World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Centralized Resource Allocation Based on the Bargaining Approach

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595920500499Cited by:7 (Source: Crossref)

    In a centralized decision-making environment, the central unit supervises all the operating units’ production activities and focuses on achieving the overall goals of the entire organization from a global viewpoint by allocating available resources to them. However, all the current models about resource allocation under the centralized decision-making commonly exhibit the non-unique optimal solutions and neglect the competition and trade-off among all the DMUs to maximize the individual aggregated output of each DMU. This phenomenon makes the allocation result imbalanced and unacceptable to all the DMUs. To overcome this problem, this paper introduces Nash bargaining game theory to develop a new centralized resource allocation model which not only takes into account the overall goals of the organization from an overall perspective, but also considers competition and trade-off among all the DMUs. Finally, an empirical example is used to demonstrate the applicability of our proposed approach. The results show that our Nash bargaining game model not only guarantees the uniqueness of the optimal resource allocation results, but also improves the balance of the resource allocation result, which makes it acceptable to all the DMUs.