809–829. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
Shafiu, A. M., Manaf, H. A. and Muslim, S. (2020). Utilization entrepreneurship for job creation, poverty reduction and national development. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 6(1) :97–102. Google Scholar
Shane, S. (2004). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-opportunity Nexus. Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field. Acad. Manage. Rev. 25(1) :217–226. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Shrader, R. C. and Simon, M. (1997). Corporate versus corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences. J. Bus. Ventur. 12(1) :47–66. Crossref, Google Scholar
Shu, R., Ren, S. and Zheng, Y. (2018). Building networks into discovery: The link between entrepreneur network capability and entrepreneurial opportunity discovery. J. Bus. Res. 85 :197–208. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1990). Bounded rationality. Utility and Probability, pp. 15–18. Crossref, Google Scholar
Simon, M., Houghton, S. M. and Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. J. Bus. Ventur. 15(2) :113–134. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Singh, A., Orsiolli, T. A. E. and Segatto, A. P. (2019). Ecopreneurs and the entrepreneurial life cycle stages: A multicase study in environmental businesses. Rev. Bras. Gest. Neg. 21(3) :522–539. Google Scholar
Smith, N. and Miner, J. (1983). Type of entrepreneur, type of firm and managerial motivation: Implications for organizational life cycle theory. Strateg. Manag. J. 4(4) :325–340. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. H. (1999). A perspective on entrepreneurship. New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur, eds. H. H. Stevenson, M. J. Roberts, H. I. Grousbeck and A. V. Bhide . Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp. 3–17. Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure in organizations. Handbook of Organizations, ed. J. G. March . Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 149–193. Google Scholar
Suarez, F. F., Grodal, S. and Gotsopoulos, A. (2015). Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strateg. Manag. J. 36(3) :437–448. Crossref, Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7) :509–533. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Terpstra, D. E. and Olson, P. D. (1993). Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: A classification of problems. Entrep.: Theory Pract. 17(3) :5–20. Crossref, Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and O’Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA. Crossref, Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. and Engleman, R. M. (2004). Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 19(3) :343–358. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q. J. Econ. 80(2) :190–207. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5(2) :171–180. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A. and Dess, G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26(1) :8–10. Crossref, Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D. and Hitt, A. M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad. Manage. J. 43(5) :925–950. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Korri, J. and Yu, J. F. (2005). Cognitive and international entrepreneurship: Implications for research on opportunity recognition and exploitation. Int. Bus. Rev. 14(2) :129–146. Crossref, Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O. and El-Hagrassey, G. M. (2002). Competitive analysis and new venture performance: Understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrep. Theory Pract. 27(1) :1–28. Crossref, Google Scholar