BRIEF REPORTSNo Access

OPTIMIZATION OF THE MECHANICAL STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF POLY(L-LACTIDE)/MULTI-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBE SCAFFOLDS USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

HASSAN ADELI

School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author

SHARIF HUSSEIN SHARIF ZEIN

School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author

SOON HUAT TAN

School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author

, and

ABDUL LATIF AHMAD

School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793292011002470Cited by:9 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In this study the response surface methodology (RSM) coupled with the central composite design (CCD) were used to optimize the mechanical strength properties of poly(L-lactide)/multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) scaffolds. The scaffolds were prepared by the freeze-extraction method. MWCNTs were incorporated into PLLA composite as a reinforcement agent in order to improve the strength properties of the scaffolds. The effect of process parameters such as ratio of PLLA/(PLLA + MWCNT) (93–100%), solvent amount (100–200 ml), freezing time (5–7 h) and immersing time (2–4 days) were studied using the design of experiment (DOE). Based on CCD, quadratic model was obtained and developed to correlate the process parameters to the strength of the scaffolds. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to determine the significant factors affecting the experimental design response (strength) of the scaffolds. The predicted values after optimization process were in good agreement with the experimental values. The model was able to accurately predict the response of strength with less than 5% error.

Keywords:

References

Ž. Lazi , Design of Experiments in Chemical Engineering: A Practical Guide ( Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co., KGaA , Morristown, USA , 2004 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
D. Montgomery , Design and Analysis of Experiments ( John Wiley and Sons , New York , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
N. Sanchez and M. Martinez, J. Aracil. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 36, 5 (1997). Web of Science, Google Scholar
G. Box and N. Draper , Empirical Model-Building and Response Surface ( John Wiley and Sons , New York , 1987 ) . Google Scholar
M. Amiri, A. Najafi and K. Gheshlaghi, J. Appl. Sci. 8, 15 (2008). Google Scholar
H. Mazaheriet al., Bioresource Technol. 10, 23 (2010). Google Scholar
K. T. Tan, K. T. Lee and A. R. Mohamed, Bioresource Technol. 101, 3 (2010). Google Scholar
Y. Ikada and H. Tsuji, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 21, 3 (2000). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. C. Thomsonet al., Adv. Polym. Sci. 122, 218 (1995). Google Scholar
V. Zacchiet al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 40, 2 (1998). Google Scholar
S. L. Ishauet al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 36, 1 (1997). Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. J. Li and R. S. Tuan, Polymeric scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering, Macromolecular Symp. (2005) p. 65. Google Scholar
H. Adeliet al., Curr. Nanosci. 7, 3 (2011), DOI: 10.2174/157341311795542552. Google Scholar
N. Aslan, Powder Technology 185, 1 (2008), DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.10.002. Web of Science, Google Scholar
I. Istadi and N. A. S. Amin, Fuel Processing Technol. 87, 449 (2006). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Fermosoet al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 1191 (2009), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.046. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Ahmadiet al., J. Hazard Mater. 123, 1 (2005), DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.042. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar