Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X24501148Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

An attempt to directly use the synchronous gauge (g0λ=δ0λ) in perturbative gravity leads to a singularity at p0=0 in the graviton propagator. This is similar to the singularity in the propagator for Yang–Mills fields Aaλ in the temporal gauge (Aa0=0). There the singularity was softened, obtaining this gauge as the limit at ε0 of the gauge nλAaλ=0, nλ=(1,ε(jj)1k). Then the singularities at p0=0 are replaced by negative powers of p0±iε, and thus we bypass these poles in a certain way. Now consider a similar condition on nλgλμ in perturbative gravity, which becomes the synchronous gauge at ε0. Unlike the Yang–Mills case, the contribution of the Faddeev–Popov ghosts to the effective action is nonzero, and we calculate it. In this calculation, an intermediate regularization is needed, and we assume the discrete structure of the theory at short distances for that. The effect of this contribution is to change the functional integral measure or, for example, to add nonpole terms to the propagator. This contribution vanishes at ε0. Thus, we effectively have the synchronous gauge with the resolved singularities at p0=0, where only the physical components gjk are active and there is no need to calculate the ghost contribution.

PACS: 04.60.m
You currently do not have access to the full text article.

Recommend the journal to your library today!