World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

An Integral-Generalized Finite Difference Method for Interface Problems in Solid Mechanics

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825124500017Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

    Interface problems exist widely in various engineering problems and their high-precision simulation is of great importance. A new computational approach for dealing with interface problems is proposed based on the recently developed integral-generalized finite difference (IGFD) scheme. In this method, the research domain is divided into several subdomains by interfaces, and discretization schemes are established independently in each subdomain. A new cross-subdomain integration scheme is introduced to connect these subdomains. Several two-dimensional elasticity models containing material interfaces are studied to test the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the recently proposed approach without the help of discontinuous functions or auxiliary equations that are commonly used in other numerical methods (e.g., extended finite element method and boundary element method) enables obtaining high accuracy and efficiency in interface problems. The proposed method has great potential in the application of material interface problems in solid mechanics and, furthermore, weak discontinuity problems in various fields.

    References

    • Abdullah, M., Rahmayanti, H. D., Amalia, N., Yuliza, E. and Munir, R. [2021] “ Effective elastic modulus of wet granular materials derived from modified effective medium approximation and proposal of an equation for the friction coefficient between the object and wet granular materials surfaces,” Granular Matter 23, 78. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • An, X., Ma, G., Cai, Y. and Zhu, H. [2011] “ A new way to treat material discontinuities in the numerical manifold method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200(47–48), 3296–3308. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Bai, B., Ci, H., Lei, H. and Cui, Y. [2022] “ A local integral-generalized finite difference method with mesh-meshless duality and its application,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 139, 14–31. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Banh, T. T. and Lee, D. [2018] “ Multi-material topology optimization design for continuum structures with crack patterns,” Composite Structures 186, 193–209. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Chen, Q., Nezhad, M. M., Fisher, Q. and Zhu, H. H. [2016] “ Multiscale approach based predictions for shale rock’s transversely isotropic properties considering the multi-inclusion and ITZ effects,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 84, 95–104. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Fung, T. H., Veeken, T., Payne, D., Veettil, B., Polman, A. and Abbott, M. [2019] “ Application and validity of the effective medium approximation to the optical properties of nano-textured silicon coated with a dielectric layer,” Optics Express 27, 38645–38660. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Gavete, L., Benito, J. J. and Ureña, F. [2016] “ Generalized finite differences for solving 3D elliptic and parabolic equations,” Applied Mathematical Modelling 40, 955–965. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Habibian, A., Sohouli, A., Kefal, A., Nadler, B., Yildiz, M. and Suleman, A. [2021] “ Multi-material topology optimization of structures with discontinuities using Peridynamics,” Composite Structures 258, 113345. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Han, W., Wang, S., Liu, W., Sun, W., Hou, Q., Zhang, S. and Wei, W. [2022] “ Crack analysis using a hybrid numerical manifold method with node-based strain smoothing and double-interpolation,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 273, 108685. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • He, B., Javvaji, B. and Zhuang, X. [2019] “ Characterizing flexoelectricity in composite material using the element-free Galerkin method,” Energies 12, 271. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • He, D. and Ma, H. [2019] “ Efficient solution of 3D solids with large numbers of fluid-filled pores using eigenstrain BIEs with iteration procedure,” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences 118, 15–40. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Huang, Q., Qiang, H., Zhang, X. and Yao, Z. [2014] “ Boundary element method for problems with multiple types of inclusions,” Engineering Mechanics 31, 17–24. Google Scholar
    • Ji, H. and Zhang, Q. [2016] “ A simple finite element method for Stokes flows with surface tension using unfitted meshes,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 81, 87–103. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Jiang, S., Du, C. and Ooi, E. T. [2019] “ Modelling strong and weak discontinuities with the scaled boundary finite element method through enrichment,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 222, 106734. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Kamyabi, A., Kermani, V. and Kamyabi, M. [2019] “ Improvements to the meshless generalized finite difference method,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 99, 233–243. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Krowiak, A. and Filipowska, R. [2019] “ Kansa method for problems with weak discontinuity,” AIP Conference Proceedings, 2116, 450021. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Krysl, P. and Belytschko, T. [1997] “ Element-free Galerkin method: Convergence of the continuous and discontinuous shape functions,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 148, 257–277. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Kurumatani, M. and Terada, K. [2009] “ Finite cover method with multi-cover layers for the analysis of evolving discontinuities in heterogeneous media,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 79, 1–24. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Lin, J. and Yu, H. [2021] “ Simulation of antiplane shear problems with multiple inclusions using the generalized finite difference method,” Applied Mathematics Letters 121, 107431. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Ling, D., Yang, Q. and Cox, B. [2009] “ An augmented finite element method for modeling arbitrary discontinuities in composite materials,” International Journal of Fracture 156, 53–73. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Long, G. and Xu, G. [2016] “ A combined boundary integral method for analysis of crack problems in multilayered elastic media,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics 8, 1650070. Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Masud, A. and Al-Naseem, A. A. [2018] “ Variationally derived discontinuity capturing methods: Fine scale models with embedded weak and strong discontinuities,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 340, 1102–1134. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Mendonça, T. S., Peixoto, R. G. and Ribeiro, G. O. [2020] “ A new class of cells with embedded discontinuity for fracture analysis by the boundary element method,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 121, 3869–3892. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Moës, N., Cloirec, M., Cartraud, P. and Remacle, J. F. [2003] “ A computational approach to handle complex microstructure geometries,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 192, 3163–3177. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Organ, D., Fleming, M., Terry, T. and Belytschko, T. [1996] “ Continuous meshless approximations for nonconvex bodies by diffraction and transparency,” Computational Mechanics 18, 225–235. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Peixoto, R. G., Ribeiro, G. O. and Pitangueira, R. L. S. [2018] “ A boundary element method formulation for quasi-brittle material fracture analysis using the continuum strong discontinuity approach,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 202, 47–74. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Pennati, V. and Corti, S. [1994] “ Generalized finite-differences solution of 3D elliptical problems involving Neumann boundary conditions,” Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 10, 43–58. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Shuai, D., Wei, J., Di, B., Guo, J., Li, D., Gong, F. and Stovas, A. [2020] “ Experimental study of crack density influence on the accuracy of effective medium theory,” Geophysical Journal International 220, 352–369. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Song, Z., He, X., Li, W. and Xie, D. [2020] “ Development of matched interface and boundary method for buckling analysis of plates with various interfaces,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics 12, 2050086. Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Sukumar, N., Chopp, D. L., Moës, N. and Belytschko, T. [2001] “ Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190(46), 6183–6200. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Vandoren, B. and Proft, K. D. [2014] “ Mesoscopic modelling of masonry using GFEM: A comparison of strong and weak discontinuity models,” Blucher Mechanical Engineering Proceedings 1, 1–7. Google Scholar
    • Wan, D., Hu, D., Natarajan, S., Bordas, S. P. A. and Yang, G. [2017] “ A fully smoothed XFEM for analysis of axisymmetric problems with weak discontinuities,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 110, 203–226. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, L., Dresen, G., Rybacki, E., Bonnelye, A. and Bohnhoff, M. [2020] “ Pressure-dependent bulk compressibility of a porous granular material modeled by improved contact mechanics and micromechanical approaches: Effects of surface roughness of grains,” Acta Materialia 188, 259–272. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, Y., Gu, Y., Fan, C. M., Chen, W. and Zhang, C. [2018] “ Domain-decomposition generalized finite difference method for stress analysis in multi-layered elastic materials,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 94, 94–102. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, Y. and Luo, Z. [2011] “ A meshless level set method for shape and topology optimization,” Advanced Materials Research 308–310, 1046–1049. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, Y., Luo, Z., Kang, Z. and Zhang, N. [2015] “ A multi-material level set-based topology and shape optimization method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 283, 1570–1586. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, L., Rybacki, E., Bonnelye, A., Bohnhoff, M. and Dresen, G. [2021] “ Experimental investigation on static and dynamic bulk moduli of dry and fluid-saturated porous sandstones,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 54, 129–148. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, K., Tang, C., Li, G. and Lu, Z. [2022] “ Numerical simulation of dynamic fractures in 2D FGMs using the numerical manifold method,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 140, 32–47. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wang, B., Xiao, Y. and Li, Z. [2016] “ The p-version finite element method for modeling weak discontinuity problems,” Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics 37, 59–73. Google Scholar
    • Wang, C. and Zhang, S. [2023] “ A weak Galerkin method for elasticity interface problems,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 419, 127589. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Xing, Y., Song, L. and Fan, C. M. [2021] “ A generalized finite difference method for solving elasticity interface problems,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 128, 105–117. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Xing, Y., Song, L., He, X. and Qiu, C. [2020] “ A generalized finite difference method for solving elliptic interface problems,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 178, 109–124. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Xu, H. and Bao, Y. [2022] “ Generalized finite difference method for solving waveguide eigenvalue problems,” The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal 37, 266–272. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Yang D. [2021] “ Numerical modeling of laboratory-scale asteroid impact based on elastoplastic flow model and CESE method,” AIP Advance 11, 125024. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Yang, L., Yang, Y. and Zheng, H. [2021] “ A phase field numerical manifold method for crack propagation in quasi-brittle materials,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 241, 107427. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Zuo, W. and Saitou, K. [2017] “ Multi-material topology optimization using ordered SIMP interpolation,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 55, 477–491. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Check out these titles in Mechanical Engineering!