Research PapersNo Access

An interacting new holographic dark energy model: Observational constraints

Department of Physics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

and

CAS Key Laboratory for Research in Galaxies and Cosmology, Department of Astronomy, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, P. R. China

School of Astronomy and Space Science University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, P. R. China

Institut de Ciencies de lEspai (CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain

International Laboratory for Theoretical Cosmology, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia

Research Division, Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 634061 Tomsk, Russia

E-mail Address: khurshudyan@yandex.com

E-mail Address: khurshudyan@ustc.edu.cn

E-mail Address: khurshudyan@tusur.ru

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819501529Cited by:17 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In this paper, we study an interacting new holographic dark energy model (NHDE) in DGP braneworld with a spatially flat FRW universe. Mainly, in this study we concentrate our attention on both interacting and noninteracting forms of the model. The study shows that the equation of state and the deceleration parameter depict an accelerated universe for all variety of interactions. On the other hand, the StateFinder analysis shows that the interacting and noninteracting behave similar to both quintessence and phantom dark energy and for the present value obey the behavior of quintessence. Moreover, the result of $O m$ $O m$ -diagnostic emphasizes on the result of the equation of state showing that the current model in high– $z$ $z$ stays in the quintessence era and in the late time has the Phantom-like behavior. By the use of the squared sound speed $v_{s}^{2}$ $v_{s}^{2}$ we find that the present mode has a good stability. In order to obtain the best fit values of the parameters in this work, we used the latest observational data (Pantheon, Boss DR12 and Planck 2015) implementing MCMC method by the use of EMCEE python package. We also employ AkaikeInformation Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) model selection tools and comparethe model with both $Λ$ $Λ$ CDM and holographic Ricci dark energy as the reference models. We observe that the evidence against the interacting and noninteracting NHDE with consideration of both references is strongly positive and BIC rules out the NHDE model. Generally, the results of AIC and BIC state that the observational data do not favor the NHDE model.

Keywords:

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. A. G. Riess et al., Architect. J. 116 (1998) 1009. Google Scholar
2. V. Sahni and A. A. Starobinsky, Int. J. Med. Phys. D 9 (2000) 373. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
3. P. James, E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 559. Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rep. 380 (2003) 235. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
5. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Med. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
6. J. A Frieman, M. S. Turner and D. Huterer, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46 (2008) 385. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
7. R. R. Caldwell and M. Kamionkowski, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59 (2009) 397. Google Scholar
8. M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wand, Commun. Theor. Phys. 56 (2011) 525. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
9. K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Astrophys. Space Sci. 342 (2012) 155. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
10. M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, Front. Phys. 8 (2013) 828. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
11. B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela and D. Pavon, Rep. Progress Phys. 79(5) (2016) 096901. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. D. Carturan and F. Finelli, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 103501. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
13. R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043527. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
14. S. Weinberg, Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe (Springer, 2001), pp. 18–26. Google Scholar
15. J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023517. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
16. V. Sahni, Class. Quant Grav. 19 (2002) 3435. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
17. J. Frieman, A. Joshua, M. S. Turner and D. Huterer, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46 (2008) 385. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
18. B. Wang, Y. Gong and E. Abdalla, Phys. Lett. B 624 (2005) 141. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
19. M. Ito, Europhys. Lett. 71 (2005) 712. ADS, Google Scholar
20. H. Wei and S. N. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 063003. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
21. M. Li, X. D. Li, Y. Wang and X. Zhang, J. Cosmol. Astropart Phys. 0912 (2009) 014. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
22. L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
23. A. Cohen, D. Kaplan and A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4971. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
24. M. Li, Phys. Lett B 603 (2004) 1. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
25. Q. G. Huang and M. Li, J. Cosmol. Astropart Phys. 0408 (2004) 013. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
26. R. Horvat, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 087301. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
27. G. Hooft, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026. Google Scholar
28. R. Bousso, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 825. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
29. S. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 081301. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
30. S. Dh hsu, Phys. Lett. B 594 (2004) 13. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
31. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063004. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
32. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 1285. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
33. M. R. Setare and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 331. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
34. M. R. Setare and E. N. Saridakis, J. Cosmol. Astropart Phys. 0903 (2009) 002. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
35. Y. F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare and J. Q. Xia, Phys. Rep. 493 (2010) 1. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
36. A. Jawad and A. Majeed, Astrophys. Space Sci. 356 (2015) 375. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
37. M. Khurshudyan, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361 (2016) 232. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
38. M. Khurshudyan, Symmetry 8 (2016) 110. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
39. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 023003. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
40. E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and P. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 103504. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
41. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 123509. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
42. A. Sheykhi, M. H. Dehghani and S. Ghaffari, Int. J. Med. Phys. D 25 (2016) 1650018. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
43. A. Sheykhi and B. Wang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25 (2010) 1199. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
44. R. Maartens and K. Koyama, Liv. Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 5. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
45. L. Amarilla and E. F. Eiroa, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 064019. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
46. A. Sheykhi, M. H. Dehghani and S. E Hosseini, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 23. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
47. G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
48. C. Deffayet, Phys. Lett. B 502 (2001) 199. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
49. C. Deffayet, G. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 044023. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
50. U. Alam, V. Sahni, T. Deep Saini and A. Starobinsky, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344 (2003) 1057. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
51. V. Sahni, T. D. Saini, A. A. Starobinsky and U. Alam, J. Exp. Theory. Phy. Lett. 77 (2003) 201. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
52. V. Sahni, A. Shafeloo and A. A. Starobinsky. Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 103502. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
53. J. Dutta and S. Chakraborty, Gen. Relat. Gravit. 42 (2010) 1863. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
54. D. J. Liu, H. Wang and B. Yang, Phys. Lett. B. 694 (2010) 6. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
55. H. Lin, C. Hao, X. Wang, Q. Yuan, Z. L. Yi, T. J. Zhang and B. Q. Wang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24 (2009) 1699. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
56. L. Lombriser, W. Hu, W. Fang and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 063536. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
57. K. Zhang, P. Wu and H. Yu, Phys. Lett. B 690 (2010) 229. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
58. S. Ghaffari, M. H. Dehghani and A. Sheykhi, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 123009. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
59. E. Sadri and B. Vakili, Astrophys. Space Sci. 363 (2018) 13. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
60. M. Khurshudyan and R. Myrzakulov, Euro. Phys. J. C., 77 (2017) 65. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
61. E. Sadri, M. Khurshudyan and D. F. Zeng, arXiv:1904.11600. Google Scholar
62. S. Perlmutter, S. Gabi, G. Goldhaber, A. Goobar, D. E. Groom, I. M. Hook, A. G. Kim, M. Y. Kim, J. C. Lee, R. Pain et al., Architect. J. 483 (1997) 565. Google Scholar
63. R. A. Daly et al., Architect. J. 677 (2008) 1. Google Scholar
64. A. Sheykhi and M. Sadegh Movahed, Gen. Rel. Grav. 44 (2012) 449. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
65. N. Suzuki et al., Architect. J. 746 (2012) 85. Google Scholar
66. V. Salvatelli, A. Marchini, L. Lopez-Honorez and O. Mena, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 023531. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
67. G. Hinshaw et al., Astrophys. J. Supplement Ser. 208 (2013) 19. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
68. C. Zhang et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys. 14 (2014) 1221. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
69. M. Moresco, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450 (2015) L16. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
70. M. Moresco et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys 2016 (2016) 014. Web of Science, Google Scholar
71. O. Farooq et al., Astrophys. J. 835 (2017) 26. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
72. J. F. Jesus, R. F. L Holanda and S. H. Pereira, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys, 2018 (2018) 73. Web of Science, Google Scholar
73. P. A. R. Ade et al., Astron. & Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
74. A. Ali, R. Gannouji, M. Sami and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D, 81 (2010) 104029. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
75. E. Ebrahimi and A. Sheykhi, Int. J. Med. Phys. D 20 (2011) 2369. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
76. E. Ebrahimi and A. Sheykhi, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 52 (2013) 2966. Web of Science, Google Scholar
77. A. Sayahian Jahromi et al., Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 21. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
78. K. Y. Kim, H. W. Lee and Y. S Myung, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 118. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
79. Y. S. Myung, Phys. Lett. B 652 (2007) 223. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
80. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman, Public. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 125 (2013) 306. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
81. D. M. Scolnic et al., Astrophys. J. 859 (2018) 101. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
82. F. Beutler et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416 (2011) 3017. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
83. M. Ata et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473 (2017) 4773. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
84. S. Alam et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470 (2017) 2617. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
85. W. Hu and N. Sugiyama, Architect. J. 471 (1996) 542. Google Scholar
86. Y. Wang and P. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 103533. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
87. H. Akaike, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (1974) 716. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
88. G. Schwarz, Ann. Stat., 6 (1978) 461. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
89. A. R. Liddle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 351 (2004) L49. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
90. M. Szydłowski, A. Kurek and A Krawiec, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 171. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
91. M. Biesiada, J. Cosmol. Astropart Phys. 0702 (2007) 003. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
92. M. Li, X. D. Li and X. X. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53 (2010) 1631. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar