World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Spring Sale: Get 35% off with a min. purchase of 2 titles. Use code SPRING35. Valid till 31st Mar 2025.

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Chapter 9: The Life Cycle of Small Business, Part 2: Succession

      https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813231252_0009Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
      Abstract:

      In a previous chapter, we discussed the founding of small businesses, but now we turn to a later stage in the life cycle. The typical small business relies on a single individual for the entrepreneurial input — management and initiative — or at most on a compact group. The entrepreneur will often be the proprietor or owner of a significant proportion of the firm. A key manager may also be an important owner. In a family business, the chief or key manager is likely to be a family member. What happens when the chief or a key manager does not continue — due to retirement, ill health or death? This is the succession problem, and it has two aspects. First, a retiring proprietor, or his heirs, will often want to take their capital out of the business: as a retirement fund, for example. This may create a problem in that the transition to new ownership will have to be financed. If small businesses have limited access to capital, this may present a particular obstacle. Second, it will be necessary to choose a new chief manager. If the business is a family business, the new chief may be chosen from among the departing chief’s relatives. Even if the business has not been run as a family business, the heirs of the proprietor will have a particular interest in the choice of the new chief manager. In fact, it is common the world around for the chief manager of a family-owned firm to be a member of the owner family. But why so? Wouldn’t the owners be better off to appoint the best manager available, regardless whether she is a family member or not? If not, why not? Those topics will be taken in reverse order.