Case StudiesNo Access

CREATING INDEPENDENT ADVOCATES FOR ENTREPRENEURS WITHIN GOVERNMENT: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE SMALL BUSINESS COMMISSIONER MODEL

MICHAEL T. SCHAPER

Murdoch University Business School, South Street, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495808000132Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

This paper provides a critical overview of a recent attempt to create an independent statutory "voice" for small enterprises within the formal government bureaucracy in one Australian jurisdiction. It discusses the creation and eighteen months of activity of the Small Business Commissioner of the Australian Capital Territory.

In 2003 the ACT government foreshadowed that, as part of its strategy to create the most small-business-friendly location in Australia, it would establish a Small Business Commissioner as a statutory appointment. The Legislative Assembly passed the Small Business Commissioner Act in 2004 and activity began in March 2005.

The key activities of the Commissioner have been to examine small business complaints about ACT government agencies; to promote the use of mediation and/or other alternative dispute resolution tools for the settlement of disputes between small enterprises and other businesses; to provide independent advice to the Territory government about laws, regulations and policies that may affect small firms; to oversee the introduction of small business service charters within government agencies; and to establish a more "business friendly" service culture within ACT government agencies.

On one hand, it is clear that a Commissioner role has a potentially significant strategic importance for small and medium-sized enterprises, principally through the provision of independent commentary, pushing for red tape and regulatory reduction, and by providing mediation services and investigative functions. However, there are also some current problems with the role. These include potential overlap with other regulatory and investigative bodies; lack of formal compulsive powers; its dependence on political support for its effectiveness; insufficient resources; and the nature of the relationship it has with other government entities.

Keywords:

References

ACT Government , The Economic White Paper For the Australian Capital Territory ( ACT Government , Canberra , 2003 ) . Google Scholar
ACT Small Business Commissioner , Business Names Registration in Australia: Time For Reform? ( Office of the ACT Small Business Commissioner , Canberra , 2006 ) . Google Scholar
ACT Small Business Commissioner , Annual Report of the Small Business Commissioner 2004-5 ( Legislative Assembly of the Australian Capital Territory , Canberra , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
ACT Small Business Commissioner , Future Mediation Services For ACT Small Businesses: A Consultation Paper ( Office of the ACT Small Business Commissioner , Canberra , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
ACT Small Business Commissioner , Implementing Small Business Service Charters within The ACT Public Service ( Office of the ACT Small Business Commissioner , Canberra , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics , Characteristics of Small Business, Australia 2004 ( Australian Bureau of Statistics , Canberra , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2003). The SME Envoy: An Active Interface Between the Commission And the SME Community Brussels: Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2003) 60 . Google Scholar
Small Business Commissioner Act 2004. [Australian Capital Territory] No. 70 of 2004 . Google Scholar
Small Business Commissioner Act 2003. [Victoria] No. 6 of 2003 . Google Scholar
US Small Business Administration , Securing Rights and Benefits for Small Business: 2004 National Ombudsman Report to Congress ( US Small Business Administration , Washington , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
Victorian Small Business Commissioner , Victorian Small Business Commissioner Annual Report 2004-05 ( Office of the Victorian Small Business Commissioner , Melbourne , 2005 ) . Google Scholar