Computer VisionNo Access

Research on a Precision and Accuracy Estimation Method for Close-Range Photogrammetry

School of Resources and Environment, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, P. R. China

Henan Engineering Laboratory of Pollution Control and Coal Chemical Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Zhengzhou 451191, P. R. China

E-mail Address: makf@163.com

Search for more papers by this author

Gui-Ping Huang

School of Resources and Environment, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, P. R. China

E-mail Address: huangguiping123@163.com

Search for more papers by this author

Hai-Jun Xu

School of Resources and Environment, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, P. R. China

E-mail Address: xuhaijun@ncwu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Wei-Feng Wang

Zhengzhou Chenway Technology Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou 450000, P. R. China

E-mail Address: 670770681@qq.com

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001419550024Cited by:6 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Precision and accuracy estimation is an important index used to reflect the measurement performance and quality of a measurement system. To reveal the significance and connotations of the precision and accuracy estimation index of a close-range photogrammetry system, several common precision and accuracy estimation methods are proposed. They are explained from a theoretical perspective, and the mechanism of the internal coincidence precision estimation and the external coincidence accuracy estimation are deduced, respectively. Through detailed experimental design and testing, the validity and reliability of the proposed precision and accuracy estimation methods are verified, which provides strong evidence for the quality control, optimization and evaluation of the measurement results from a close-range photogrammetry system. At the same time, it has significance for the further development of precision and accuracy estimation analysis of close-range photogrammetry systems.

Keywords:

References

1. J. S. Association, International vocabulary of metrology-Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. Iso/iec Guide (2007). Google Scholar
2. Y. T. Fei, Error Theory and Data Processing, 6th edn. (Mechanical Industry Press, Beijing, China, 2010), pp. 94–116. Google Scholar
3. K. Fekete and P. Schrott, Qualification of close range photogrammetry cameras by average image coordinates RMS error vs. object distance function, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf. Sci. 37 (B5) (2008) 149–152. Google Scholar
4. C. S. Fraser, Digital camera self-calibration, ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 52 (4) (1997) 149–159. Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. C. S. Fraser, Network design considerations for non-topographic photogrammetry, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 50 (8) (1984) 1115–1126. Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. C. S. Fraser, Network design, Close Range Photogrammetry and Mach. Vis. (1996) 256–281. Google Scholar
7. J. Y. Gong and S. P. Ji, From photogrammetry to computer vision, Geomat. Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 42 (11) (2017) 1518–1522. Google Scholar
8. C. Haig, C. Heipke and M. Wiggenhagen, Lens inclination due to instable fixings detected and verified with VDI/VDE 2634 Part 1, Int. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 2006, 6.Part 5. Google Scholar
9. H. Hastedt, T. Luhmann and W. Tecklenburg, Image-variant interior orientation and sensor modelling of high quality digital cameras, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Inf. Sci. 34 (5) (2002) 27–32. Google Scholar
10. G. P. Huang, Theorys, Methods and Applications of Digital Close Range Industrial Photogrammetry (Science Press, Beijing, China, 2016), pp. 32–36. Google Scholar
11. S. O. Mason, Conceptual model of the convergent multistation network configuration task, Photogramm. Record 15 (86) (1995) 277–299. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. F. Menna and S. Troisi, Photogrammetric 3D modelling of a boat’s hull, Proc. Optical 3D Measurement Techniques Conf., 2007, Zurich, pp. 347–354. Google Scholar
13. F. Remondino and C. Fraser, Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf. Sci. 36 (5) (2006) 266–272. Google Scholar
14. D. H. Rieke-Zapp, W. Tecklenburg, J. Peipe, H. Hastedt and T. Luhmann, Performance evaluation of several high-quality digital cameras, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Inf. Sci. 37 (Part B5) (2008) 7–12. Google Scholar
15. L. F. Sui, L. J. Song and H. Z. Cai, Errors Theory and Foundation of Surveying Adjustment (Surveying and Mapping Press, Beijing, China, 2010), pp. 1–40. Google Scholar
16. V. Tuominen and I. Niini, Verification of the accuracy of a real-time optical 3D-measuring system on production line, Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf. Sci. 37 (2008) 13–19. Google Scholar
17. VDI/VDE 2634 Part 1, Optical 3D measuring systems — Imaging systems with point-by-point probing 2002-05, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, http://www.vdi.de. Last accessed 21 April 2010. Google Scholar
18. A. Walford, One part in 300,000. Precision and Accuracy Discussion. Report, Eos Systems Inc. (2006). Google Scholar
19. Y. Wang, G. J. Zhang and J. L. Wang, A calibration method based on coplanar reference object for multi stereo vision sensors, J. Optoelectron. Laser 19 (6) (2008) 754–757. Google Scholar
20. Y. X. Yang, Some notes on uncertainty, uncertainty measure and accuracy in satellite navigation, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 41 (5) (2012) 646–650. Google Scholar
21. Z. X. Zhang, Digital photogrammetry and computer vision, Geo. Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 29 (12) (2004) 1035–1039. Google Scholar