Open Access

Recent Advances in Acoustic Boundary Element Methods

Chair of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines, Department of Engineering Physics and Computation, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching, Germany

E-mail Address: simone.preuss@tum.de

Search for more papers by this author

Caglar Gurbuz

Search for more papers by this author

Christopher Jelich

Search for more papers by this author

Suhaib Koji Baydoun

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Steffen Marburg

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S2591728522400023Cited by:23 (Source: Crossref)

This article is part of the issue:

Special Issue on the Occasion of the 30th Anniversary of the Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics
Edited by Michael D. Collins, Steffen Marburg and Andrew N. Norris

Abstract

The modern scope of boundary element methods (BEM) for acoustics is reviewed in this paper. Over the last decades the BEM has gained popularity despite suffering from shortcomings, such as fictitious eigenfrequencies and poor scalability due to its dense and frequency-dependent coefficient matrices. Recent research activities have been focused on alleviating these drawbacks to enhance BEM usability across industry and academia. This paper reviews what is commonly known as direct BEM for linear time-harmonic acoustics. After introducing the boundary integral formulation of the Helmholtz equation for interior and exterior acoustic problems, recommendations are given regarding the boundary meshing and treatment of the non-uniqueness problem. It is shown how frequency sweeps and modal analyses can be carried out with BEM. Further extensions for efficient modeling of large-scale problems, including fast BEM and solutions methods, are surveyed. Additionally, this review paper discusses new application areas for modern BEM, such as viscothermal wave propagation, surface contribution analyses, and simulation of periodically arranged structures as found in acoustic metamaterials.

Keywords:

References

1. A. D. Pierce, Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), 3rd edition. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. C. A. Brebbia, J. C. F. Telles and L. C. Wrobel, Boundary Element Techniques (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1984). Crossref, Google Scholar
3. S. Marburg and B. Nolte, eds., Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008). Crossref, Google Scholar
4. M. Kaltenbacher, ed., Computational Acoustics (Springer, Wien, 2018), 1st edition. Crossref, Google Scholar
5. S. Kirkup, The boundary element method in acoustics: A survey, Applied Sciences 9 (2019) 1642. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. K. U. I. Philip, M. Morse, Theoretical Acoustics (Princeton University Press, 1987). Google Scholar
7. S. Marburg, Boundary element method for time–harmonic acoustic problems, in Computational Acoustics, ed. M. Kaltenbacher (Springer, Wien, 2018), CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, ch. 3, pp. 69–159. Crossref, Google Scholar
8. F. Ihlenburg, Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering, volume 132 of Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1998). Crossref, Google Scholar
9. S. Marburg and R. Anderssohn, Fluid structure interaction and admittance boundary conditions: Setup of an analytical example, Journal of Computational Acoustics 19 (2011) 63–74. Link, Google Scholar
10. T. W. Wu, ed., Boundary Element Acoustics: Fundamentals and Computer Codes (WIT Press, Southampton, 2000). Google Scholar
11. A. Bermúdez, L. Hervella-Nieto, A. Prieto and R. Rodríguez, An optimal perfectly matched layer with unbounded absorbing function for time-harmonic acoustic scattering problems, Journal of Computational Physics 223 (2007) 469–488. Crossref, Google Scholar
12. H. Bériot and A. Modave, An automatic perfectly matched layer for acoustic finite element simulations in convex domains of general shape, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 122 (2021) 1239–1261. Google Scholar
13. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden, Acoustics Module User’s Guide, COMSOL Multiphysics v. 6.0, 2021. Google Scholar
14. Y. Liu, On the BEM for acoustic wave problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 107 (2019) 53–62. Crossref, Google Scholar
15. R. D. Ciskowski and C. A. Brebbia, eds., Boundary Elements in Acoustics (Computational Mechanics Publications and Elsevier Applied Science, Southampton Boston, 1991). Google Scholar
16. S. Marburg, Conventional boundary element techniques: Recent developments and opportunities, in Proceedings of the 46th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), eds. S. K. Tang, L. Cheng and C. W. Law (Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, 2017), pp. 2673–2688. Google Scholar
17. K. E. Atkinson, The Numerical Solution of Integral Equations of the Second Kind (Cambridge University Press, 1997), 1st edition. Crossref, Google Scholar
18. S. Marburg, Six boundary elements per wavelength. Is that enough?, Journal of Computational Acoustics 10 (2002) 25–51. Link, Google Scholar
19. S. Marburg and S. Schneider, Influence of element types on numeric error for acoustic boundary elements, Journal of Computational Acoustics 11 (2003) 363–386. Link, Google Scholar
20. S. Marburg, Numerical damping in the acoustic boundary element method, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 102 (2016) 415–418. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. S. Marburg, A pollution effect in the boundary element method for acoustic problems, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 26 (2018) 1850018. Link, Google Scholar
22. S. Marburg, Discretization requirements: How many elements per wavelength are necessary?, in Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, eds. S. Marburg and B. Nolte (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008), ch. 11, pp. 309–332. Crossref, Google Scholar
23. I. Harari, Dispersion, pollution, and resolution, in Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, eds. S. Marburg and B. Nolte (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008), ch. 1, pp. 37–56. Crossref, Google Scholar
24. J. J. d. Rego Silva, Acoustic and Elastic Wave Scattering Using Boundary Elements, volume 18 of Topics in Engineering (Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton Boston, 1993). Google Scholar
25. J. J. d. Rego Silva, L. C. Wrobel and J. C. F. Telles, A new family of continuous/discontinuous three–dimensional boundary elements with application to acoustic wave propagation, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 36 (1993) 1661–1679. Crossref, Google Scholar
26. A. Tadeu and J. Antonio, Use of constant, linear and quadratic boundary elements in 3D wave diffraction analysis, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 24 (2000) 131–144. Crossref, Google Scholar
27. G. Chandler, Superconvergence of numerical solutions to second kind integral equations, Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, 1979. Google Scholar
28. F. Chatelin and R. Lebbar, The iterated projection solution for the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Series B 22 (1981) 439–451. Crossref, Google Scholar
29. S. Ramesh, K.-M. Lim and B. Khoo, Comparison of constant and discontinuous quadratic boundary elements for exterior axisymmetric acoustic-wave propagation problems, Journal of Computational Acoustics 23 (2015) 1540003. Link, Google Scholar
30. S. Marburg and S. Amini, Cat’s eye radiation with boundary elements: Comparative study on treatment of irregular frequencies, Journal of Computational Acoustics 13 (2005) 21–45. Link, Google Scholar
31. M. Peake, J. Trevelyan and G. Coates, Extended isogeometric boundary element method (XIBEM) for two-dimensional Helmholtz problems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 259 (2013) 93–102. Crossref, Google Scholar
32. M. Peake, J. Trevelyan and G. Coates, Extended isogeometric boundary element method (XIBEM) for three-dimensional medium-wave acoustic scattering problems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 284 (2015) 762–780. Crossref, Google Scholar
33. M. Peake, J. Trevelyan and G. Coates, Novel basis functions for the partition of unity boundary element method for Helmholtz problems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 93 (2013) 905–918. Crossref, Google Scholar
34. R. Simpson, M. Scott, M. Taus, D. Thomas and H. Lian, Acoustic isogeometric boundary element analysis, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 269 (2014) 265–290. Crossref, Google Scholar
35. S. Keuchel, N. Hagelstein, O. Zaleski and O. von Estorff, Evaluation of hypersingular and nearly singular integrals in the isogeometric boundary element method for acoustics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 325 (2017) 488–504. Crossref, Google Scholar
36. Y. Sun, J. Trevelyan, G. Hattori and C. Lu, Discontinuous isogeometric boundary element (IGABEM) formulations in 3D automotive acoustics, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 105 (2019) 303–311. Crossref, Google Scholar
37. L. Chen, W. Zhao, C. Liu, H. Chen and S. Marburg, Isogeometric fast multipole boundary element method based on Burton-Miller formulation for 3D acoustic problems, Archives of Acoustics 44 (2019) 475–492. Google Scholar
38. L. Chen, S. Marburg, W. Zhao, C. Liu and H. Chen, Implementation of isogeometric fast multipole boundary element methods for 2D half-space acoustic scattering problems with absorbing boundary condition, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 27 (2019) 1850050. Link, Google Scholar
39. L. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Lian, E. Atroshchenko, C. Ding and S. Bordas, Seamless integration of computer-aided geometric modeling and acoustic simulation: Isogeometric boundary element methods based on catmull-clark subdivision surfaces, Advances in Engineering Software 149 (2020) 102888. Crossref, Google Scholar
40. L. Chen, C. Lu, W. Zhao, H. Chen and C. Zheng, Subdivision surfaces — Boundary element accelerated by fast multipole for the structural acoustic problem, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 28 (2020) 2050011. Link, Google Scholar
41. E. Inci, L. Coox, O. Atak, E. Deckers and W. Desmet, Applications of an isogeometric indirect boundary element method and the importance of accurate geometrical representation in acoustic problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 110 (2020) 124–136. Crossref, Google Scholar
42. Z. Liu, M. Majeed, F. Cirak and R. N. Simpson, Isogeometric FEM-BEM coupled structural-acoustic analysis of shells using subdivision surfaces, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 113 (2018) 1507–1530. Crossref, Google Scholar
43. Y. Wu, C. Dong, H. Yang and F. Sun, Isogeometric symmetric FE-BE coupling method for acoustic-structural interaction, Applied Mathematics and Computation 393 (2021) 125758. Crossref, Google Scholar
44. J. Wang, C. Zheng, L. Chen and H. Chen, Acoustic shape optimization based on isogeometric wideband fast multipole boundary element method with adjoint variable method, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 28 (2020) 2050015. Link, Google Scholar
45. A. Shaaban, C. Anitescu, E. Atroshchenko and T. Rabczuk, An isogeometric Burton-Miller method for the transmission loss optimization with application to mufflers with internal extended tubes, Applied Acoustics 185 (2022) 108410. Crossref, Google Scholar
46. L. Chen, H. Lian, S. Natarajan, W. Zhao, X. Chen and S. Bordas, Multi-frequency acoustic topology optimization of sound-absorption materials with isogeometric boundary element methods accelerated by frequency-decoupling and model order reduction techniques, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 395 (2022) 114997. Crossref, Google Scholar
47. L. L. Thompson and P. M. Pinsky, Complex wavenumber Fourier analysis of the p–version finite element method, Computational Mechanics 13 (1994) 255–275. Crossref, Google Scholar
48. S. Keuchel, K. Vater and O. Estorff, hp Fast multipole boundary element method for 3D acoustics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 110 (2017) 842–861. Crossref, Google Scholar
49. B. Gilvey and J. Trevelyan, A comparison of high-order and plane wave enriched boundary element basis functions for Helmholtz problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 122 (2021) 190–201. Crossref, Google Scholar
50. S. Marburg, Explicit frequency dependent matrices in the BE formulation, in Proceedings of the 27th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), eds, V. C. Goodwin and D. C. Stevenson (New Zealand Acoustical Society Inc., Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998), pp. 1533–1536. Google Scholar
51. J. Fahnline, Numerical difficulties with boundary element solutions of interior acoustic problems, Journal of Sound and Vibration 319 (2009) 1083–1096. Crossref, Google Scholar
52. D. Nardini and C. A. Brebbia, Boundary integral formulation of mass matrix for dynamic analysis, in Time–Dependent and Vibration Problems, ed. C. A. Brebbia (Springer, 1985), volume 2 of Topics in Boundary Element Research, ch. 7. Google Scholar
53. P. K. Banerjee, S. Ahmad and H. C. Wang, A new BEM formulation for the acoustic eigenfrequency analysis, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 26 (1988) 1299–1309. Crossref, Google Scholar
54. Z. S. Chen, G. Hofstetter and H. A. Mang, A 3D boundary element method for determination of acoustic eigenfrequencies considering admittance boundary conditions, Journal of Computational Acoustics 1 (1993) 455–468. Link, Google Scholar
55. F. Mattioli, Numerical instabilities of the integral approach to the interior boundary–value problem for the two–dimensional Helmholtz equation, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 15 (1980) 1303–1313. Crossref, Google Scholar
56. S. Kuo, J. Chen and C. Huang, Analytical study and numerical experiments for true and spurious eigensolutions of a circular cavity using the real-part dual BEM, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 48 (2000) 1401–1422. Crossref, Google Scholar
57. C.-J. Zheng, H.-B. Chen, H.-F. Gao and L. Du, Is the Burton-Miller formulation really free of fictitious eigenfrequencies?, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 59 (2015) 43–51. Crossref, Google Scholar
58. J. Galkowski and E. A. Spence, Does the Helmholtz boundary element method suffer from the pollution effect? (2022), arXiv:2201.09721 Preprint. Google Scholar
59. J. Galkowski, E. Müller and E. Spence, Wavenumber-explicit analysis for the Helmholtz h-BEM: Error estimates and iteration counts for the Dirichlet problem, Numerische Mathematik 142 (2019) 329–357. Crossref, Google Scholar
60. S. K. Baydoun and S. Marburg, Quantification of numerical damping in the acoustic boundary element method for two-dimensional duct problems, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 26 (2018) 1850022. Link, Google Scholar
61. J. Chen, S. Lin and J. Tsai, Fictitious frequency revisited, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 33 (2009) 1289–1301. Crossref, Google Scholar
62. S. Marburg and T. W. Wu, Treating the phenomenon of irregular frequencies, in Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, eds. S. Marburg and B. Nolte (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008), ch. 15, pp. 411–434. Crossref, Google Scholar
63. S. Marburg, The Burton and Miller method: Unlocking another mystery of its coupling parameter, Journal of Computational Acoustics 24 (2016) 1550016. Link, Google Scholar
64. H. A. Schenck, Improved integral formulation for acoustic radiation problems, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44 (1968) 41–58. Crossref, Google Scholar
65. A. J. Burton and G. F. Miller, The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary–value problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 323 (1971) 201–220. Google Scholar
66. H. Brakhage and P. Werner, Über das Dirichlet’sche Außenraumproblem für die Helmholtz’sche Schwingungsgleichung, Archiv der Mathematik 16 (1965) 325–329. Crossref, Google Scholar
67. O. I. Panič, K voprosu o razrešimosti vnešnich kraevich zadač dlja volnovogo uravnenija i dlja sistemi uravnenij MAXWELL a, Uspechi Mathematiceskich Nauk 20 (1965) 221–226. Google Scholar
68. G. Diwan, J. Trevelyan and G. Coates, A comparison of techniques for overcoming non-uniqueness of boundary integral equations for the collocation partition of unity method in two-dimensional acoustic scattering, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 96 (2013) 645–664. Crossref, Google Scholar
69. J. Chen, I. Chen and K. Chen, Treatment of rank deficiency in acoustics using SVD, Journal of Computational Acoustics 14 (2006) 157–183. Link, Google Scholar
70. F. Hu, M. Pizzo and D. Nark, On a time domain boundary integral equation formulation for acoustic scattering by rigid bodies in uniform mean flow, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (2017) 3624–3636. Crossref, Google Scholar
71. K. Matsushima, H. Isakari, T. Takahashi and T. Matsumoto, An investigation of eigenfrequencies of boundary integral equations and the Burton-Miller formulation in two-dimensional elastodynamics, International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 6 (2018) 1127–1137. Crossref, Google Scholar
72. M. Guiggiani, G. Krishnasamy, T. J. Rudolphi and F. J. Rizzo, A general algorithm for the numerical solution of hypersingular boundary integral equations, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 59 (1992) 604–614. Crossref, Google Scholar
73. M. Guiggiani, Formulation and numerical treatment of boundary integral equations with hypersingular kernels, in Singular Integrals in Boundary Element Methods, eds. V. Sladek and J. Sladek (Computational Mechanics Publications, 1998), ch. 3, pp. 85–124. Google Scholar
74. P. Marchand, J. Galkowski, E. A. Spence and A. Spence, Applying GMRES to the Helmholtz equation with strong trapping: how does the number of iterations depend on the frequency?, Advances in Computational Mathematics 48 (2022) 37. Crossref, Google Scholar
75. S. Chandler-Wilde and E. Spence, Coercivity, essential norms, and the Galerkin method for second-kind integral equations on polyhedral and Lipschitz domains, Numerische Mathematik 150 (2022) 299–371. Crossref, Google Scholar
76. J. Galkowski, P. Marchand and E. Spence, Eigenvalues of the truncated Helmholtz solution operator under strong trapping, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 53 (2021) 6724–6770. Crossref, Google Scholar
77. D. Lafontaine, E. Spence and J. Wunsch, For most frequencies, strong trapping has a weak effect in frequency-domain scattering, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 74 (2021) 2025–2063. Crossref, Google Scholar
78. X. Chen, Q. He, C.-J. Zheng, C. Wan, C.-X. Bi and B. Wang, A parameter study of the Burton-Miller formulation in the BEM analysis of acoustic resonances in exterior configurations, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 29 (2021) 2050023. Link, Google Scholar
79. C.-J. Zheng, C.-X. Bi, C. Zhang, Y.-B. Zhang and H.-B. Chen, Fictitious eigenfrequencies in the BEM for interior acoustic problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 104 (2019) 170–182. Crossref, Google Scholar
80. I. Harari and T. J. R. Hughes, A cost comparison of boundary element and finite element methods for problems of time-harmonic acoustics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 97 (1992) 77–102. Crossref, Google Scholar
81. J.-P. Coyette, C. Lecomte, J.-L. Migeot, J. Blanche, M. Rochette and G. Mirkovic, Calculation of vibro-acoustic frequency response functions using a single frequency boundary element solution and a Padé expansion, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 85 (1999) 371–377. Google Scholar
82. H. Jiang, S. Zhong, X. Zhang and X. Huang, Efficient storage and interpolation of acoustic transfer functions, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 124 (2021) 259–265. Crossref, Google Scholar
83. S. M. Kirkup and D. J. Henwood, Methods for speeding up the boundary element solutions of acoustic radiation problems, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 144 (1992) 347–380. Google Scholar
84. C. Effenberger and D. Kressner, Chebyshev interpolation for nonlinear eigenvalue problems, BIT Numerical Mathematics 52 (2012) 933–951. Crossref, Google Scholar
85. J. Xiao, J. Wang, T. Liang and L. Wen, The RSRR method for solving large-scale nonlinear eigenvalue problems in boundary element method, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 93 (2018) 150–160. Crossref, Google Scholar
86. D. Panagiotopoulos, E. Deckers and W. Desmet, Krylov subspaces recycling based model order reduction for acoustic BEM systems and an error estimator, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 359 (2020) 112755. Crossref, Google Scholar
87. X. Xie and Y. Liu, An adaptive model order reduction method for boundary element-based multi-frequency acoustic wave problems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 373 (2021) 113532. Crossref, Google Scholar
88. H. Peters, N. Kessissoglou and S. Marburg, Modal decomposition of exterior acoustic-structure interaction, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (2013) 2668–2677. Crossref, Google Scholar
89. M. El-Guide, A. Miȩdlar and Y. Saad, A rational approximation method for solving acoustic nonlinear eigenvalue problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 111 (2020) 44–54. Crossref, Google Scholar
90. S. K. Baydoun, M. Voigt and S. Marburg, Low-rank iteration schemes for the multi-frequency solution of acoustic boundary element equations, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 29 (2021) 2150004. Link, Google Scholar
91. S. Dirckx, D. Huybrechs and K. Meerbergen, Frequency extraction for BEM-matrices arising from the 3D scalar Helmholtz equation (2022), arXiv:2012.14287, Preprint. Google Scholar
92. S. Lefteriu, M. Souza Lenzi, H. Bériot, M. Tournour and W. Desmet, Fast frequency sweep method for indirect boundary element models arising in acoustics, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 69 (2016) 32–45. Crossref, Google Scholar
93. S. K. Baydoun, M. Voigt, C. Jelich and S. Marburg, A greedy reduced basis scheme for multifrequency solution of structural acoustic systems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 121 (2020) 187–200. Crossref, Google Scholar
94. C. Jelich, S. K. Baydoun, M. Voigt and S. Marburg, A greedy reduced basis algorithm for structural acoustic systems with parameter and implicit frequency dependence, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 122 (2021) 7409–7430. Crossref, Google Scholar
95. D. Panagiotopoulos, W. Desmet and E. Deckers, An automatic Krylov subspaces recycling technique for the construction of a global solution basis of non-affine parametric linear systems, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 373 (2021) 113510. Crossref, Google Scholar
96. S. M. Kirkup and S. Amini, Solution of the Helmholtz eigenvalue problem via the boundary element method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 36 (1993) 321–330. Crossref, Google Scholar
97. H. Peters, N. Kessissoglou and S. Marburg, Modal decomposition of exterior acoustic-structure interaction problems with model order reduction, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (2014) 2706–2717. Crossref, Google Scholar
98. S. K. Baydoun, M. Voigt, B. Goderbauer, C. Jelich and S. Marburg, A subspace iteration eigensolver based on Cauchy integrals for vibroacoustic problems in unbounded domains, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 122 (2021) 4250–4269. Crossref, Google Scholar
99. C.-J. Zheng, H.-F. Gao, L. Du, H.-B. Chen and C. Zhang, An accurate and efficient acoustic eigensolver based on a fast multipole BEM and a contour integral method, Journal of Computational Physics 305 (2016) 677–699. Crossref, Google Scholar
100. F. Kronowetter, S. K. Baydoun, M. Eser, L. Moheit and S. Marburg, A benchmark study on eigenfrequencies of fluid-loaded structures, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 28 (2020) 2050013. Link, Google Scholar
101. T. Liang, J. Wang, J. Xiao and L. Wen, Coupled BE-FE based vibroacoustic modal analysis and frequency sweep using a generalized resolvent sampling method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 345 (2019) 518–538. Crossref, Google Scholar
102. T. Sakuma, S. Schneider and Y. Yasuda, Fast solution methods, in Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, eds. S. Marburg and B. Nolte (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 333–366. Crossref, Google Scholar
103. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, A fast algorithm for particle simulations, Journal of Computational Physics 73 (1987) 325–348. Crossref, Google Scholar
104. V. Rokhlin, Rapid solution of integral equations of scattering theory in two dimensions, Journal of Computational Physics 86 (1990) 414–439. Crossref, Google Scholar
105. V. Rokhlin, Diagonal forms of translation operators for the Helmholtz equation in three dimensions, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 1 (1993) 82–93. Crossref, Google Scholar
106. E. Darve, The fast multipole method I: Error analysis and asymptotic complexity, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 38 (2000) 98–128. Crossref, Google Scholar
107. E. Darve, The fast multipole method: Numerical implementation, Journal of Computational Physics 160 (2000) 195–240. Crossref, Google Scholar
108. R. Coifman, V. Rokhlin and S. Wandzura, The fast multipole method for the wave equation: A pedestrian prescription, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 35 (1993) 7–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
109. N. A. Gumerov and R. Duraiswami, Fast Multipole Methods for the Helmholtz Equation in Three Dimensions, Elsevier Series in Electromagnetism (Elsevier, 2004). Google Scholar
110. Y. Liu, Fast Multipole Boundary Element Method: Theory and Applications in Engineering (Cambridge University Press, 2009). Crossref, Google Scholar
111. H. Harbrecht and M. Peters, Comparison of fast boundary element methods on parametric surfaces, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 261-262 (2013) 39–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
112. M. Bebendorf, Approximation of boundary element matrices, Numerische Mathematik 86 (2000) 565–589. Crossref, Google Scholar
113. M. Bebendorf and S. Rjasanow, Adaptive low-rank approximation of collocation matrices, Computing 70 (2003) 1–24. Crossref, Google Scholar
114. S. Kurz, O. Rain and S. Rjasanow, The adaptive cross-approximation technique for the 3D boundary-element method, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 38 (2002) 421–424. Crossref, Google Scholar
115. D. Brunner, M. Junge, P. Rapp, M. Bebendorf and L. Gaul, Comparison of the fast multipole method with hierarchical matrices for the Helmholtz-BEM, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 58 (2010) 131–160. Google Scholar
116. J. R. Phillips and J. K. White, A precorrected-FFT method for electrostatic analysis of complicated 3-D structures, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 16 (1997) 1059–1072. Crossref, Google Scholar
117. J. Tausch, Sparse BEM for potential theory and Stokes flow using variable order wavelets, Computational Mechanics 32 (2003) 312–318. Crossref, Google Scholar
118. G. Beylkin, R. Coifman and V. Rokhlin, Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms, in Fundamental Papers in Wavelet Theory (Princeton University Press, 2009), pp. 741–783. Google Scholar
119. C. Bauinger and O. P. Bruno, “Interpolated factored green function” method for accelerated solution of scattering problems, Journal of Computational Physics 430 (2021) 110095. Crossref, Google Scholar
120. E. Jimenez, C. Bauinger and O. P. Bruno, IFGF-accelerated integral equation solvers for acoustic scattering (2021), arXiv:2112.06316, Preprint. Google Scholar
121. L. Greengard, J. Huang, V. Rokhlin and S. Wandzura, Accelerating fast multipole methods for the Helmholtz equation at low frequencies, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering 5 (1998) 32–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
122. B. Engquist and L. Ying, Fast directional algorithms for the Helmholtz kernel, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 234 (2010) 1851–1859. Crossref, Google Scholar
123. M. Messner, M. Schanz and E. Darve, Fast directional multilevel summation for oscillatory kernels based on Chebyshev interpolation, Journal of Computational Physics 231 (2012) 1175–1196. Crossref, Google Scholar
124. L. Banjai and W. Hackbusch, Hierarchical matrix techniques for low- and high-frequency Helmholtz problems, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 28 (2007) 46–79. Crossref, Google Scholar
125. N. A. Gumerov and R. Duraiswami, A broadband fast multipole accelerated boundary element method for the three dimensional Helmholtz equation, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (2009) 191–205. Crossref, Google Scholar
126. D. R. Wilkes, A. J. Duncan and S. Marburg, A parallel and broadband Helmholtz FMBEM model for large-scale target strength modeling, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 28 (2020) 2050001. Link, Google Scholar
127. M. S. Bapat, L. Shen and Y. J. Liu, Adaptive fast multipole boundary element method for three-dimensional half-space acoustic wave problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 33 (2009) 1113–1123. Crossref, Google Scholar
128. Y. Yasuda, K. Higuchi, T. Oshima and T. Sakuma, Efficient technique in low-frequency fast multipole boundary element method for plane-symmetric acoustic problems, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 36 (2012) 1493–1501. Crossref, Google Scholar
129. C.-J. Zheng, W.-Y. Liu, Y.-B. Zhang, C.-X. Bi, H.-F. Gao and H.-B. Chen, Simulation of sound propagation over an infinite impedance plane by using a fast multipole BEM, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 28 (2020) 2050020. Link, Google Scholar
130. M. H. Cho and A. H. Barnett, Robust fast direct integral equation solver for quasi-periodic scattering problems with a large number of layers, Optics Express 23 (2015) 1775. Crossref, Google Scholar
131. B. Wang, D. Chen, B. Zhang, W. Zhang, M. H. Cho and W. Cai, Taylor expansion based fast multipole method for 3-D Helmholtz equations in layered media, Journal of Computational Physics 401 (2020) 109008. Crossref, Google Scholar
132. T. Takahashi and T. Hamada, GPU-accelerated boundary element method for Helmholtz equation in three dimensions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 80 (2009) 1295–1321. Crossref, Google Scholar
133. T. Wang, R. Yokota and L. Barba, ExaFMM: A high-performance fast multipole method library with C++ and Python interfaces, Journal of Open Source Software 6 (2021) 3145. Crossref, Google Scholar
134. P. Amado-Mendes, L. Godinho, J. Carbajo and J. Ramis-Soriano, Numerical modelling of finite periodic arrays of acoustic resonators using an efficient 3D BEM model, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 102 (2019) 73–86. Crossref, Google Scholar
135. N. Yoshii, Y. Andoh and S. Okazaki, Fast multipole method for three-dimensional systems with periodic boundary condition in two directions, Journal of Computational Chemistry 41 (2020) 940–948. Crossref, Google Scholar
136. P. G. Martinsson and V. Rokhlin, A fast direct solver for boundary integral equations in two dimensions, Journal of Computational Physics 205 (2005) 1–23. Crossref, Google Scholar
137. T. Takahashi, P. Coulier and E. Darve, Application of the inverse fast multipole method as a preconditioner in a 3D Helmholtz boundary element method, Journal of Computational Physics 341 (2017) 406–428. Crossref, Google Scholar
138. M. Shen and W. Cao, Acoustic bandgap formation in a periodic structure with multilayer unit cells, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 33 (2000) 1150–1154. Crossref, Google Scholar
139. C. Gurbuz, F. Kronowetter, C. Dietz, M. Eser, J. Schmid and S. Marburg, Generative adversarial networks for the design of acoustic metamaterials, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149 (2021) 1162–1174. Crossref, Google Scholar
140. N. Jiménez, O. Umnova and J.-P. Groby, eds., Acoustic Waves in Periodic Structures, Metamaterials, and Porous Media (Springer International Publishing, 2021). Crossref, Google Scholar
141. M. I. Hussein, M. J. Leamy and M. Ruzzene, Dynamics of phononic materials and structures: Historical origins, recent progress, and future outlook, Applied Mechanics Review 66 (2014) 040802. Crossref, Google Scholar
142. H. Isakari, T. Takahashi and T. Matsumoto, Periodic band structure calculation by the Sakurai-Sugiura method with a fast direct solver for the boundary element method with the fast multipole representation, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 68 (2016) 42–53. Crossref, Google Scholar
143. H. Gao, L. Chen, H. Lian, C. Zheng, H. Xu and T. Matsumoto, Band structure analysis for 2D acoustic phononic structure using isogeometric boundary element method, Advances in Engineering Software 149 (2020) 102888. Crossref, Google Scholar
144. Y. W. Lam, A boundary integral formulation for the prediction of acoustic scattering from periodic structures, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 762–769. Crossref, Google Scholar
145. S. M. B. Fard, H. Peters, N. Kessissoglou and S. Marburg, Three-dimensional analysis of a noise barrier using a quasi-periodic boundary element method, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (2015) 3107–3114. Crossref, Google Scholar
146. S. B. Fard, H. Peters, S. Marburg and N. Kessissoglou, Acoustic performance of a barrier embedded with Helmholtz resonators using a quasi-periodic boundary element technique, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 103 (2017) 444–450. Crossref, Google Scholar
147. P. Jean and J. Defrance, Sound propagation in rows of cylinders of infinite extent: Application to sonic crystals and thickets along roads, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 101 (2015) 474–483. Crossref, Google Scholar
148. V. Rokhlin and S. Wandzura, The fast multipole method for periodic structures, in Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium and URSI National Radio Science Meeting (IEEE, Seattle, USA, 1994), pp. 424–426. Crossref, Google Scholar
149. M. Challacombe, C. White and M. Head-Gordon, Periodic boundary conditions and the fast multipole method, The Journal of Chemical Physics 107 (1997) 10131–10140. Crossref, Google Scholar
150. N. A. Gumerov and R. Duraiswami, A method to compute periodic sums, Journal of Computational Physics 272 (2014) 307–326. Crossref, Google Scholar
151. Y. Otani and N. Nishimura, An FMM for periodic boundary value problems for cracks for Helmholtz equation in 2D, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 73 (2007) 381–406. Crossref, Google Scholar
152. K. Niino and N. Nishimura, Preconditioning based on Calderon’s formulae for periodic fast multipole methods for Helmholtz’ equation, Journal of Computational Physics 231 (2012) 66–81. Crossref, Google Scholar
153. H. Ziegelwanger, P. Reiter and M. Conter, The three-dimensional quasi-periodic boundary element method: Implementation, evaluation, and use cases, International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 5 (2017) 404–414. Crossref, Google Scholar
154. D. Duhamel, Efficient calculation of the three-dimensional sound pressure field around a noise barrier, Journal of Sound and Vibration 197 (1996) 547–571. Crossref, Google Scholar
155. X. D. Song, Q. Li and D. J. Wu, Investigation of rail noise and bridge noise using a combined 3D dynamic model and 2.5D acoustic model, Applied Acoustics 109 (2016) 5–17. Crossref, Google Scholar
156. Q. Li, D. Duhamel, Y. Luo and H. Yin, Analysing the acoustic performance of a nearly-enclosed noise barrier using scale model experiments and a 2.5-D BEM approach, Applied Acoustics 158 (2020) 107079. Crossref, Google Scholar
157. L. Moheit, S. Anthis, J. Heinz, F. Kronowetter and S. Marburg, Analysis of scattering by finite sonic crystals in free field with infinite elements and normal modes, Journal of Sound and Vibration 476 (2020) 115291. Crossref, Google Scholar
158. M. Karimi, P. Croaker and N. Kessissoglou, Boundary element solution for periodic acoustic problems, Journal of Sound and Vibration 360 (2016) 129–139. Crossref, Google Scholar
159. M. Karimi, P. Croaker, N. Peake and N. Kessissoglou, Acoustic scattering for rotational and translational symmetric structures in nonuniform potential flow, AIAA Journal 55 (2017) 3318–3327. Crossref, Google Scholar
160. M. Karimi, P. Croaker and N. Kessissoglou, Acoustic scattering for 3D multi-directional periodic structures using the boundary element method, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (2017) 313–323. Crossref, Google Scholar
161. C. Jelich, W. Zhao, H. Chen and S. Marburg, Fast multipole boundary element method for the acoustic analysis of finite periodic structures, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 391 (2022) 114528. Crossref, Google Scholar
162. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989). Google Scholar
163. Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
164. M. H. Gutknecht, Block Krylov space methods for linear systems with multiple right-hand sides: An introduction, in Modern Mathematical Models, Methods and Algorithms for Real World Systems, eds. A. H. Siddiqi, I. Duff and O. Christensen (Anamaya Publishers, 2007), pp. 1–22. Google Scholar
165. C. Jelich, M. Karimi, N. Kessissoglou and S. Marburg, Efficient solution of block Toeplitz systems with multiple right-hand sides arising from a periodic boundary element formulation, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 130 (2021) 135–144. Crossref, Google Scholar
166. S. Marburg and S. Schneider, Performance of iterative solvers for acoustic problems. Part I. Solvers and effect of diagonal preconditioning, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 27 (2003) 727–750. Crossref, Google Scholar
167. S. Schneider and S. Marburg, Performance of iterative solvers for acoustic problems. Part II. Acceleration by ILU-type preconditioner, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 27 (2003) 751–757. Crossref, Google Scholar
168. M. Bebendorf, Hierarchical LU decomposition-based preconditioners for BEM, Computing 74 (2004) 225–247. Crossref, Google Scholar
169. T. Takahashi, C. Chen and E. Darve, Parallelization of the inverse fast multipole method with an application to boundary element method, Computer Physics Communications 247 (2020) 106975. Crossref, Google Scholar
170. S. Chaillat, L. Desiderio and P. Ciarlet, Theory and implementation of H-matrix based iterative and direct solvers for Helmholtz and elastodynamic oscillatory kernels, Journal of Computational Physics 351 (2017) 165–186. Crossref, Google Scholar
171. W. Y. Kong, J. Bremer and V. Rokhlin, An adaptive fast direct solver for boundary integral equations in two dimensions, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 31 (2011) 346–369. Crossref, Google Scholar
172. P. G. Martinsson, A fast randomized algorithm for computing a hierarchically semiseparable representation of a matrix, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 32 (2011) 1251–1274. Crossref, Google Scholar
173. K. L. Ho and L. Greengard, A fast direct solver for structured linear systems by recursive skeletonization, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 34 (2012) A2507–A2532. Crossref, Google Scholar
174. E. Corona, P.-G. Martinsson and D. Zorin, An O(n) direct solver for integral equations on the plane, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 38 (2015) 284–317. Crossref, Google Scholar
175. D. Sushnikova, L. Greengard, M. O’Neil and M. Rachh, FMM-LU: A fast direct solver for multiscale boundary integral equations in three dimensions (2022), arXiv:2201.07325, Preprint. Google Scholar
176. P. R. Andersen, V. Cutanda Henríquez and N. Aage, Shape optimization of micro-acoustic devices including viscous and thermal losses, Journal of Sound and Vibration 447 (2019) 120–136. Crossref, Google Scholar
177. V. Cutanda Henríquez and P. R. Andersen, A three-dimensional acoustic boundary element method formulation with viscous and thermal losses based on shape function derivatives, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 26 (2018) 1850039. Link, Google Scholar
178. V. Cutanda Henríquez, P. R. Andersen, J. S. Jensen, P. M. Juhl and J. Sánchez-Dehesa, A numerical model of an acoustic metamaterial using the boundary element method including viscous and thermal losses, Journal of Computational Acoustics 25 (2017) 1750006. Link, Google Scholar
179. V. Cutanda Henríquez, V. M. García-Chocano and J. Sánchez-Dehesa, Viscothermal losses in double-negative acoustic metamaterials, Physical Review Applied 8 (2017) 014029. Crossref, Google Scholar
180. V. Cutanda Henríquez and J. Sánchez-Dehesa, Viscothermal effects in a two-dimensional acoustic black hole: A boundary element approach, Physical Review Applied 15 (2021) 064057. Crossref, Google Scholar
181. C. Gurbuz, J. D. Schmid, M. Luegmair and S. Marburg, Energy density-based non-negative surface contributions in interior acoustics, Journal of Sound and Vibration 527 (2022) 116824. Crossref, Google Scholar
182. J. M. Schmid, E. Fernandez-Grande, M. Hahmann, C. Gurbuz, M. Eser and S. Marburg, Spatial reconstruction of the sound field in a room in the modal frequency range using Bayesian inference, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 150 (2021) 4385–4394. Crossref, Google Scholar
183. G. Kirchhoff, Über den Einfluss der Wärmeleitung in einem Gase auf die Schallbewegung, Annalen der Physik und Chemie 210 (1868) 177–193. Crossref, Google Scholar
184. C. Zwikker and C. W. Kosten, Sound Absorbing Materials (Elsevier Pub. Co., New York, 1949). Google Scholar
185. W. M. Beltman, P. J. M. van der Hoogt, R. M. E. J. Spiering and H. Tijdeman, Implementation and experimental validation for a new viscothermal acoustic finite element method for acousto-elastic problems, Journal of Sound and Vibration 216 (1998) 159–185. Crossref, Google Scholar
186. H. Tijdeman, On the propagation of sound waves in cylindrical tubes, Journal of Sound and Vibration 39 (1975) 1–33. Crossref, Google Scholar
187. M. Berggren, A. Bernland and D. Noreland, Acoustic boundary layers as boundary conditions, Journal of Computational Physics 371 (2018) 633–650. Crossref, Google Scholar
188. R. Bossart, N. Joly and M. Bruneau, Hybrid numerical and analytical solutions for acoustic boundary problems in thermo-viscous fluids, Journal of Sound and Vibration 263 (2003) 69–84. Crossref, Google Scholar
189. K. Schmidt and A. Thöns-Zueva, Impedance boundary conditions for acoustic time-harmonic wave propagation in viscous gases in two dimensions, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 45 (2022) 7404–7425. Crossref, Google Scholar
190. N. A. Jean and F. Allard, Propagation of Sound in Porous Media (John Wiley & Sons, 2009). Google Scholar
191. E. Sarradj, Multi-domain boundary element method for sound fields in and around porous absorbers, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 89 (2003) 21–27. Google Scholar
192. N. Jiménez, T. J. Cox, V. Romero-García and J.-P. Groby, Metadiffusers: Deep-subwavelength sound diffusers, Scientific Reports 7 (2017) 5389. Crossref, Google Scholar
193. M. Malinen, M. Lyly, P. Råback, A. Kärkkäinen and L. Kärkkäinen, A finite element method for the modeling of thermo-viscous effects in acoustics, in Proceedings of the 4th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS), eds. P. Neittaanmäki, T. Rossi, K. Majava and O. Pironneau (University of Jyväskyä, Department of Mathematical Information Technology, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2004). Google Scholar
194. L. Cheng, R. D. White and K. Grosh, Three-dimensional viscous finite element formulation for acoustic fluid–structure interaction, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 197 (2008) 4160–4172. Crossref, Google Scholar
195. N. Joly, M. Bruneau and R. Bossart, Coupled equations for particle velocity and temperature variation as the fundamental formulation of linear acoustics in thermo-viscous fluid at rest, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92 (2006) 202–209. Google Scholar
196. W. R. Kampinga, Y. H. Wijnant and A. de Boer, Performance of several viscothermal acoustic finite elements, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 96 (2010) 115–124. Crossref, Google Scholar
197. W. R. Kampinga, Y. H. Wijnant and A. de Boer, An efficient finite element model for viscothermal acoustics, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 97 (2011) 618–631. Crossref, Google Scholar
198. P. R. Andersen, V. Cutanda Henríquez, N. Aage and S. Marburg, A two-dimensional acoustic tangential derivative boundary element method including viscous and thermal losses, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 26 (2018) 1850036. Link, Google Scholar
199. V. Cutanda Henríquez and P. M. Juhl, An axisymmetric boundary element formulation of sound wave propagation in fluids including viscous and thermal losses, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (2013) 3409–3418. Crossref, Google Scholar
200. M. Bruneau, P. Herzog, J. Kergomard and J. D. Polack, General formulation of the dispersion equation in bounded visco-thermal fluid, and application to some simple geometries, Wave Motion 11 (1989) 441–451. Crossref, Google Scholar
201. E. Dokumaci, An integral equation formulation for boundary element analysis of acoustic radiation problems in viscous fluids, Journal of Sound and Vibration 147 (1991) 335–348. Crossref, Google Scholar
202. E. Dokumaci, Prediction of the effects of entropy fluctuations on sound radiation from vibrating bodies using an integral equation approach, Journal of Sound and Vibration 186 (1995) 805–819. Crossref, Google Scholar
203. C. Karra and M. B. Tahar, An integral equation formulation for boundary element analysis of propagation in viscothermal fluids, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1997) 1311–1318. Crossref, Google Scholar
204. V. Cutanda Henríquez and P. M. Juhl, Implementation of an acoustic 3D BEM with visco-thermal losses, in Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), ed. W. Talasch (Austrian Noise Abatement Association, Innsbruck, Austria, 2014), pp. 5576–5583. Google Scholar
205. P. M. Juhl and V. Cutanda Henríquez, Verification of an acoustic 3D BEM with visco-thermal losses, in Proceedings of the 42nd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), ed. W. Talasch (Austrian Noise Abatement Association, Innsbruck, Austria, 2013), pp. 1882–1888. Google Scholar
206. V. Cutanda Henríquez and P. M. Juhl, Implementation aspects of the boundary element method including viscous and thermal losses, in Proceedings of the 43rd International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), eds. J. Davy, C. Don, T. McMinn, L. Dowsett, N. Broner and M. Burgess (Melbourne, Australia, 2014), pp. 5576–5583. Google Scholar
207. P. R. Andersen, V. Cutanda Henríquez, L. Godinho, J.-D. Chazot and J. Carbajo San Martín, Characterization of acoustic metasurface absorbers using numerical methods including viscous and thermal losses, in Proceedings of the 48th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering (INTERNOISE), ed. A. Calvo-Manzano, A. Delgado, A. Perez-Lopez and J. S. Santiago (Spanish Acoustical Society, Madrid, Spain, 2019), 5709–5719. Google Scholar
208. M. J. Cops, J. G. McDaniel, E. A. Magliula, D. J. Bamford and M. Berggren, Estimation of acoustic absorption in porous materials based on visco-thermal boundary layers modeled as boundary conditions, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148 (2020) 1624–1635. Crossref, Google Scholar
209. S. K. Baydoun and S. Marburg, Investigation of radiation damping in sandwich structures using finite and boundary element methods and a nonlinear eigensolver, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147 (2020) 2020–2034. Crossref, Google Scholar
210. S.-I. Ishiyama, M. Imai, S.-I. Maruyama, H. Ido, N. Sugiura and S. Suzuki, The applications of ACOUST/BOOM — A noise level predicting and reducing computer code, Technical report, SAE Technical Paper (SAE International, 1988), 880910. Google Scholar
211. R. A. Adey, S. M. Niku, J. Baynham and P. Burns, Predicting acoustic contributions and sensitivity. Application to vehicle structures, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment 11 (1995) 181–188. Google Scholar
212. S. Marburg, H.-J. Hardtke, R. Schmidt and D. Pawandenat, Application of the concept of acoustic influence coefficients for the optimization of a vehicle roof, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 20 (1997) 305–310. Crossref, Google Scholar
213. S. Marburg, Efficient optimization of a noise transfer function by modification of a shell structure geometry-part I: Theory, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 24 (2002) 51–59. Crossref, Google Scholar
214. J. P. Coyette, H. Wynendaele and M. K. Chargin, A global acoustic sensitivity tool for improving structural design, Proceedings — SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering 1923 (1993) 1389–1394. Google Scholar
215. J. Dong, K. K. Choi and N.-H. Kim, Design optimization of structural–acoustic problems using FEA–BEA with adjoint variable method, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (2004) 527–533. Crossref, Google Scholar
216. C. Joachim, D. Nefske and J. Wolf, Application of a structural-acoustic diagnostic technique to reduce boom noise in a passenger vehicle, Technical report, SAE Technical Paper (SAE International, 1981), 810398. Google Scholar
