Research PaperNo Access

Application of response surface methodology to investigate nano-finishing of the silicon wafer

Mohammad Mosavat

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4131-6901

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave., Tehran 15875-4413, Iran

Search for more papers by this author

and

Abdolreza Rahimi

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave., Tehran 15875-4413, Iran

E-mail Address: rahimi@aut.ac.ir

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979221501344Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The aim of this research is study the effect of polishing factors to the reduction ratio rate in surface roughness (% $Δ Ṙ)$ during the Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (MAF) process using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The parameters studied were machining gap, rotational speed, abrasive size and magnetic abrasive particle (MAP) size. Quadratic models were developed by applying Box–Behnken Design (BBD). Also, experiments were carried out on the silicon wafer and results of surface roughness data were analyzed by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant factors were identified. According to our findings, the maximum % $Δ Ṙ$ value and the best surface roughness of silicon wafer achieved 3.70 and 51 nm, respectively.

Keywords:

PACS: 61.72.Tt

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. J. Xu and K. Xie, Int. J. Modern Phys. B 29, 1540030 (2015). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
2. S. Bin Mansoor and B. S. Yilbas, Int. J. Modern Phys. B 29, 1550112 (2015). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. F. Chen et al., Int. J. Modern Phys. B 31, 1744052 (2017). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
4. Y. Bai et al., Int. J. Modern Phys. B 32, 1850261 (2018). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
5. F. Pashmforoush, A. Rahimi and M. Kazemi, Appl. Optics 54, 8275 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
6. A. Jafari et al., J. Chem. Res. 42, 73 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. N. Belkhir et al., J. Non-Crystal. Solids 357, 2882 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
8. W. Gu, Z. Yao and H. Li, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211, 1629 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. M. Mosavat and A. Rahimi, Wear 424, 143 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. M. Mosavat and A. Rahimi, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 575, 50 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. M. Mosavat et al., Appl. Optics 58, 3447 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
12. M. Mosavat and A. Rahimi, Appl. Optics 58(6), 1569 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
13. F. Pashmforoush and A. Rahimi, Appl. Optics 54, 2199 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
14. F. Pashmforoush and A. Rahimi, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 230, 1498 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. P. Saraeian et al., Mater. Manuf. Process. 31, 2023 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. M. Vahdati and S. Rasouli, Trans. IMF 94, 294 (2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
17. R. Wang et al., J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 32, 2227 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. H. Suzuki et al., Prec. Eng. 11, 197 (1989). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. T. Mori, K. Hirota and Y. Kawashima, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 143, 682 (2003). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. V. Jain, Machining Sci. Technol. 12, 257 (2008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. V. Jain, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 6022 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. R. Moradi et al., Acta Astronautica 151, 487 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
23. G. M. Barzegar et al., Vacuum 150, 207 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
24. A. Mahyari et al., Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 12, 276 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. M. Mosavat et al., Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 21, 380 (2018). Google Scholar
26. S. Gupta et al., Optimization of process parameters for fabrication of IR aspheric diffractive based on the response surface methodology, in Int. Conf. Fibre Optics and Photonics (Optical Society of America, 2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
27. S. Kumar and A. K. Singh, Appl. Optics 57, 942 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
28. G. M. Barzegar et al., Vacuum 150, 207 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
29. F. Pashmforoush, M. Fotouhi and A. A. D. Sarhan, J. Reinforced Plastics Compos. 37, 155 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. M. Ebrahimi, F. Pashmforoush and C. Gode, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 95 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar