Open Access

A Pollution Effect in the Boundary Element Method for Acoustic Problems

Steffen Marburg

Institute of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany

E-mail Address: steffen.marburg@tum.de

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S2591728518500184Cited by:39 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The pollution effect is a well-known and well-investigated phenomenon of the finite element method for wave problems in general and for acoustic problems in particular. It is understood as the problem that a local mesh refinement cannot compensate the numerical error which is generated and accumulated in other regions of the model. This is the case for the phase error of the finite element method which leads to dispersion resulting in very large numerical errors for domains with many waves in them and is of particular importance for low order elements. Former investigations have shown that a pollution effect resulting from dispersion is unlikely for the boundary element method. However, numerical damping in the boundary element method can account for a pollution effect. A further investigation of numerical damping reveals that it has similar consequences as the phase error of the finite element method. One of these consequences is that the number of waves within the domain may be controlling the discretization error in addition to the size and the order of the boundary elements. This will be demonstrated in computational examples discussing traveling waves in rectangular ducts. Different lengths, element types and mesh sizes are tested for the boundary element collocation method. In addition to the amplitude error which is due to numerical damping, a rather small phase error is observed. This may indicate numerical dispersion.

Dedicated to Professor Frank Ihlenburg on the occasion of his 60th birthday.

Keywords:

References

1. M. Ainsworth , Discrete dispersion relation for hp-version finite element approximation at high wave number, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004) 553–575. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. I. Babuška, F. Ihlenburg, E. T. Paik and S. A. Sauter , A generalized finite element method for solving the Helmholtz equation in two dimensions with minimal pollution, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 128 (1995) 325–359. Crossref, Google Scholar
3. I. Babuška and S. A. Sauter , Is the pollution effect of the fem avoidable for the Helmholtz equation considering high wave numbers? SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997) 2392–2423. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. A. Bayliss, C. I. Goldstein and E. Turkel , On accuracy conditions for the numerical computation of waves, J. Comput. Phys. 59 (1985) 396–404. Crossref, Google Scholar
5. A. Deraemaeker, I. Babuška and P. Bouillard , Dispersion and pollution of the fem solution for the Helmholtz equation in one, two and three dimensions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 46 (1999) 471–499. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. J. B. Fahnline , Numerical difficulties with boundary element solutions of interior acoustic problems, J. Sound Vib. 319 (2009) 1083–1096. Crossref, Google Scholar
7. K. Gerdes and F. Ihlenburg , On the pollution effect in Fe solutions of the 3D–Helmholtz equation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 170 (1999) 155–172. Crossref, Google Scholar
8. I. G. Graham, M. Löhndorf, J. M. Melenk and E. A. Spence , When is the error in the h–BEM for solving the Helmholtz equation bounded independently of $k$ ? BIT Numerical Mathematics 55 (2015) 171–214. Crossref, Google Scholar
9. I. Harari , A survey of finite element methods for time–harmonic acoustics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (2006) 1594–1607. Crossref, Google Scholar
10. I. Harari , Dispersion, pollution, and resolution, in S. Marburg and B. Nolte , editors, Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, Chap. 1 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 37–56. Crossref, Google Scholar
11. Z. C. He, G. R. Liu, Z. H. Zhong, S. C. Wu, G. Y. Zhang and A. G. Cheng , An edge–based smoothed finite element method (es–fem) for analyzing three–dimensional acoustic problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199 (2009) 20–33. Crossref, Google Scholar
12. M. Hornikx, M. Kaltenbacher and S. Marburg , A platform for benchmark cases in computational acoustics, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 101 (2015) 811–820. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. F. Ihlenburg , Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering, Volume 132 of Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1998). Crossref, Google Scholar
14. F. Ihlenburg , The medium–frequency range in computational acoustics: Practical and numerical aspects, J. Comput. Acoust. 11 (2003) 175–193. Link, Google Scholar
15. F. Ihlenburg and I. Babuška , Dispersion analysis and error estimation of Galerkin finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 38 (1995) 3745–3774. Crossref, Google Scholar
16. F. Ihlenburg and I. Babuška , Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wave number. Part I: The $h$ version of the fem, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 30 (1995) 9–37. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. P. Langer, M. Maeder, C. Guist, M. Krause and S. Marburg , More than six elements per wavelength: The practical use of structural finite element models and their accuracy in comparison with experimental results, J. Comput. Acoust. 25 (2017) 1750025. Link, Google Scholar
18. S. Marburg , Explicit frequency dependent matrices in the BE formulation, in Sound and Silence: Setting the Balance — Proceedings of the INTERNOISE98, Volume 3, pages 1533–1536 (New Zealand Acoustical Society Inc., Christchurch, 1998). Google Scholar
19. S. Marburg , Six boundary elements per wavelength, Is that enough? J. Comput. Acoust. 10(1) (2002) 25–51. Link, Google Scholar
20. S. Marburg , Normal modes in external acoustics. Part I: Investigation of the one–dimensional duct problem, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 91 (2005) 1063–1078. Google Scholar
21. S. Marburg and S. Amini , Cat’s eye radiation with boundary elements: Comparative study on treatment of irregular frequencies, J. Comput. Acoust. 13 (2005) 21–45. Link, Google Scholar
22. S. Marburg , Discretization requirements: How many elements per wavelength are necessary? in S. Marburg and B. Nolte , editors, Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, Chap. 11 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 309–332. Crossref, Google Scholar
23. S. Marburg , The Burton and Miller method: Unlocking another mystery of its coupling parameter, J. Comput. Acoust. 24 (2016) 1550016. Link, Google Scholar
24. S. Marburg , Numerical damping in the acoustic boundary element method, Acta Acustica United with Acustica 102 (2016) 415–418. Crossref, Google Scholar
25. S. Marburg , Boundary element method for time–harmonic acoustic problems, in M. Kaltenbacher , editor, Computational Acoustics, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Courses and Lectures, Vol. 579 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017), pp. 69–158. Google Scholar
26. S. Marburg and R. Anderssohn , Fluid structure interaction and admittance boundary conditions: Setup of an analytical example, J. Comput. Acoust. 19 (2011) 63–74. Link, Google Scholar
27. S. Marburg and B. Nolte , A unified approach to finite and boundary element discretization in linear time–harmonic acoustics, in S. Marburg and B. Nolte , editors, Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids. Finite and Boundary Element Methods, Chap. 0 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 1–34. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. S. Marburg and S. Schneider , Influence of element types on numeric error for acoustic boundary elements, J. Comput. Acoust. 11 (2003) 363–386. Link, Google Scholar
29. S. Marburg and S. Schneider , Performance of iterative solvers for acoustic problems. Part I: Solvers and effect of diagonal preconditioning, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 27(7) (2003) 727–750. Crossref, Google Scholar
30. F. Mattioli , Numerical instabilities of the integral approach to the interior boundary–value problem for the two–dimensional Helmholtz equation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 15 (1980) 1303–1313. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. H. Peters, N. J. Kessissoglou and S. Marburg , Enforcing reciprocity in numerical analysis of acoustic radiation modes and sound power evaluation, J. Comput. Acoust. 20 (2012) 1250005. Link, Google Scholar
32. H. Peters, S. Marburg and N. J. Kessissoglou , Structural–acoustic coupling on non–conforming meshes with quadratic shape functions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 91 (2012) 27–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
33. S. Retka, L. Hervella-Nieto and S. Marburg , Comparison of pressure and displacement formulations for finite elements in linear time-harmonic acoustics, Computers and Structures 151 (2015) 49–57. Crossref, Google Scholar
34. Y. Saad and M. H. Schultz , GMRES: A generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving non–symmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7 (1986) 856–869. Crossref, Google Scholar
35. L. L. Thompson and P. M. Pinsky , Complex wavenumber Fourier analysis of the p–version finite element method, Comput. Mech. 13 (1994) 255–275. Crossref, Google Scholar
36. K. Wang and Y. S. Wong , Is pollution effect of finite difference schemes avoidable for multi–dimensional Helmholtz equations with high wave numbers? Communications in Computational Physics 21 (2017) 490–514. Crossref, Google Scholar
37. L. Yao, Y. Li and L. Li , Dispersion error reduction for acoustic problems using the smoothed finite element method (sfem), Int. J. Numer. Methods in Fluids 80 (2016) 343–357. Crossref, Google Scholar
38. A. Young, M. Young and B. Johnson, Rock and roll ain’t noise pollution, in: AC/DC Back in Black, page 2, number 5, 1980. Google Scholar
39. C.-J. Zheng, H.-B. Chen, H.-F. Gao and L. Du , Is the Burton–Miller formulation really free of fictitious eigenfrequencies? Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 59 (2015) 43–51. Crossref, Google Scholar

Vol. 26, No. 02

Metrics

Downloaded 493 times

History

Received 14 April 2017

Accepted 5 December 2017

Published: 4 January 2018

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License. Further distribution of this work is permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

A Pollution Effect in the Boundary Element Method for Acoustic Problems

Abstract

Recommended