217. Y. Huang and Z. Cui, Recent developments for frequency domain analysis in LS-DYNA®, in Proceedings of the 11th European LS-DYNA Conference (DYNAmore GmbH, Salzburg, Austria, 2017). Google Scholar
218. K. Shaposhnikov and M. J. H. Jensen, Panel contribution analysis based on FEM, BEM and numerical Green’s function approaches, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 26 (2018) 1850037. Link, Google Scholar
219. E. G. Williams, Fourier Acoustics: Sound Radiation and Nearfield Acoustical Holography (Academic press, 1999). Google Scholar
220. M. R. Bai, Application of BEM–based acoustic holography to radiation analysis of sound sources with arbitrarily shaped geometries, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92 (1992) 533–549. Crossref, Google Scholar
221. N. P. Valdivia and E. G. Williams, Study of the comparison of the methods of equivalent sources and boundary element methods for near-field acoustic holography, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (2006) 3694–3705. Crossref, Google Scholar
222. N. Valdivia and E. G. Williams, Implicit methods of solution to integral formulations in boundary element method based nearfield acoustic holography, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (2004) 1559–1572. Crossref, Google Scholar
223. T. DeLillo, V. Isakov, N. Valdivia and L. Wang, The detection of surface vibrations from interior acoustical pressure, Inverse Problems 19 (2003) 507–524. Crossref, Google Scholar
224. N. Valdivia and E. G. Williams, Krylov subspace iterative methods for boundary element method based near-field acoustic holography, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (2005) 711–724. Crossref, Google Scholar
225. C.-X. Bi, Y. Zhang, X.-Z. Zhang and Y.-B. Zhang, Stability analysis of inverse time domain boundary element method for near-field acoustic holography, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143 (2018) 1308–1317. Crossref, Google Scholar
226. H. Wu, D. Li, L. Yu and W. Jiang, A boundary element method based near field acoustic holography in noisy environments, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147 (2020) 3360–3371. Crossref, Google Scholar
227. E. G. Williams, B. H. Houston, P. C. Herdic, S. T. Raveendra and B. Gardner, Interior near-field acoustical holography in flight, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108 (2000) 1451–1463. Crossref, Google Scholar
228. B.-K. Kim and J.-G. Ih, On the reconstruction of the vibro-acoustic field over the surface enclosing an interior space using the boundary element method, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (1996) 3003–3016. Crossref, Google Scholar
229. T. Kletschkowski, M. Weber and D. Sachau, Identification of noise sources in an aircraft fuselage using an inverse method based on a finite element model, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 97 (2011) 974–983. Crossref, Google Scholar
230. S. F. Wu, On reconstruction of acoustic pressure fields using the Helmholtz equation least squares method, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (2000) 2511–2522. Crossref, Google Scholar
231. S. F. Wu, The Helmholtz equation least-squares method, in The Helmholtz Equation Least Squares Method (Springer, 2015), pp. 27–62. Crossref, Google Scholar
232. Z. Wang and S. F. Wu, Helmholtz equation–least-squares method for reconstructing the acoustic pressure field, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1997) 2020–2032. Crossref, Google Scholar
233. X. Zhao and S. F. Wu, Reconstruction of vibroacoustic fields in half-space by using hybrid near-field acoustical holography, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (2005) 555–565. Crossref, Google Scholar
234. S. F. Wu and L. K. Natarajan, Panel acoustic contribution analysis, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (2013) 799–809. Crossref, Google Scholar
235. M. B. S. Magalhaes and R. A. Tenenbaum, Sound sources reconstruction techniques: A review of their evolution and new trends, Acta Acustica united with Acustica 90 (2004) 199–220. Google Scholar
236. E. G. Williams, Supersonic acoustic intensity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1995) 121–127. Crossref, Google Scholar
237. E. Fernandez-Grande, F. Jacobsen and Q. Leclere, Direct formulation of the supersonic acoustic intensity in space domain, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131 (2012) 186–193. Crossref, Google Scholar
238. S. Marburg, E. Lösche, H. Peters and N. Kessissoglou, Surface contributions to radiated sound power, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (2013) 3700–3705. Crossref, Google Scholar
239. C. A. Corrêa Junior and R. A. Tenenbaum, Useful intensity: A technique to identify radiating regions on arbitrarily shaped surfaces, Journal of Sound and Vibration 332 (2013) 1567–1584. Crossref, Google Scholar
240. E. G. Williams, Convolution formulations for non-negative intensity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (2013) 1055–1066. Crossref, Google Scholar
241. D. Liu, H. Peters, S. Marburg and N. Kessissoglou, Surface contributions to scattered sound power using non-negative intensity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (2016) 1206–1217. Crossref, Google Scholar
242. D. Liu, Z. Havránek, S. Marburg, H. Peters and N. Kessissoglou, Non-negative intensity and back-calculated non-negative intensity for analysis of directional structure-borne sound, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (2017) 117–123. Crossref, Google Scholar
243. D. Liu, H. Peters, S. Marburg and N. Kessissoglou, Supersonic intensity and non-negative intensity for prediction of radiated sound, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139 (2016) 2797–2806. Crossref, Google Scholar
244. D. R. Wilkes, H. Peters, P. Croaker, S. Marburg, A. J. Duncan and N. Kessissoglou, Non-negative intensity for coupled fluid–structure interaction problems using the fast multipole method, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (2017) 4278–4288. Crossref, Google Scholar
245. D. Liu, S. Marburg and N. Kessissoglou, Non-negative intensity for target strength identification in marine ecosystem research, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 30 (2022) 2150023. Link, Google Scholar
246. M. Karimi, L. Maxit, V. Meyer, S. Marburg and R. Kirby, Non-negative intensity for planar structures under stochastic excitation, Journal of Sound and Vibration 488 (2020) 115652. Crossref, Google Scholar
247. D. Liu, S. Marburg, C. Geweth and N. Kessissoglou, Non-negative intensity for structures with inhomogeneous damping, Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics 27 (2019) 1850050. Link, Google Scholar
248. S. D. Sommerfeldt and P. J. Nashif, An adaptive filtered-x algorithm for energy-based active control, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96 (1994) 300–306. Crossref, Google Scholar
249. N. Tanaka and K. Kobayashi, Cluster control of acoustic potential energy in a structural/acoustic cavity, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (2006) 2758–2771. Crossref, Google Scholar
250. G. H. Koopmann and J. B. Fahnline, Designing quiet structures: A sound power minimization approach (Academic Press, 1997). Google Scholar
251. B. S. Cazzolato and C. H. Hansen, Active control of sound transmission using structural error sensing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104 (1998) 2878–2889. Crossref, Google Scholar
252. B. S. Cazzolato, Sensing systems for active control of sound transmission into cavities, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, 1999. Google Scholar
253. B. S. Cazzolato and C. H. Hansen, Errors arising from three-dimensional energy density sensing in one-dimensional sound fields, Journal of Sound and Vibration 236 (2000) 375–400. Crossref, Google Scholar

Vol. 30, No. 03

Metrics

Downloaded 828 times

History

Received 21 July 2022

Accepted 8 September 2022

Published: 30 September 2022

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Recent Advances in Acoustic Boundary Element Methods

Abstract

Recommended