Research PaperNo Access

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Design of the Air Rectification Cover for Super High-Speed Elevator

School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, Shandong Province, P. R. China

E-mail Address: zhangruijun@sdjzu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Hao Zhang

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5077-8828

School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, Shandong Province, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Zhe Yang

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9434-2188

School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455423500025Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

To reduce the aerodynamic load of super high-speed elevators, in this paper, the coefficient of drag $C_{d}$ $C_{d}$ and the coefficient of yawing moment $C_{y m}$ $C_{y m}$ of the elevator are selected as optimization objectives for the optimization of the air rectification cover (ARC) shape. The elliptic curve method was used to build the parametric model of the ARCs, six design variables were selected, and the design space of the ARC was determined. With the optimal Latin hypercube design method, the training points were selected, and the computational fluid dynamics numerical simulation was conducted to calculate the corresponding responses. Then, the relationship between the design variables and the responses was analyzed. The radial basis function (RBF) surrogate model of the relationship between the design variables and responses was constructed. Finally, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was employed to optimize the shape of the ARC. The results show that the $C_{d}$ $C_{d}$ and $C_{y m}$ $C_{y m}$ decrease by 16.51% and 60.92%, respectively, compared with the unoptimized ARC, indicating that the ARC designed in this paper is optimized and can effectively reduce the aerodynamic load. Furthermore, among all the design variables, the bluntness of the ARC in the $X$ $X$ -direction has the most significant effect on the aerodynamic load, and the height of the ARC ( $h_{1}$ $h_{1}$ and $h_{2}$ $h_{2}$ ) has the second most significant effect on the aerodynamic load of elevators.

Keywords:

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Remember to check out the structures

References

1. C. Baker, The flow around high speed trains, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 98(6–7) (2010) 277–298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.11.002. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Y. Liu et al., Influences of wind barriers on the train running safety on a highway-railway one-story bridge, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 21(14) (2021) 2140009. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. M. Sun et al., A simplified method for estimating the critical wind speed of moving vehicles on bridges under crosswinds, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22(5) (2022) 2250046. Link, Google Scholar
4. H. Gou et al., Dynamic response of high-speed train-track-bridge coupling system subjected to simultaneous wind and rain, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 21(11) (2021) 2150161. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. X. D. Li and K. Wang, Optimization of aerodynamic characteristic of high-speed elevator, J. Harb. Inst. Technol. 41(6) (2009) 82–86, https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEOE-EQEC.2009.5194697. Google Scholar
6. Y. Kawamura et al., 103 aerodynamic force suppression method for passing the counter weight in the ultra-high speed elevator, in Proc. Elevator, Escalator and Amusement Rides Conf., Vol. 2016 (2016), pp. 9–12, https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeearc.2016.9. Google Scholar
7. J. Zhang et al., Shand. Indus. Technol. 3 (2016) 193–195, doi: 10.16640/j.cnki.37-1222/t.2016.03.172. Google Scholar
8. T. Zeng, Aerodynamic optimization design of single-shaft multi-car high speed elevator in multiple operation conditions and its application, dissertation, Zhejiang University, China (2018). Google Scholar
9. X. P. Wang, Study on aerodynamic characteristic optimization and performance evaluation method of high speed elevator, dissertation, Zhejiang University, China (2019). Google Scholar
10. R. Li et al., Multi-objective optimization of a high-speed train head based on the FFD method, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 152 (2016) 41–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.03.003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. L. Zhang et al., Multi-objective aerodynamic optimization design of high-speed train head shape, J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. A 18(11) (2017) 841–854, https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1600764. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. L. Zhang et al., A multi-objective aerodynamic optimization design of a high-speed train head under crosswinds, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F-j Rai. 232(3) (2018) 895–912, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717701784. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. B. S. Yao, D. L. Guo and G. W. Yang, Aerodynamic optimization of high-speed train based on RBF mesh deformation, Chin. J. Theory Appl. Mech. 45(6) (2013) 982–986, https://doi.org/10.6052/0459-1879-13-111. Google Scholar
14. P. Xu and C. S. Jiang, Optimization design of laminar aerofoil based on genetic algorithms and hicks-henne shape function, J. Air Force Eng. Univ. 10(1) (2009) 13–16, https://doi.org/10.1360/972009-1551. Google Scholar
15. X. F. Ma and B. Y. Chen, Dynamic simulation of ultra-high-speed elevator system, J. Graph. 36(3) (2015) 397–401, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-302X.2015.03.012. Google Scholar
16. H. Jing et al., Aerodynamic characteristics analysis of ultra-high-speed elevator with different hoistway structures, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22(2) (2021) 2250020. Link, Google Scholar
17. H. Zhang et al., Variable universe fuzzy control of high-speed elevator horizontal vibration based on firefly algorithm and backpropagation fuzzy neural network, IEEE Access. 9 (2021) 57020–57032, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072648. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Z. Yang et al., Transverse vibration response of a super high-speed elevator under air disturbance, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 19(9) (2019) 1950103, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455419501037. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. W. C. Yang et al., Flow structure and aerodynamic behavior evolution during train entering tunnel with entrance in crosswind, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 175 (2018) 229–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.018. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. J. Niu et al., Numerical analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train with different train nose lengths, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 127 (2018) 188–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.08.041. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. X. Chen et al., Aerodynamic simulation of evacuated tube maglev trains with different streamlined designs, J. Modern Transp. 20(2) (2012) 115–120, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325788. Crossref, Google Scholar
22. E. Lorriaux, N. Bourabaa and F. Monnoyer, Aerodynamic optimization of railway motor coaches, in The Seventh World Cong. Railway Research (Montreal, Canada, 4–8 June 2006), pp. 1–10. Google Scholar
23. V. V. S. Vytla, P. Huang and R. Penmetsa, Multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization of high speed train nose using adaptive surrogate model, in Proc. 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., (Chicago, Illinoi, July 2010), pp. 25–34, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4383. Google Scholar
24. R. Jin and T. W. Simpson, Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria, Struct. Multidiscip. Opt. 23 (2001) 1–13. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Z. G. An, Application of radial basis function metamodel for optimization of sheet metal forming, dissertation, Chongqing University, China (2009). Google Scholar
26. N. Srinivas, Deb K Multi-Objective function optimizadon using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms, Evol. Comput. 2(3) (1995) 221–248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02. Crossref, Google Scholar
27. K. Deb et al., A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1917 (2000) 849–858, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83. Crossref, Google Scholar