Eco-friendly, nontoxic and high-energy storage materials are very important for flexible electrode materials. Bi₄Ti₃ $O_{12}$ $O_{12}$ lead-free, perovskite phase may prove suitable as filler in composites for electrode materials because of its large spontaneous polarization. We have synthesized Bi₄Ti₃ $O_{12}$ $O_{12}$ /polystyrene (BTO/PS) composites and carried out their structural, morphological and bonding studies with the help of X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), in that order. Dielectric measurements in the broad frequency range of synthesized composites determined by Impedance analyzer. We observed that the dielectric constant of composites increased with filler concentration and decreased with applied field frequency. Bi₄Ti₃ $O_{12}$ $O_{12}$ /PS composites can be good electrode materials.

Keywords:

PACS: 72.80.Tm

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. H. Pan et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 5920 (2017). Crossref, Google Scholar
2. P. Shi et al., J. Alloys Compd. 784, 788 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. M. Zhou et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 8528 (2018). Crossref, Google Scholar
4. Z. Gao et al., Dalt. Trans. 47, 16453 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. H. Yang et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 121908 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
6. A. Yadav et al., Mater. Today Proc. 67, 894 (2022). Crossref, Google Scholar
7. J. Jiang et al., J. Mater. Sci. 8, 295 (2022). Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. L. Martinez and O. Kharissova, Handbook of Ecomaterials, cir.nii.ac.jp (Springer, 2017). Google Scholar
9. A. Yadav et al., Energy Environ. Focus 7, 60 (2023). Crossref, Google Scholar
10. Pottathara and Y. Beeran , Nanomaterials Synthesis: Design, Fabrication and Applications ( Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier, 2019). Google Scholar
11. B. Du and B. Du , Appl. Polym. Dielectr. 28, 1917 (2017), https://doi.org/10.5772/63063. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. X. Huang and P. Jiang , Adv. Mater. 27, 546 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. Q. Li et al., Adv. Mater. 26, 6244 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. K. K. Kar , Handbook of Nanocomposite Supercapacitor Materials I: Characteristics, Vol. 378 (Springer Series in Materials Science, 2020). Crossref, Google Scholar
15. S. Liu et al., Nanoparticles Polym. 8, 45 (2016). Google Scholar
16. Z. B. Pan et al., Ceram. Int. 13, 14667 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Y. Fan et al. 119, 09619 (2015), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09619. Google Scholar
18. S. Adireddy et al., J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 3, 641 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. S. Liu et al., Ceram. Int. 40, 15633 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. P. K. C. Pillai and Rashmi , Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 8, 255 (1980). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. A. Kumar and K. L. Yadav , J. Alloys Compd. 528, 16 (2012). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. W.-F. Su et al., 19, 2343 (2004), doi:10.1557/JMR.2004.0312. Google Scholar
23. B. L. Choudhary et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 536, 168102 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168102. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. B. L. Choudhary et al., Mater. Lett. 304, 130731 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130731. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. N. Zhang et al., RSC Adv. 3, 13740 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
26. V. S. Wadi et al., Sci. Rep. 10, 14924 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. Z. Chen et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48, 030204 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. Z. Chen et al., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 117, 264 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. S. Bhardwaj et al., J. Electron. Mater. 44, 3710 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
30. D. K. Yadav et al., Mater. Today Proc. 02, 327 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.02.327. Google Scholar
31. B. L. Choudhary et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 507, 166861 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166861. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. G. Lal et al., J. Alloys Compd. 828, 154388 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154388. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. R. Vinodh et al., Chin. J. Polym. Sci. (English Ed.) 33, 224 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. W. Li et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 31, 18495 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. D. Prajapati et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 34, 634 (2023). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. J. A. Dias et al., Mater. Res. 21, 5 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. P. Pookmanee, P. Uriwilast and S. Phanichpant , Ceram. Int. 30, 1913 (2004). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. R. Sahu et al., Mater. Lett. X 13, 100116 (2022). Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. D. K. Yadav et al., Macromol. Symp. 399, 2100022 (2021). Google Scholar
40. H. Neumann and G. Arlt , Ferroelectrics 69, 179 (1986). Crossref, ADS, Google Scholar
41. Z. Yu and C. Ang , J. Appl. Phys. 91, 794 (2002). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
42. A. Yadav et al., Macromol. Symp. 399, 2100024 (2021). Google Scholar
43. N. Srivastava et al., Mater. Today Proc. 42, 1657 (2019). Crossref, Google Scholar
44. D. K. Yadav et al., Open J. Compos. Mater. 13, 1 (2022). Google Scholar