Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Consistency of nonlinear interacting ghost dark energy with recent observations

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271817501243Cited by:9 (Source: Crossref)

    In this paper, we investigate ghost dark energy model in the presence of nonlinear interaction between dark energy and dark matter. We also extend the analysis to the so-called generalized ghost dark energy (GGDE) which ρD=αH+βH2. The model contains three free parameters as ΩD,ζ(=8πGβ3) and b2 (the coupling coefficient of interactions). We propose three kinds of nonlinear interaction terms and discuss the behavior of equation of state, deceleration and dark energy density parameters of the model. We also find the squared sound speed and search for signs of stability of the model. To compare the interacting GGDE model with observational data sets, we use more recent observational outcomes, namely SNIa from JLA catalog, Hubble parameter, baryonic acoustic oscillation and the most relevant CMB parameters including, the position of acoustic peaks, shift parameters and redshift to recombination. For GGDE with the first nonlinear interaction, the joint analysis indicates that ΩD=0.7192±0.0062, b2=0.146+0.0300.026 and ζ=0.104±0.047 at 1 optimal variance error. For the second interaction, the best fit values at 1σ confidence are ΩD=0.72091±0.0065, b2=0.0395±0.0080 and ζ0.0173. According to combination of all observational data sets considered in this paper, the best fit values for third nonlinearly interacting model are ΩD=0.7287±0.0062, b2=0.0109±0.0023 and ζ0.00764 at 1σ confidence interval. Finally, we found that the presence of interaction is compatible in mentioned models via current observational datasets.

    PACS: 95.36.+x, 98.80.Es
    You currently do not have access to the full text article.

    Recommend the journal to your library today!