World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

System Characterization and Adaptive Tracking Control of Quadrotors under Multiple Operating Conditions

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2737480721500060Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

    This paper presents an adaptive controller design framework with input compensation for quadrotor systems, which deals with different system operating conditions with a uniform update law for the controller parameters. The motivation of the work is to handle the situation that existing adaptive control schemes are either restricted to the system equilibrium as the hover condition or unable to deal with the diverse system uncertainties which cause system interactor matrix and high-frequency gain matrix to change. An adaptive control scheme equipped with an input compensator is constructed to make the system to have a uniform interactor matrix and a consistent pattern of the gain matrix signs over different operating conditions, which are key prior design conditions for model reference adaptive control applied to quadrotor systems. To deal with the uncertain system high-frequency gain matrix, a gain matrix decomposition technique is employed to parametrize an error system model in terms of the gain parameters and tracking errors, for the design of an adaptive parameter update law with reduced system knowledge. It is ensured that all closed-loop system signals are bounded, and the system output tracks a reference output asymptotically despite the system parameter uncertainties and the uncertain offsets at non-equilibrium operating conditions. The proposed scheme expands the capacity of adaptive control for quadrotors to operate at multiple operating conditions in the presence of system uncertainties. Simulation results of a quadrotor with the proposed adaptive control scheme are presented to show the desired system performance.

    References

    • 1. P. Martin, S. Devasia and B. Paden, A Different Look at Output Tracking: Control of a VTOL Aircraft, in Proc. 33rd IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 1994. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2. M. Saeki and Y. Sakaue, Flight Control Design for a Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase VTOL Aircraft via Two-step Linearization, in Proc. 40th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 2001. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 3. A. Tayebi and S. McGilvray, Attitude Stabilization of a VTOL Quadrotor Aircraft, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 14, 562 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 4. M. D. Hua, T. Hamel, P. Morin and C. Samson, Introduction to Feedback Control of Underactuated VTOL Vehicles: A Review of Basic Control Design Ideas and Principles, IEEE Control Syst. 33, 61 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 5. R. Amin, L. Aijun and S. Shamshirband, A Review of Quadrotor UAV: Control Methodologies and Performance Evaluation, Int. J. Autom. Control 10, 87 (2016). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6. L. Li, L. Sun and J. Jin, Survey of Advances in Control Algorithms of Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, in 2015 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Communication Technology (ICCT), 2015. Google Scholar
    • 7. F. Kendoul, Survey of Advances in Guidance, Navigation, and Control of Unmanned Rotorcraft Systems, J. Field Robot. 29, 315 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 8. A. S. Saeed, A. B. Younes, S. Islam, J. Dias, L. Seneviratne and G. Cai, A Review on the Platform Design, Dynamic Modeling and Control of Hybrid UAVs, in 2015 Int. Conf. Unmanned Aircraft Systems, 2015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 9. R. Rashad, J. B. Engelen and S. Stramigioli, Energy Tank-based Wrench/Impedance Control of a Fully-actuated Hexarotor: A Geometric Port-hamiltonian Approach, in 2019 Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, 2019. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 10. D. Lee, H. Jin Kim and S. Sastry, Feedback Linearization vs. Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for a Quadrotor Helicopter, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 7, 419 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 11. S. Bouabdallah, A. Noth and R. Siegwart, PID vs LQ Control Techniques Applied to an Indoor Micro Quadrotor, in 2004 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sept. 2004. Google Scholar
    • 12. Y. Wang, J. Sun, H. He and C. Sun, Deterministic Policy Gradient with Integral Compensator for Robust Quadrotor Control, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 50, 3713 (2019). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13. T. Dierks and S. Jagannathan, Output Feedback Control of a Quadrotor UAV Using Neural Networks, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 21, 50 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Z. Dydek, A. Annaswamy and E. Lavretsky, Adaptive Control of Quadrotor UAVs: A Design Trade Study with Flight Evaluations, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 21, 1400 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 15. A. Freddi, A. Lanzon and S. Longhi, A Feedback Linearization Approach to Fault Tolerance in Quadrotor Vehicles, in IFAC World Cong., Milano, Italy, 2011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Y. Kutsuna, M. Ando and M. Yamada, Adaptive Position Control of Quadrotor Helicopter in Quaternion based on Input–Output Linearization, in 2014 Int. Conf. Advanced Mechatronic Systems, August 2014. Google Scholar
    • 17. A. L. Salih, M. Moghavvemi, H. A. F. Mohamed and K. S. Gaeid, Modelling and PID Controller Design for a Quadrotor Unmanned Air Vehicle, in 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Automation Quality and Testing Robotics, May 2010. Google Scholar
    • 18. P. E. I. Pounds, D. R. Bersak and A. M. Dollar, Stability of Small-scale UAV Helicopters and Quadrotors with Added Payload Mass under PID Control, Auton. Robot. 33, 129 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 19. J. Li and Y. Li, Dynamic Analysis and PID Control for a Quadrotor, in 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics and Automation, Aug. 2011. Google Scholar
    • 20. B. Erginer and E. Altug, Modeling and PD Control of a Quadrotor VTOL Vehicle, in 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., June 2007. Google Scholar
    • 21. D. Gautam and C. Ha, Control of a Quadrotor using a Smart Self-tuning Fuzzy PID Controller, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 10 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 22. L. Abdou et al., Parameters Tuning of a Quadrotor PID Controllers by Using Nature-inspired Algorithms, Evol. Intell. 1 (2019). Google Scholar
    • 23. G. Tao, Adaptive Control Design and Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 24. P. A. Ioannou and J. Sun, Robust Adaptive Control (Courier Corporation, 2012). Google Scholar
    • 25. K. S. Narendra and A. M. Annaswamy, Stable Adaptive Systems (Courier Corporation, 2012). Google Scholar
    • 26. S. B. Roy, S. Bhasin and I. N. Kar, Combined MRAC for Unknown MIMO LTI Systems with Parameter Convergence, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 63, 283 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 27. T. Yucelen, E. Arabi and S. N. Balakrishnan, A Structural Condition for Model Reference Adaptive Control Systems to Enforce Partial Performance Constraints, in 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf., 2018. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 28. J. M. Selfridge and G. Tao, A Multivariable Adaptive Controller for a Quadrotor with Guaranteed Matching Conditions, Syst. Sci. & Control Eng. 2, 24 (2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 29. J. M. Selfridge and G. Tao, Multivariable Output Feedback MRAC for a Quadrotor UAV, in 2016 American Control Conf. (ACC), July 2016. Google Scholar
    • 30. Y. Sheng and G. Tao, Dynamics Mutation and Tracking Control of Quadrotors under Multiple Operating Conditions, Technical report (2017). Google Scholar
    • 31. R. Singh and K. Narendra, Prior Information in the Design of Multivariable Adaptive Controllers, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 29, 1108 (1984). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 32. T. Luukkonen, Modelling and Control of Quadcopter Independent Research Project in Applied Mathematics, Espoo, 2011. Google Scholar
    • 33. J. Guo, Y. Liu and G. Tao, Multivariable MRAC with State Feedback for Output Tracking, in American Control Conf., June 2009. Google Scholar
    • 34. J. Guo, G. Tao and Y. Liu, Multivariable Adaptive Control of NASA Generic Transport Aircraft Model with Damage, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 34, 1495 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar