Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

On propagation behavior of shear wave in piezoelectric-sandwiched structure

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010135X24400071Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

    Abstract

    This paper delves into the analysis of shear wave propagation with a sandwiched structure comprising a piezoelectric layer and an elastic layer, with a transversely isotropic layer in between. The frequency equation has been derived following Biot’s theory. The dimensionless phase velocities numerical values are computed and visually depicted to demonstrate their dependencies on anisotropy, piezoelectricity, initial stress and porosity in a comparative manner. The explicit demonstration of the relationship between each parameter and the geometry has been presented. The observation shows that as porosity in the medium increases, the phase velocity also increases. Furthermore, the existence of medium anisotropy results in a decrease in the phase velocity of shear waves. Moreover, a correlation is observed where higher tensile initial stress within the medium leads to a corresponding reduction in the phase velocity of shear waves. We conclude that considered parameters (viz. piezoelectricity, anisotropy, porosity, initial stress and thickness of layers) affect the velocity profile of the shear waves significantly. This study holds practical significance in the development of innovative-layered composites, surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices and sensors utilizing intelligent piezoelectric devices for engineering purposes.

    1. Introduction

    In the past decade, researchers have shown significant interest in the exploration of wave propagation through piezoelectric-layered structures. This heightened attention is attributed to the intriguing applications of such studies in the manufacturing of seismic devices. Piezoelectric materials exhibit a crucial characteristic: a robust correlation between their electric and mechanical behavior. This inherent coupling renders these materials highly valuable in various scientific and technological applications, including displacement transducers, micro-positioners and sensors. Conventional homogeneous piezoelectric materials have some intrinsic defects in cases when load is applied or in terms of lack of stability. To overcome these defects, researchers have introduced the concepts of layered piezoelectric structure, functionally graded piezoelectric materials (FGPM), etc. These advanced piezoelectric structures have improved, durability properties in terms of resistance to deformation, durability and avoidance to stress concentration. To address these limitations, porosity is incorporated into piezoelectric materials, resulting in a reduction of material density and making them well suited for the mentioned applications. This novel category of materials is referred to as porous piezoelectric materials, exhibiting unique properties not achievable by their traditional, dense counterparts. Numerous researchers have explored porous piezoelectric ceramics in previous studies. In his research work, Dunn and Taya1 utilized a theoretical approach to anticipate the electro-mechanical characteristics of these ceramics. Various scholars examined the characteristics of porous piezoelectric ceramics through experimental approaches.2,3,4 Subsequently, Vashishth and Gupta5 formulated the fundamental constitutive equations and equations of motion for anisotropic porous piezoelectric materials employing a variational principle. In their study, Vashishth and Dahiya6 explored the transmission characteristics of SH-type waves within a periodically layered composite structure. This composite structure comprised alternating polymeric layers and porous piezoelectric layers. Additionally, Vashishth et al.7 employed the transfer matrix method to examine the propagation of BG-type waves in a layered structure composed of piezoceramic layers, featuring multiple layers and interfacing with a half-space of porous piezoelectric media (PPM). In their study, Sahu and colleagues8 examined the transference of Love-type waves within a three-layered structure. This structure consisted of an FGPM layer sandwiched between a piezoelectric layer and a piezomagnetic half-space, all with perfect interfaces. Also, Jiao et al.9 studied wave propagation in nonhomogeneous sandwiched structures between piezoelectric and piezomagnetic half-spaces to find the energy reflection and transmission coefficients of various waves. In his paper, Sahu et al.10 studied the propagation of shear horizontal (SH) surface waves in a composite structure in which an FGP plate fused with a porous piezoelectric plate to study properties for efficient surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices. Kumar et al.11 employed the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin asymptotic approach to examine the propagation of horizontally polarized shear (SH) waves in a piezoelectric composite structure. Studies have been also done to study surface wave propagation in piezo-poroelastic structures. In his research work, Sharma12 studied the propagation of surface waves along all directions on the plane boundary of piezo-poroelastic half-space with arbitrary anisotropy. Many studies have been undertaken about the propagation of Love and shear wave in layered piezoelectric composite structure to discuss the propagation behavior in the medium in terms of porosity and wave number on mechanical displacement, electrical displacement and stress.13,14,15

    Monitoring recent progress and cutting-edge research in the field of sensors and waveguides exposes a discernible gap, prompting an exploration of wave propagation phenomena in layered piezoelectric structures. Incorporating a controlled porosity serves to uphold the acoustic impedance balance between the medium and its surroundings, ultimately resulting in heightened sensitivity of the device. Consequently, investigating wave propagation in layered piezoelectric structures can provide valuable insights into optimizing the implementation of sandwiched structures in diverse sensors and actuators for increased efficiency and thereby enhancing the sensitivity of the device.

    The objective of the work is to study the shear wave propagation in a layered piezo-porous structure. The mathematical model is solved analytically to investigate the propagation behavior of shear waves under assumed constraints. The frequency equation has been derived using Biot’s theory of poroelasticity and numerical examples are presented to show the features of dispersion curves for different values of piezoelectricity, anisotropy, porosity, tensile initial stress and thickness of the layer.

    2. Statement and Formulation of the Problem

    The piezoelectric-layered structure is shown in Fig. 1. The focus of our study is on the transmission of transverse shear waves within layer of transversely isotropic porous material, characterized by its thickness h1 constrained between a piezoelectric layer of thickness h3 and an elastic layer under tensile initial stress of thickness h2, as in shown in Fig. 1. The arrange framework Oxyz is taken such that the z-axis indicating vertically descending. The x-direction is aligned with the propagation direction of the wave.

    Fig. 1.

    Fig. 1. Geometry of the problem.

    2.1. Constitutive equations

    Field equations for the piezoelectric layer can be expressed as16

    σij,j=ρ1¨ui,Di,j=0,(1)
    where i,j=1,2,3, ρ1 denotes mass density, Di and ui denote displacements in the ith-axis direction both electrical and mechanical in nature, respectively, σij is the stress. We have followed the Voigt summation convention with respect to time and space coordinates.

    The expression of the piezoelectric constitutive equation is as follows :

    σij=SklcijklEkekij,Dj=Sklejkl+Ekεjk,(2)
    where σij and Skl are the stress and strain tensor, Dj and Ek are the electrical displacement and electric field intensity and cijkl, ekij, εjk are the elastic, piezoelectric and dielectric (tensor notations) coefficients, respectively. Mechanical displacement and the strain components of the medium are related as
    Sij=12(ui,j+uj,i).(3)
    As per the quasi-static Maxwell’s equation, there exists a connection between the electric field intensity and the electric potential ϕ as
    Ei=ϕxi.(4)
    The constitutive equations (2) for a transversely isotropic piezoelectric medium with z-axis to be the axis of symmetry17 can be written as
    σx=Sxc11+Syc12+Szc13Eze31,σy=Sxc12+Syc11+Szc13Eze31,σz=Sxc13+Syc13+Szc33Eze33,σxy=(c11c12)Sxy2,σyz=c44Syze15Ex,σxz=c44Sxze15Ex,Dx=e15Syzε11Ex,Dy=e15Sxzε11Ey,Dz=e31Sx+e31Sz+e33Syε33Ez.(5)
    where σx=σ11, σy=σ22, σz=σ33, σxy=σ12, σyz=σ23, σxz=σ13.

    Biot18,19,20 formulated the constitutive equations governing the transversely isotropic porous layer by expressing them in relation to the displacement components of the bulk material ui and pore fluid displacements Ui (i=x,y,z)

    σx=(2N2+A2)Sx+A2Sy+F2Sz+M2V,σy=A2Sx+(2N2+A2)Sy+F2Sz+M2V,σz=F2Sx+F2Sy+2C2Sz+Q2V,σxy=σyx=2N2Sxy,σxz=σzx=2G2Sxz,σyz=σzy=2G2Syz,σ2=P2V+M2Sx+M2Sy+Q2Sz.(6)
    The above equation involves the stress tensor (σij), fluid volumetric strain (V=Ui), stress acting on the fluid phase σ2(=fp2), fluid pressure p2 and porosity f of the porous layer. The material constants A2, C2, F2, G2, M2, N2, Q2 and P2 are also part of this equation.

    The equation that govern shear wave propagation in homogeneous layer with uniform properties in all direction subjected to tensile initial stress is as follows :

    μ3(2uix2+2uiz2)P322uix2=ρ32uit2,(7)
    where i=1,2,3, P3 is the tensile initial stress along the x-direction, μ3 and ρ3 is the shear modulus and density of the elastic layer.

    The displacement component and the electric potential for each layer are

    For piezoelectric layer:u1x=u1z=0,u1y=u1y(x,z,t),ϕ=ϕ(x,z,t),For poroelastic layer:ux=uz=0,uy=uy(x,z,t),Ux=Uz=0,Uy=Uy(x,z,t),For elastic layer:u2x=u2z=0,u2y=u2y(x,z,t).(8)
    Substituting Eqs. (8) into Eqs. (4) and (5) and following Eq. (2), the governing equation for the piezoelectric medium can be written as
    c44(2u1yx2+2u1yz2)+e15(2ϕx2+2ϕz2)=ρ12u1yt2,e15(2u1yx2+2u1yz2)ε11(2ϕx2+2ϕz2)=0.(9)
    Upon replacing Eq. (6) into equations governing the porous layer without considering body forces and fluid viscosity, following Biot’s work,18,19,20 we arrive at the following result :
    (A2e+M2E),x+[N2(ux,x+uy,y)+(G2+F2A)uz,z],x+[N2(ux,xx+ux,yy)+G2ux,zz]=2t2[ρ11ux+ρ12Ux],(A2e+M2E),y+[N2(ux,x+uy,y)+(G2+F2A2)uz,z],y+[N2(uy,xx+uy,yy)+G2ux,zz]=2t2[ρ11uy+ρ12Uy],G2E,z+[(G2+F2)(ux,x+uy,y)+C2uz,z],z+[G2(uz,xx+uz,yy)+C2uz,zz]=2t2[ρ11uz+ρ12Uz],(M2E+P2e),x+(Q2M2)uz,zx=2t2[ρ11ux+ρ22Ux],(M2E+P2e),y+(Q2M2)uz,zy=2t2[ρ11uy+ρ22Uy],(M2E+P2e),z+(Q2M2)uz,zz=2t2[ρ11uz+ρ22Uz].(10)
    The total mass of the fluid–solid aggregate is
    ρ=ρ11+2ρ12+ρ22=ρs+f(ρfρs).
    Also, the dynamic coefficients, moreover, obey the inequalities
    ρ11>0,ρ120,ρ22>0,ρ11ρ22ρ212>0.
    Using the Love wave conditions (8), Eqs. (7) and (10) reduced to
    μ3(2u2yx2+2u2yz2)P322u2yx2=ρ32u2yt2,(11)
    and
    N22uyx2+G22uyz2=2t2[ρ11uy+ρ12Uy],2t2[ρ12uy+ρ22Uy]=0.(12)
    Solving Eq. (12), we obtain
    N22uyx2+G22uyz2=m2uyt2,(13)
    where m=ρ11ρ212ρ22.

    The piezoelectric layer’s upper surface is exposed to air. As air dielectric constant is significantly lower than piezoelectric material, we consider air to be vacuum for practical purposes. Consequently, the electric potential function ϕ0 can be determined using the Laplacian equation

    2ϕ0x2+2ϕ0z2=0.(14)

    2.2. Boundary conditions

    The boundary conditions can be described as follows.

    The state of being electrically and mechanically open at the free surface can be expressed as follows :

    τ1yz(h1h3,x)=0,ϕ(h1h3,x)=ϕ0(h1h3,x),D1z(h1h3,x)=D0(h1h3,x).(15)
    The expression for the conditions of being mechanically and electrically short at the free surface is as follows :
    τ1yz(h1h3,x)=0,ϕ(h1h3,x)=0.(16)
    The stress, mechanical displacement, stress, electrical displacement and electrical potential exhibit continuity at the interfaces connecting the piezoelectric layer with the poroelastic medium and with the poroelastic medium to elastic bottom layer as
    ϕ(h1,y)=0,u1y(h1,y)=uy(h1,y),τ1yz(h1,y)=τyz(h1,y),uy(0,y)=u2y(0,y),τyz(0,y)=τ2yz(0,y),τ2yz(h2,y)=0.(17)

    2.3. Solution of the problem

    From Eq. (14) and considering the boundary condition z, ϕ00, one can easily obtain the solution of the electrical potential function in vacuum as

    ϕ0(x,z,t)=c0ekzexp[ik(xct)].(18)
    The solution of Eq. (13) can be assumed as
    uy=V(z)ei(kxwt),(19)
    where k is the wave number, ω is the angular frequency and c is the common wave velocity.

    By substituting Eq. (19) into Eq. (13), we obtain

    d2V(z)dz2+N2G2(c2β21)k2V(z)=0,
    or
    d2V(z)dz2+a21k2V(z)=0,(20)
    where a21=γd(c2β21d), γ=N2G2 and β=N2m is the velocity of shear wave in porous layer. The shear wave velocity β can be also written as β=βa1d, where d=η11η212η22 and β=N2ρ is the shear wave velocity in the x-direction for a anisotropic nonporous elastic medium and the dimensionless parameters for the poroelastic layer are given by η11=ρ11p, η12=ρ12p and η22=ρ22p.

    Therefore, the solution for the displacement component uy is

    uy={c5cos(ka1z)+c6sin(ka1z)}ei(kxwt).(21)

    To write Eq. (9) explicitly in u1y and ϕ, we assume

    ψ=ϕe15ε11u1y,(22)
    which reduces Eq. (9) to
    2u1yx2+2u1yz2=1c2sh2u1yt2,(23)
    2ψx2+2ψz2=0,(24)
    where c2sh=1ρ1(c44+e215ε11).

    The wave propagation solution for uny(n=1,2) and ψ in x-direction can be formulated as

    uny=Vn(z)ei(kxwt)andψ=ξ(z)ei(kxwt).(25)

    Substituting Eq. (25) in Eqs. (23), (24) and (11), we obtain

    d2V1dz2+k2b21V1=0,d2ξdz2+k2ξ=0,d2V2dz2+k2b22V2=0.(26)
    Using Eqs. (26), solution for u1y, φ and u2y from can be written as
    u1y={c1cos(kb1z)+c2sin(kb1z)}ei(kxwt),(27)
    ϕ={e15ε11[c1cos(kb1z)+c2sin(kb1z)]+c3ekz+c4ekz}ei(kxwt),(28)
    u2y={c7cos(kb2z)+c8sin(kb2z)}ei(kxwt),(29)
    where b1=c2c2sh1, b2=P32μ3+c2β231 and β3=μ3ρ3 are velocities of shear wave in the elastic layer with tensile initial stress.

    3. Shear Wave Propagation and Dispersion Relation

    By utilizing the boundary conditions in Eq. (15) and continuity conditions described in Eq. (17) concerning the electrically open scenario, we derived a collection of homogeneous algebraic equations aimed at finding the unknown constants ci (i=08).

    In the electrically open case scenario, we can derive the algebraic equation for the unknown constants cii=0–8 by substituting the solution for uiy (i=1, 2), uy and ϕ and the boundary conditions mentioned in Eqs. (15) and (17). This results in the following set of algebraic equations :

    |Copij|9×9=0,i,j=08,(30)
    which represent the frequency equation for Love wave. For c>csh (csh denotes velocity of shear waves in upper layer), we have
    Cop11=c44b1sinkb1(h1+h3)+ie215ε11b1sinkb1(h1+h3),Cop12=c44b1coskb1(h1+h3)ie215ε11b1coskb1(h1+h3)Cop13=iek(h1+h3),Cop14=iek(h1+h3),Cop20=ek(h1+h3),Cop21=e215ε11coskb1(h1+h3),Cop22=e215ε11sinkb1(h1+h3),Cop23=ek(h1+h3),Cop24=ek(h1+h3),Cop30=ε0ek(h1+h3),Cop31=e15ε11ε33b1sinkb1(h1+h3),Cop32=e15ε11ε33b1coskb1(h1+h3),Cop33=ε33ek(h1+h3),Cop34=ε33ek(h1+h3),Cop41=e15ε11coskb1(h1),Cop42=e15ε11sinkb1(h1),Cop43=ek(h1),Cop44=ek(h1),Cop51=c44b1sinkb1(h1)e215ε11b1sinkb1(h1),Cop52=c44b1coskb1(h1)e215ε11b1coskb1(h1),Cop53=ekh1,Cop54=ekh1,Cop55=Gb2sinkb2(h1),Cop56=Gb2coskb2(h1),Cop61=coskb1(h1),Cop61=sinkb1(h1),Cop65=coskb2(h1),Cop66=sinkb2(h1),Cop75=1,Cop77=1,Cop86=Gb2,Cop88=cm44b2,Cop97=sin(kb2h2),Cop98=cos(kb2h2).
    All others term of Eq. (30) are equal to zero.

    In the electrically short case scenario, we can derive the algebraic equation for the unknown constants cij = 1–8 (c0 are additional constant) by substituting the solution for uiy (i=1, 2), uy and ϕ and the boundary conditions mentioned in Eqs. (15) and (17). This results in the following set of algebraic equations :

    |Copij|8×8=0,i,j=18.(31)
    Equation (31) represents the dispersion relation connecting the wave number and phase velocity in the scenarios of electrical open and electrical short cases can be derived from Eqs. (30) and (31).

    4. Numerical Data

    The propagation characteristics of shear wave based on dispersion relation in Eqs. (30) and (31) are investigated numerically with various selected elastic parameters to demonstrate the dispersion characteristics of the shear wave with (k1=h2h1), (k2=h3h1), dimensionless tensile stress α=P32μ3 and c44G=3.0, c44G=2.0.

    The material constants of the piezoelectric upper layer (PZT-4)21 are listed in Table 1.

    Table 1. Material properties used in numerical calculations.

    Properties materialElastic constant c44 (N/m2)Piezoelectric constant e15 (C/m2)Dielectric constant ε11 (F/m)Dielectric constant vacuum ε0 (F/m)Density ρ (kg/m3)
    PZT-4c44=25.6×109e15=12.7ε11=6.45×1098.85×10127.5×103

    4.1. Discussion: Dispersion curves in electrical open case

    In order to provide comparison of the dispersion characteristics, Figs. 2 and 3 discuss the dimensionless phase velocity against dimensionless wave number at different thickness ratio of the sandwiched poroelastic layer to the upper piezoelectric layer and, to the lower elastic layer of the medium in electrical open case. The curves show that the propagation of shear wave is influenced by thickness ratio k1 for different values of k2. Also, it is evident that when the fixed anisotropy and porosity are held constant, an increase in thickness ratio k1 or k2 results in a decrease in the phase velocity of the shear waves.

    Fig. 2.

    Fig. 2. Phase velocity for different k2 in the electrically open case when γ=1.0 and d=1.0 (a) k1=10.0; (b) k1=1.0.

    Fig. 3.

    Fig. 3. Phase velocity for different k2 in the electrically open case when γ=1.0 and d=0.6 (a) k1=10.0; (b) k1=1.0.

    Figure 4 has been plotted for dimensionless phase velocity against dimensionless wave number to discuss the effect of porosity of the medium for different values of thickness ratio k1 and k2. It clearly appears that as the porosity increases (i.e., as the value of d decreases) for fixed anisotropy, the phase velocity of shear waves increases.

    Fig. 4.

    Fig. 4. Phase velocity for different d in the electrically open case when e15=12.7, α=4, k1=1.0 and γ=5.0 (a) k2=10.0; (b) k2=1.0.

    Figure 5 shows the dispersion curves showing variation of phase velocity against dimensionless wave number for different values of piezoelectricity with different values of thickness ratio parameter k1 and k2. It can be seen that for fixed anisotropy and porosity and with varying thickness of layers disfavors the phase velocity of shear wave. However, when the thickness of each layers is same piezoelectricity favors phase velocity so that the phase velocity increases with the increase of piezoelectricity.

    Fig. 5.

    Fig. 5. Phase velocity for different e15 in the electrically open case when d=0.6, γ=3.0, α=4, k1=1.0 (a) k2=10.0; (b) k2=1.0.

    Anisotropy of sandwiched structure has a significant effect on the dispersion characteristics of shear wave in electrically open case. Figure 6 shows how anisotropy of a medium going to effect the phase velocity of shear waves with different values of thickness ratio k1 and k2 in the layered structure. It can be seen that for fixed value of porosity, the anisotropy of the medium decreases the phase velocity.

    Fig. 6.

    Fig. 6. Phase velocity for different γ in the electrically open case when d=0.6,e15=12.7, α=4, k1=1.0 (a) k2=10.0; (b) k2=1.0.

    Figure 7 illustrates the impact of tensile initial stress on the medium. It is evident that, with a constant anisotropy and porosity, the phase velocity of the medium decreases as the tensile initial stress increases. It is also evident that when the thickness of all layers is same, Phase velocity is different for lower wave number and converges for higher wave number.

    Fig. 7.

    Fig. 7. Phase velocity for different α in the electrically open case when d=0.6, e15=12.7, γ=2.0 and k1=1.0 (a) k2=10.0; (b) k2=1.0.

    4.2. Dispersion curves in electrical short case

    Figures 8 and 9 show the variation of phase velocity for the effect of porosity and anisotropy. As the porosity increases while keeping the anisotropy fixed, the phase velocity of shear waves also increases. On the other hand, when the anisotropy of the poroelastic layer increases, the phase velocity of shear waves decreases. Nonetheless, with an increase in wave number, all the curves converge.

    Fig. 8.

    Fig. 8. Phase velocity for different d in the electrically short case when α=2, e15=12.7, γ=1.0 and k1=1.0 (a) k2=10.0; (b) k2=1.0.

    Fig. 9.

    Fig. 9. Phase velocity for different γ in the electrically short case when e15=12.7, k2=10.0, k1=1.0 and α=2 (a) d=1.0; (b) d=0.6.

    For electrically short case, Fig. 10 shows the dispersion curves showing the variation of phase velocity against dimensionless wave number for different values of piezoelectricity with different values of thickness ratio parameter k1 and k2. It can be seen that for fixed anisotropy and porosity and with varying thickness of layers, piezoelectricity of the medium favors the phase velocity of shear wave.

    Fig. 10.

    Fig. 10. Phase velocity for different e15 in the electrically short case when d=0.6, k1=1.0 and α=2 (a) k2=10.0; (b) k2=1.0.

    5. Conclusions

    Large number of studied have been done to highlight the utility of piezoelectric material in umber of application. Also, Wave propagation in piezoelectric media have been studied in connection with the generation and transmission of disturbances in electro-acoustic devices such as SAW devices, resonators and transducers. The study of coupling between electrical, mechanical and piezoelectric effects of piezoelectric-porous system can done using the piezoelectric effects in piezoelectric-porous ceramics. So, the study of propagation of SH-waves considered here is very important. The velocity profile of SH-waves is analyzed using an analytical approach, taking into account the impact of anisotropy, porosity, piezoelectricity and initial stress. The study also examines the influence of geometry on each of these parameters, demonstrating the results explicitly. Frequency equations of the wave propagation has been derived, MATLAB and MATHEMATICA have been used for graphical interpretation in both electrical open and short case. We may conclude with the following results:

    (1)

    Dimensionless phase velocity increases with the decrease of dimensionless wave number in both electrical open and short case. Also, phase velocity varies for different values of thickness ratio of the layers.

    (2)

    As the wavelength of SH waves is smaller than the thickness of piezoelectric layer at higher wave number, the piezoelectric layer dominates the dispersion of the SH wave propagation.

    (3)

    It is observed that the porosity of the medium tends to increase the phase velocity of the shear waves in electrical open and short case.

    (4)

    Increment in anisotropy and tensile initial stress of the medium decreases the phase velocity of shear waves for different thickness ratio in both electrical open and short cases.

    (5)

    It is observed that when the thickness of the piezoelectric layer is greater in comparison to other layers, the phase velocity of shear waves decreases with the increase of piezoelectric parameter.

    (6)

    It is also observed when the thickness of all the layers is same, phase velocity of shear waves increases with the increases of piezoelectric parameters.

    Obtained results give a theoretical guidance for shear wave propagation in piezo-porous-layered structure and can be used for studies aimed to improving the designs of SAW devices used in signal processing and communication. The research holds the potential to aid in the creation of enhanced sensor and acoustic devices. This can be achieved by carefully choosing suitable materials, elastic constants, thicknesses and different boundary conditions.

    ORCID

    Pradeep Kumar Saroj   https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-7582