World Scientific
  • Search
    Quick Search in Journals
    Access type:
    Quick Search anywhere
    Access type:
    Advanced Search
  • My Cart
  •   
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

Our site uses Javascript to enchance its usability.You can disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com to view the full content.

Select your blocker:

Adblock Plus Instructions

  1. Click the AdBlock Plus icon in the extension bar
  2. Click the blue power button
  3. Click refresh
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
Research PaperNo Access

A Novel Two-Stage Structural Damage Identification Method Based on Superposition of Modal Flexibility Curvature and Whale Optimization Algorithm

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455421501698Cited by:19 (Source: Crossref)
    Previous
    Next

    Abstract

    A novel two-stage method is proposed to properly identify the location and severity of damage in plate structures. In the first stage, a superposition of modal flexibility curvature (SMFC) is adopted to locate the damage accurately, and the identification index of modal flexibility matrix is improved. The low-order modal parameters are used and a new column matrix is formed based on the modal flexibility matrix before and after the structure is damaged. The difference of modal flexibility matrix is obtained, which is used as a damage identification index. Meanwhile, based on SMFC, a method of weakening the “vicinity effect” is proposed to eliminate the impact of the surrounding elements to the damaged elements when damage identification is carried out for the plate-type structure. In the second stage, the objective function based on the flexibility matrix is constructed, and according to the damage location identified in the first stage, the actual damage severity is determined by the enhanced whale optimization algorithm (EWOA). In addition, the effects of 3% and 10% noise on damage location and severity estimation are also studied. By taking a simply supported beam and a four-side simply supported plate as examples, the results show that the method can accurately estimate the damage location and quantify the damage severity without noise. When considering noise, the increase of noise level will not affect the assessment of damage location, but the error of quantifying damage severity will increase. In addition, damage identification of a steel-concrete composite bridge (I-40 Bridge) under four damage cases is carried out, and the results show that the modified method can evaluate the damage location and quantify 5%–92% of the damage severity.

    References

    • 1. C. R. Farrar and K. Worden , An introduction to structural health monitoring, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365(1851) (2007) 303–315. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 2. S. Beygzadeh, E. Salajegheh and P. Torkzadeh , An improved genetic algorithm for optimal sensor placement in space structures damage detection, Int. J. Space. Struct. 29(3) (2014) 121–136. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 3. D. Goyal and B. S. Pabla , The vibration monitoring methods and signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 23(3) (2016) 585–594. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 4. W. Fan and P. Z. Qiao , Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study, Struct. Health Monit. 10(1) (2011) 83–111. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 5. A. S. S. Naser, J. Salajegheh, E. Salajegheh and M. J. Fadaee , An improved genetic algorithm using sensitivity analysis and micro search for damage detection, Asian J. Civil Eng. 11 (2010) 717–740. Google Scholar
    • 6. J. B. Kim, E. T. Lee and S. Rahmatalla , Non-baseline damage detection based on the deviation of displacement mode shape data, J. Nondestr. Eval. 32(1) (2013) 14–24. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 7. C. R. Farrar and D. A. Jauregui , Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I, Smart Mater. Struct. 7(5) (1998) 704. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 8. R. G. Lauzon and J. T. DeWolf , Ambient vibration monitoring of a highway bridge undergoing a destructive test, J. Bridge Eng. 11(5) (2006) 602–610. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 9. J. Maeck and G. DeRoeck , Damage assessment using vibration analysis on the Z24-bridge, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 17(1) (2003) 133–142. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 10. M. Raghavendrachar and A. E. Aktan , Flexibility by multireference impact testing for bridge diagnostics, J. Struct. Eng. 118(8) (1992) 2186–2203. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 11. J. Zhao and J. T. DeWolf , Sensitivity study for vibrational parameters used in damage detection, J. Struct. Eng. 125(4) (1999) 410–416. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 12. A. K. Pandey and M. Biswas , Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility, J. Sound Vib. 169(1) (1994) 3–17. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 13. S. M. Esfarjani , Structural damage detection using modal flexibility method in honeycomb composite sandwich beam, Rom. J. Acoust. Vib. 17(1) (2020) 51–56. ISI, Google Scholar
    • 14. W. R. Wickramasinghe, D. P. Thambiratnam and T. H. T. Chan , Damage detection in a suspension bridge using modal flexibility method, Eng. Fail. Anal. 107 (2020) 104194. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 15. A. C. Altunışık, F. Y. Okur, S. Karaca and V. Kahya , Vibration-based damage detection in beam structures with multiple cracks: Modal curvature vs. modal flexibility methods, Nondestr. Test. Eval. 34(1) (2019) 33–53. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 16. K. Liu, R. J. Yan and C. G. Soares , Damage identification in offshore jacket structures based on modal flexibility, Ocean Eng. 170 (2018) 171–185. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 17. S. M. Seyedpoor , A two stage method for structural damage detection using a modal strain energy based index and particle swarm optimization, Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 47(1) (2012) 1–8. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 18. P. Torkzadeh, Y. Goodarzi and E. Salajegheh , A two-stage damage detection method for large-scale structures by kinetic and modal strain energies using heuristic particle swarm optimization, Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng. 3 (2013) 465–482. Google Scholar
    • 19. N. Fallah, S. R. H. Vaez and A. Mohammadzadeh , Multi-damage identification of large-scale truss structures using a two-step approach, J. Build. Eng. 19 (2018) 494–505. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 20. S. A. Ravanfar, H. A. Razak, Z. Ismail and S. J. S. Hakim , A two-step damage identification approach for beam structures based on wavelet transform and genetic algorithm, Meccanica 51(3) (2016) 635–653. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 21. S. M. Seyedpoor and M. H. Nopour , A two-step method for damage identification in moment frame connections using support vector machine and differential evolution algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput. 88 (2020) 106008. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 22. S. X. Zhang, Z. Y. Wang, Z. K. Jian, G. Y. Liu and X. J. Liu , A two-step method for beam bridge damage identification based on strain response reconstruction and statistical theory, Meas. Sci. Technol. 31(7) (2020) 075008. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 23. D. Tan, Z. R. Lu and J. K. Liu , A two-step method for damage identification in beam structures based on influence line difference and acceleration data, Adv. Mech. Eng. 10(7) (2018) 1687814018787404. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 24. F. Li, L. J. Li, J. Han and Z. F. Wang , A new two-step method for damage identification in Beam type structure, IEEE Access 1 (2019) 198–203. Google Scholar
    • 25. H. Kordestani, C. W. Zhang and M. Shadabfa , Beam damage detection under a moving load using random decrement technique and Savitzky–Golay filter, Sensors 20(1) (2020) 243. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 26. H. Kordestani and C. W. Zhang , Direct use of the Savitzky–Golay filter to develop an output-only trend line-based damage detection method, Sensors 20(7) (2020) 1983. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 27. Y. Z. Fu, J. K. Liu and Z. T. Wei , A two-step approach for damage identification in plates, J. Vib. Control 22(13) (2016) 3018–3031. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 28. G. F. Gomes and R. S. Giovani , An efficient two-step damage identification method using sunflower optimization algorithm and mode shape curvature (MSDBI–SFO), Eng. Comput. (2020) 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01128-2. ISI, Google Scholar
    • 29. Z. B. Yang, X. F. Chen, Y. Xie, H. H. Miao, J. J. Gao and K. Z. Qi , Hybrid two-step method of damage detection for plate-like structures, Struct. Control Health Monit. 23(2) (2016) 267–285. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 30. T. Vo-Duy, V. Ho-Huu, H. Dang-Trung and T. Nguyen-Thoi , A two-step approach for damage detection in laminated composite structures using modal strain energy method and an improved differential evolution algorithm, Compos. Struct. 147 (2016) 42–53. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 31. M. S. Huang, X. F. Li, Y. Z. Lei and J. F. Gu , Structural damage identification based on modal frequency strain energy assurance criterion and flexibility using enhanced Moth-Flame optimization, Structures 28 (2020) 1119–1136. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 32. S. Weng et al., Improved substructuring method for eigensolutions of large-scale structures, J. Sound. Vib. 323(3–5) (2009) 718–736. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 33. Y. M. Li, X. Y. Zhou and X. Y. Gao , Detection indicator of structural nondestructive damage based on curvature-flexibility-difference matrix, Eng. Mech. 26(2) (2009) 188–195 (in Chinese). Google Scholar
    • 34. X. Y. Liu, T. X. Jiang and G. H. Wang , Research on the method of structural damage detection based on modal flexibility matrix, J. Changsha Univ. 31(3) (2017) 15–19 (in Chinese). Google Scholar
    • 35. C. S. N. Pathirage, J. Li and L. Li , Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning, Eng. Struct. 172(1) (2018) 13–28. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 36. C. Yang, X. B. Hou and L. Wang , Applications of different criteria in structural damage identification based on natural frequency and static displacement, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59(11) (2016) 1746–1758. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 37. W. Xu et al., Non-uniform crack identification in plate-like structures using wavelet 2D modal curvature under noisy conditions, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 126 (2019) 469–489. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 38. R. Ghiasi, H. Fathnejat and P. Torkzadeh , A three-stage damage detection method for large-scale space structures using forward substructuring approach and enhanced bat optimization algorithm, Eng. Comput. 35(3) (2019) 857–874. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 39. K. D. Nguyen, T. H. T. Chan and D. P. Thambiratnam , Structural damage identification based on change in geometric modal strain energy–eigenvalue ratio, Smart Mater. Struct. 25 (2016) 075032. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 40. H. A. Zare, A. G. Ghodrati and K. Y. Koo , Optimization-based method for structural damage localization and quantification by means of static displacements computed by flexibility matrix, Eng. Optim. 48(4) (2016) 543–561. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 41. A. Z. Hosseinzadeh, G. G. Amiri and S. A. S. Razzaghi , Structural damage detection using sparse sensors installation by optimization procedure based on the modal flexibility matrix, J. Sound Vib. 381 (2016) 65–82. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 42. S. Z. Mehrian, S. A. R. Amrei and M. Maniat , Structural health monitoring using optimising algorithms based on flexibility matrix approach and combination of natural frequencies and mode shapes, Int. J. Struct. Eng. 7(4) (2016) 398–411. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 43. S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis , The whale optimization algorithm, Adv. Eng. Softw. 95 (2016) 51–67. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 44. Y. Q. Zhou, Y. Ling and Q. F. Luo , Levy flight trajectory based whale optimization algorithm for global optimization, IEEE Access 99 (2017) 6168–6186. Google Scholar
    • 45. D. L. Chu, H. Chen and Z. J. Xuan , Blind source separation based improved whale optimization algorithm, J. Dete. Control. 40(5) (2018) 76–81 (in Chinese). Google Scholar
    • 46. W. Z. Sun, J. S. Wang and X. Wei , An improved whale optimization algorithm based on different searching paths and perceptual disturbance, Symmetry 10(6) (2018) 210. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 47. A. Kaveh and M. I. Ghazaan , Enhanced whale optimization algorithm for sizing optimization of skeletal structures, Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 45(3) (2017) 345–362. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 48. M. H. Qais, H. M. Hasanien and S. Alghuwainem , Enhanced whale optimization algorithm for maximum power point tracking of variable-speed wind generators, Appl. Soft Comput. 86 (2020) 105937. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 49. T. Back , Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms (Oxford University Press, 1996). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 50. H. Kordestani et al., Localization of damaged cable in a tied-arch bridge using Arias intensity of seismic acceleration response, Struct. Control Health Monit. 27(3) (2020) e2491. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 51. M. Georgioudakis and V. Plevris , A combined modal correlation criterion for structural damage identification with noisy modal data, Adv. Civil Eng. 2018 (2018) 3183067. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 52. Y. H. An and J. P. Ou , Damage localization based on the curvature difference probability method of waveform fractal dimension with stochastic excitation, J. Vib. Meas. Diag. 34(3) (2014) 426–432 (in Chinese), https://doi.org/10.2172/10158042. Google Scholar
    • 53. C. R. Farrar, W. E. Baker and T. M. Bell, Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande. Report no. LA-12767-MS (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1994). Google Scholar
    • 54. M. S. Huang, Y. Z. Lei and S. X. Cheng , Damage identification of bridge structure considering temperature variations based on particle swarm optimization-cuckoo search algorithm, Adv. Struct. Eng. 22(15) (2019) 3262–3276. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 55. V. M. Naranjo, Damage detection based upon modern experimental and numerical dynamic analysis techniques for mechanical structures (Schadedetectie op basis van moderne experimentele en numerieke dynamische analysetechnieken voor mechanische structuren) (Ku Leuven, Nederland, 2010). Google Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Remember to check out the structures