No Access

The Influence of Knowledge Management on Dynamic Capabilities

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Universidad de Manizales, Carrera 9, No. 19-03, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

E-mail Address: aosorio@umanizales.edu.co

Department of Informatics and Computer Science, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Campus La Nubia, Bloque Q, Piso 2 Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

E-mail Address: lbermona@unal.edu.co

Search for more papers by this author

Luis Arturo Rosado-Salgado

Department of Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, Colombia Carrera 27 # 64-60, Campus Palogrande, Bloque F. Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

E-mail Address: larosados@unal.edu.co

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Carlos A. Osorio-Toro

Faculty of Accounting, Economic and Administrative Sciences, Universidad de Manizales Carrera 9, No. 19-03, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia

E-mail Address: cosoriot@umanizales.edu.co

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649221500453Cited by:6 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

This study evaluates the relationship between knowledge management (KM) and dynamic capabilities. This goal stems from a lack of research regarding the impact of KM on strategic organisational aspects, particularly in firms from emerging economies. Theoretically, the link between KM and dynamic capabilities (DC) is based on the knowledge-based view of the firm (KBV). This posits that knowledge, when appropriately managed, is the main source of strategic renewal for organisations. As such, hypotheses about the relationship between KM and the dimensions of DC were both formulated and tested, in 93 knowledge-intensive organisations in Colombia, using structural equation modelling. The results indicate that KM has a significant impact on dynamic capability dimensions. For practitioners, this study sheds light on the relevance of the implementation of KM initiatives, in order to activate DC in organisations.

Keywords:

References

Ahammad, MF, KW Glaister and E Gomes [2020] Strategic agility and human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100700. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Alavi, M and DE Leidner [2001] Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3250961. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Alegre, J, K Sengupta and R Lapiedra [2013] Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611417472. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Al-Zoubi, MO, A Alrowwad and R Masa’deh [2020] Exploring the relationships among tacit knowledge sharing, mentoring and employees’ abilities: The case of Al-Hikma pharmaceutical company in Jordan. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 50(1), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2019-0048. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Appleyard, MM [1996] How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171112. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Augier, M and DJ Teece [2009] Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization Science, 20(2), 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0424. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Bergman, J, A Jantunen and JM Saksa [2004] Managing knowledge creation and sharing–scenarios and dynamic capabilities in inter-industrial knowledge networks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 63–76, https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567639. Crossref, Google Scholar
Blome, C, T Schoenherr and D Eckstein [2014] The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.028. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Boland Jr RJ and RV Tenkasi [1995] Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.350. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Cabrera-Suárez, K, P De Saá-Pérez and D García-Almeida [2001] The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
Chiu, WH, HR Chi, YC Chang and MH Chen [2016] Dynamic capabilities and radical innovation performance in established firms: A structural model. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(8), 965–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1181735. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Choi, SY, YS Kang and H Lee [2008] The effects of socio-technical enablers on knowledge sharing: an exploratory examination. Journal of Information Science, 34(5), 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087710. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Čiutienė, R and EW Thattakath [2014] Influence of dynamic capabilities in creating disruptive innovation. Economics and Business, 26, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.7250/eb.2014.015. Crossref, Google Scholar
Coff, RW [1999] How buyers cope with uncertainty when acquiring firms in knowledge-intensive industries: Caveat emptor. Organization Science, 10(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.2.144. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Cohen, WM and DA Levinthal [1990] Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Collins, CJ and KG Smith [2006] Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Crossan, MM, HW Lane and RE White [1999] An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Curado, C and N Bontis [2006] The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2006.011747. Crossref, Google Scholar
Danneels, E [2002] The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.275. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Davenport, TH and P Klahr [1998] Managing customer support knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165950. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Davis, PE and JS Bendickson [2020] Strategic antecedents of innovation: Variance between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12478. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Dayan, R, P Heisig and F Matos [2017] Knowledge management as a factor for the formulation and implementation of organization strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2016-0068. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Denford, JS [2013] Building knowledge: Developing a knowledge-based dynamic capabilities typology. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315150. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
DiBella, AJ [2001] Learning Practices: Assessment and Action for Organizational Improvement. Pearson Higher Education. Google Scholar
Dominguez-Gonzalez, RV and TM Melo [2017] Linkage between dynamics capability and knowledge management factors: A structural equation model. Management Decision, 55(10), 2256–2276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2017-0180. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Drucker, PF [1993] Post-Capitalist Society. Harper Business. Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M and IM Prieto [2008] Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrative role for learning? British Journal of Management, 19(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00543.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, KM and SL Brown [1999] Patching. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 72–73. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, KM and JA Martin [2000] Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Felin, T and WS Hesterly [2007] The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ferraresi, AA, CO Quandt, SA dos Santos and JR Frega [2012] Knowledge management and strategic orientation: leveraging innovativeness and performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 688–701. http://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262754. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Filippini, R, WH Güttel and A Nosella [2012] Ambidexterity and the evolution of knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Gold, AH, A Malhotra and AH Segars [2001] Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Gooderham, PN [2007] Enhancing knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: A dynamic capabilities driven model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500119. Crossref, Google Scholar
Grant, RM [1996] Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Grant, SB [2016] Classifying emerging knowledge sharing practices and some insights into antecedents to social networking: A case in insurance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), 898–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0432. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hair JF Jr, GTM Hult, C Ringle and M Sarstedt [2016] A Primer on Partial least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. Google Scholar
Halawi, LA, JE Aronson and RV McCarthy [2005] Resource-based view of knowledge management for competitive advantage. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 75–86. https://commons.erau.edu/publication/319. Google Scholar
Henderson, R and I Cockburn [1994] Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150906. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Henseler, J, CM Ringle and M Sarstedt [2015] A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Henseler, J, G Hubona and PA Ray [2016] Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, GP and MP Healey [2011] Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500–1516. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.964. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, GP and P Sparrow [2002] The Competent Organization: A Psychological Analysis of the Strategic Management Process, Vol. 154. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar
Inkpen, AC and A Dinur [1998] Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.454. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Jansen, JJ, FA Van den Bosch and HW Volberda [2005] Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(4), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396721. Crossref, Google Scholar
Jean, RJ, RR Sinkovics and S Zagelmeyer [2018] Antecedents and innovation performance implications of MNC political ties in the Chinese automotive supply chain. Management International Review, 58(6), 995–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-018-0370-2. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Kogut, B and U Zander [1992] Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Liao, J, H Welsch and M Stoica [2003] Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth–oriented SMEs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00032. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Lichtenthaler, U and E Lichtenthaler [2009] A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Mahnke, V, T Pedersen and M Venzin [2005] The impact of knowledge management on MNC subsidiary performance: The role of absorptive capacity. MIR: Management International Review, 45(2), 101–119. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40836135. Google Scholar
Martín-de Castro, G [2015] Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.032. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Nguyen, QTN and PA Neck [2008] Knowledge management as dynamic capabilities: Does it work in emerging less developed countries? In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting and Management, pp. 1–18. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Queensland University of Technology (QUT). Google Scholar
Nickerson, JA and TR Zenger [2004] A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0093. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Nielsen, AP [2006] Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610679363. Crossref, Google Scholar
Nonaka, I [1994] A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Nunnally, JC and IH Bernstein [1967] Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
O’Connor, GC and CM McDermott [2004] The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.002. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Oliva, FL, MHG Couto, RF Santos and S Bresciani [2019] The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations. Management Decision, 57, 1960–1979. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0670. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Osorio-Londoño, AA, JC Naranjo-Valencia and G Calderón-Hernández [2020] Training and its influence on competitive strategy implementation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21381. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Pavlou, PA (2002). IT-enabled competitive advantage: The strategic role of IT on dynamic capabilities in collaborative product development partnerships. Dissertation Summary, University of Southern California, California. Google Scholar
Pavlou, PA and OA El Sawy [2011] Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Pemberton, JD and GH Stonehouse [2000] Organisational learning and knowledge assets–an essential partnership. The Learning Organization, 7(4), 1984–1994. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470010342351. Crossref, Google Scholar
Prieto, IM and M Easterby-Smith [2006] Dynamic capabilities and the role of organizational knowledge: An exploration. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000642. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Qandah, R, TS Suifan, R Masa’deh and BY Obeidat [2020] The impact of knowledge management capabilities on innovation in entrepreneurial companies in Jordan. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(4), 989–1014. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2020-2246. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ravishankar, MN and SL Pan [2013] Examining the influence of modularity and knowledge management (KM) on dynamic capabilities: Insights from a call center. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.08.003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Rebolledo, C and J Nollet [2011] Learning from suppliers in the aerospace industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.008. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ringle, CM, S Wende and JM Becker (2015). Smartpls 3. SmartPLS GmbH. Google Scholar
Sambharya, RB and J Lee [2014] Renewing dynamic capabilities globally: An empirical study of the world’s largest MNCs. Management International Review, 54(2), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-013-0199-7. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Schilke, O, S Hu and CE Helfat [2018] Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0014. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Schoenherr, T, DA Griffith and A Chandra [2014] Knowledge management in supply chains: The role of explicit and tacit knowledge. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12042. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Senivongse, C, A Bennet and S Mariano [2019] Clarifying absorptive capacity and dynamic capabilities dilemma in high dynamic market IT SMEs. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(3), 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-11-2018-0105. Web of Science, Google Scholar
Sun, J, S Song, K Wipawayangkool and JS Oh [2021] Roles of dynamic capabilities and knowledge management strategies on organizational performance. Information Development, 37(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919894377. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Tang, RW and SP Gudergan [2018] A meta-analysis of the international experience–ownership strategy relationship: A dynamic capabilities view. Management International Review, 58(4), 541–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-018-0349-z. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Teece, DJ, G Pisano and A Shuen [1997] Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Teece, DJ [2007] Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Teece, DJ [2012] Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Teece, DJ [2017] Towards a capability theory of (innovating) firms: Implications for management and policy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41, 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew063. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Teece, DJ [2018] Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Teece, DJ [2019] A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 53(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208. Crossref, Google Scholar
Tsai, W [2002] Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Valentim, L, JV Lisboa and M Franco [2016] Knowledge management practices and absorptive capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Is there really a linkage? R&D Management, 46(4), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12108. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Van der Borgh, M, M Cloodt and AGL Romme [2012] Value creation by knowledge-based ecosystems: evidence from a field study. R&D Management, 42(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00673.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
van Reijsen, J (2014). Knowledge perspectives on advancing dynamic capability. Doctoral Dissertation, University Utrecht. Google Scholar
Villar, C, J Alegre and J Pla-Barber [2014] Exploring the role of knowledge management practices on exports: A dynamic capabilities view. International Business Review, 23(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.008. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Von Krogh, G [1998] Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165947. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Vorhies, DW and M Harker [2000] The capabilities and perfor mance advantages of market-driven firms: An empirical investigation. Australian Journal of Management, 25(2), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620002500203. Crossref, Google Scholar
Wright, PM, BB Dunford and SA Snell [2001] Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700607. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zahra, SA and G George [2002] Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zahra, SA, HJ Sapienza and P Davidsson [2006] Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zheng, S, W Zhang and J Du [2011] Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of Knowledge Management 15(6), 1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179352. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zollo, M and SG Winter [2002] Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3086025. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zott, C [2003] Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.288. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Zouaghi, F, M Sánchez and MG Martínez [2018] Did the global financial crisis impact firms’ innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.011. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar