World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Spring Sale: Get 35% off with a min. purchase of 2 titles. Use code SPRING35. Valid till 31st Mar 2025.

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Chapter 8: Small Business and Liquidity Constraint

      https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813231252_0008Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
      Abstract:

      Small businesses differ from bigger businesses in important ways. One of the “stylized facts” mentioned in Chapter 2 is that “efficient markets” hypothesis does not seem to apply to small businesses. On the other hand, it is often said that small businesses sometimes cannot get access to capital funds even though their business plans could be profitable. Some research on small business has observed that small closely-held businesses often have definite preferences as to how they might raise capital. This is called the “Pecking Order Hypothesis” (e.g. Koropp et al., 2012). The Pecking Order Hypothesis is that a closely held firm will predictably prefer internal finance to borrowing but prefer borrowing to share issues that would dilute the close control. Thus, where internal finance is insufficient, borrowing may play a strategic role, and limits to the firm’s access to loan capital may be a particular strategic handicap…