World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

INTEGRAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE MONODROMY GROUP OF THE HYPERKÄHLER RESOLUTION OF A SYMMETRIC PRODUCT OF A K3 SURFACE

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X10005957Cited by:36 (Source: Crossref)

    Let S[n] be the Hilbert scheme of length n subschemes of a K3 surface S. H2(S[n],ℤ) is endowed with the Beauville–Bogomolov bilinear form. Denote by Mon the subgroup of GL[H*(S[n],ℤ)] generated by monodromy operators, and let Mon2 be its image in OH2(S[n],ℤ). We prove that Mon2 is the subgroup generated by reflections with respect to +2 and -2 classes (Theorem 1.2). Thus Mon2 does not surject onto OH2(S[n],ℤ)/(±1), when n - 1 is not a prime power.

    As a consequence, we get counterexamples to a version of the weight 2 Torelli question for hyperKähler varieties X deformation equivalent to S[n]. The weight 2 Hodge structure on H2(X,ℤ) does not determine the bimeromorphic class of X, whenever n - 1 is not a prime power (the first case being n = 7). There are at least 2ρ(n - 1) - 1 distinct bimeromorphic classes of X with a given generic weight 2 Hodge structure, where ρ(n - 1) is the Euler number of n - 1.

    The second main result states, that if a monodromy operator acts as the identity on H2(S[n],ℤ), then it acts as the identity on Hk(S[n],ℤ), 0 ≤ k ≤ n + 2 (Theorem 1.5). We conclude the injectivity of the restriction homomorphism Mon → Mon2, if n ≡ 0 or n ≡ 1 modulo 4 (Corollary 1.6).

    AMSC: 14J60, 14J28, 14C34, 14C05