World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Spring Sale: Get 35% off with a min. purchase of 2 titles. Use code SPRING35. Valid till 31st Mar 2025.

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811268090_0007Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)
Abstract:

Despite the extensive existing studies on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, many of them are insufficient in explaining the financial implications of ESG activities of firms. Moreover, there is inconsistency in the relationship between ESG and firms’ financial performance. Some argue that ESG has a negative impact on a firm’s financial performance, while others argue the opposite. To fill the gap in the literature, we identify the root causes of this inconsistency in the existing studies and highlight the significance of the strategic approach in conducting ESG activities that will lead to coevolutionary results between firms and society/environment. In this respect, we suggest an analytical framework of ESG strategies by extending Porter and Kramer’s (2011) strategies for creating shared values (CSV). Moreover, by studying the case of Walmart’s ESG engagement and discovery of value creation opportunities from ESG activities, we identify the importance of an effective and win-win approach from the sustainability perspective. The four ESG strategies help firms transform the view on ESG activities from a cost burden to opportunities for higher value creation.