Research PapersNo Access

EVALUATION OF CHARGED CURRENT NEUTRINO–NUCLEON INTERACTION CROSS-SECTION

K. GANESAMURTHY

Department of Physics, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, Trichy 620019, India

Search for more papers by this author

and

C. HARIHARAN

Department of Physics, J. J. College of Engineering and Technology, Trichy 620009, India

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732308027059Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The charged current neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section is evaluated using Thermodynamical Bag Model (TBM) in the neutrino energy range 1 < E_ν < 200 GeV with the value of the four-momentum transfer squared 0.1 < Q² < 20 GeV² and the Bjorken variable 0.1 < x < 0.5. The hadronic current carries the linear moments of the reaction that depend on the Bjorken scaling variable x as well as the four-momentum transfer. The results obtained have been compared with the experimental values.

Keywords:

PACS: 13.15.+g, 13.60.Hb, 12.39.Ba

References

Particle Data GroupRev. Mod. Phys. 52, S54 (1980). Google Scholar
S. J. Barishet al., Phys. Lett. B 66, 291 (1977). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
S. J. Barishet al., Phys. Rev. D 19, 2521 (1979), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2521. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
P. Bosettiet al., Phys. Lett. B 70, 273 (1977). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
P. Bosettiet al., Phys. Lett. B 110, 167 (1982). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
K. Ganesamurthyet al., Z. Phys. C 52, 589 (1991), DOI: 10.1007/BF01562333. Crossref, ADS, Google Scholar
K. Ganesamurthyet al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9, 3455 (1994). Web of Science, Google Scholar
V. Devanathan and J. S. McCarthy, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11, 147 (1996), DOI: 10.1142/S0217732396000175. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
F. Takagi, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2226 (1987), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.2226. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
F. Takagi, Z Phys. C 37, 259 (1988), DOI: 10.1007/BF01579911. Crossref, Google Scholar
C. Bourrelyet al. et al.et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 487 (2002), DOI: 10.1007/s100520100855. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. Deyet al. et al.et al., Phys. Lett. B 318, 387 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
K. Ganesamurthyet al., Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 37, 363 (1999). Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. Eichtenet al., Phys. Lett. B 46, 274 (1973). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
P. S. Auchinclosset al., Z. Phys. C 48, 411 (1990), DOI: 10.1007/BF01572022. Crossref, Google Scholar
T. Kitagakiet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 98 (1982), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.98. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
V. B. Anikeevet al., Z. Phys. C 70, 39 (1996). Crossref, Google Scholar
A. S. Vovenkoet al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30, 527 (1979). Web of Science, Google Scholar
G. N. Tayloret al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 739 (1983), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.739. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
M. A. Parkeret al., Nucl. Phys. B 232, 1 (1984), DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90358-4. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
E. O'Connor Maher, Minnesota Univ. Fermilab-Thesis-2005-90, UMI-31-92032 (2005) . Google Scholar
W. G. Seligman, Ph.D. Thesis (Columbia University), Nevis Reports 292 (1997) . Google Scholar