World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Development of calibration models for rapid determination of moisture content in rubber sheets using portable near-infrared spectrometers

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545820500091Cited by:10 (Source: Crossref)

    Rubber sheets are one of the primary products of natural rubber and are the main raw material in various rubber industries. The quality of a rubber sheet can be visually examined by holding it against clear light to inspect for any specks and impurities inside, but its moisture content is difficult to evaluate based on a visual inspection and this might lead to unfair trading. Herein, we developed a rapid, robust and nondestructive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-based method for moisture content determination in rubber sheets. A set of 300 rubber sheets were divided into a calibration (200 samples) and prediction groups (100 samples). The calibration set was used to develop NIRS calibration equation using different calibration models, Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR), Least Square Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Among the models investigated, the ANN model with the first derivative of spectral preprocessing presented the best prediction with a coefficient of determination (RP2) of 0.993, root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) of 0.126% and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.179%. The results indicated that the proposed NIRS-ANN model will be able to reduce human error and provide a highly accurate estimate of the moisture content in a rubber sheet compared to traditional wet chemistry estimation methods according to AOAC standards.

    References

    • 1. C. Pasquini, “Near infrared spectroscopy: A mature analytical technique with new perspectives,” J. Anal. Chim. 1026, 8–36 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 2. K. H. Norris, “Design and development of a new moisture meter,” J. Agric. Eng. 45(7), 370–372 (1964). Google Scholar
    • 3. A. M. Davies, A. Grant, “Review: Near-infra-red analysis of food,” J. Food Sci. Technol. 22, 191–207 (1987). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 4. R. Rittiron, W. Seehalak, “Moisture content in rubber sheet analyzed by transflectance near infrared spectroscopy,” J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 7, 1350068 (2014). Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 5. P. Sirisomboon, A. Kaewkuptong, P. Williams, “Feasibility study on the evaluation of the dry rubber content of field and concentrated latex of Para rubber by diffuse reflectance near infrared spectroscopy,” J. Near Infrared Spec. 21, 81–88 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 6. S. Suchata, P. Theanjumpolb, S. Karrila, “Rapid moisture determination for cup lump natural rubber by near infrared spectroscopy,” J. Ind Crop Prod. 76, 772–780 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 7. V. R. Sharabiani, A. S. Naza, “Prediction of protein content of winter wheat by canopy of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) using partial least squares regression (PLSR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models,” J. Agric. Sci. 29(1), 43–51 (2019). Google Scholar
    • 8. M. J. Martelo-Vidal, M. Vázquez, “Application of artificial neural networks coupled to UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy for the rapid quantification of wine compounds in aqueous mixtures,” J. Food Eng. 13(1), 32–39 (2015). Google Scholar
    • 9. A. Savitzky, M. J. Golay, “Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures,” J. Anal. Chem. 36(8), 1627–1639 (1964). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 10. N. M. Nawi, T. Jensen, G. Chen, “The application of spectroscopic methods to predict sugarcane quality based on stalk cross-sectional scanning,” J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 32, 16–27 (2012). Google Scholar
    • 11. S. Wold, J. Trygg, A. Berglund, H. Antti, “Some recent development in PLS modeling,” J. Chemometr. Intell. Lab Syst. 58, 131–150 (2001). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 12. X. Yu, H. Lu, D. Wu, “Development of deep learning method for predicting firmness and soluble solid content of postharvest Korla fragrant pear using Vis/NIR hyperspectral reflectance imaging,” J. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 141, 39–49 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 13. R. Redaellia, M. Alfieria, G. Cabassi, “Development of a NIRS calibration for total antioxidant capacity in maize germplasm,” Talanta 154, 164–168 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 14. J. Li, W. Huang, C. Zhao, B. Zhang, “A comparative study for the quantitative determination of soluble solids content, pH and firmness of pears by Vis/NIR spectroscopy,” J. Food Eng. 116(2), 324–332 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 15. V. N. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York (1998). Google Scholar
    • 16. H. Y. Yua, X. Y. Niua, H. J. Lina, Y. B. Yinga, B. B. Lib, X. X. Panc, “A feasibility study on on-line determination of rice wine composition by Vis-NIR spectroscopy and least-squares support vector machines,” J. Food Chem. 113(1), 291–296 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 17. A. Morellosa, X. E. Pantazia, D. Moshoua, T. Alexandridisc, R. Whettonb, G. Tziotziosa, J. Wiebensohnd, R. Billd, A. M. Mouazen, “Machine learning based prediction of soil total nitrogen, organic carbon and moisture content by using VIS-NIR spectroscopy,” J. Biosyst. Eng. 152, 104–116 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Z. Han, S. Cai, X. Zhang, Q. Qian, Y. Huang, F. Dai, G. Zhang, “Development of predictive models for total phenolics and free p-coumaric acid contents in barley grain by near-infrared spectroscopy,” J. Food Chem. 227, 342–348 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 19. J. A. Suykens, J. Vandewalle, “Least squares support vector machine classifiers,” Neural Process. Lett. 9(3), 293–300 (1999). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 20. F. Chauchard, R. Cogdillb, S. Rousselc, J. M. Rogera, V. Bellon-Maurela, “Application of LS-SVM to non-linear phenomena in NIR spectroscopy: Development of a robust and portable sensor for acidity prediction in grapes,” J. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 71(2), 141–150 (2004). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 21. K. De Brabanter, P. Karsmakers, F. Ojeda, C. Alzate, J. De Brabanter, K. Pelckmans, “LS-SVM toolbox user’s guide,” ESAT-SISTA Technical Report, 10-146, (2011). Google Scholar
    • 22. D. Kruzlicova, J. Mock, B. Balla, J. Petka, M. Farkova, J. Havel, “Classification of Slovak white wines using artificial neural networks and discriminant techniques,” J. Food Chem. 112, 1046–1052 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 23. S. Minaei, H. Bagherpour, M. A. Noghabi, M. E. Khorasani Fardvani, F. Forughimanesh, “A comparative study concerning linear and nonlinear models to determine sugar content in sugar beet by near infrared spectroscopy,” J. Food Biosci. Technol. 6(1), 13–22 (2016). Google Scholar
    • 24. Y. Zhai, J. A. Thomasson, J. E. Boggess, R. Sui, “Soil texture classification with artificial neural networks operating on remote sensing data,” J. Comput Electron Agr. 54, 53–68 (2006). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 25. M. T. Hagan, M. Menhaj, “Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5, 989–993 (1994). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 26. D. Pérez-Marín, A. Garrido-Varo, J. E. Guerrero, J. C. Gutiérrez-Estrada, “Use of artificial neural networks in near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy calibrations for predicting the inclusion percentages of wheat and sunflower meal in compound feeding stuffs,” J. Appl Spectrosc. 60(9), 1062–1069 (2006). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 27. R. Stone, “Improved statistical procedure for the evaluation of solar radiation estimation models,” Solar Energy 51(4), 289–291 (1993). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 28. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 21st edition, https://www.aoac.org/official-methods-of-analysis-21st-edition-2019/ (2019). Google Scholar
    • 29. G. Hans, B. Leblon, P. Cooper, A. L. Rocque, J. Nader, “Determination of moisture content and basic specific gravity of Populus tremuloides (Michx.) and Populus balsamifera (L.) logs using a portable near-infrared spectrometer,” J. Wood Mater Sci Eng. 10, 3–16 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 30. B. G. Osborne, T. Fearn, P. H. Hindle, Practical NIR Spectroscopy with Applications in Food and Beverage Analysis, Longman Group UK Limited, UK (1993). Google Scholar
    • 31. W. Saeys, A. M. Mouazen, H. Ramon, “Potential for onsite and online analysis of pig manure using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy,” J. Biosyst. Eng. 91(4), 393–402 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 32. M. Taurines, L. Brancheriau, S. Palu, D. Pioch, E. Tardan, N. Boutahar, P. Sartre, F. Meunier, “Determination of natural rubber and resin content of guayule fresh biomass by near infrared spectroscopy,” J. Ind Crops Prod. 134, 177–184 (2019). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar