World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

ANALYSIS OF CARDIOVASCULAR, CARDIORESPIRATORY, AND VASCULO-RESPIRATORY SIGNALS USING DIFFERENT MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES

    https://doi.org/10.4015/S1016237222500454Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

    Many physiological signals such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and respiration (RESP) affect each other, and the inter-relation within and between these signals can be linear or nonlinear. Therefore, this paper’s main aim is to extract the relevant features using the information domain coupling technique based on conditional transfer entropy to detect the nonlinearity and coupling changes between the physiological signals and to classify the database using various machine learning classifiers to study the aging changes in the contribution of HR, BP, and RESP. In the proposed work, the physiological signals, i.e. HR, BP, and RESP, were pre-processed using various filtering methods, then features of physiological signals were extracted using linear and nonlinear techniques. After the pre-processing and extraction of features, the extracted features are classified using machine learning classifiers to classify the physiological signal database to study the aging changes in the contribution of HR, BP, and RESP. The data has been taken from the standard Fantasia database of healthy young and old subjects and self-recorded data of healthy young and old subjects for this study. Naive Bayes (NB), Support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were trained using five-fold cross-validation on the physiological dataset. It is concluded from the results that by adding the coupling features, the efficiency of the final prediction of the classifier increased from 70% to 75% obtained by LR, 90% to 100% obtained by SVM, 95% to 100% obtained by KNN, 81.2% to 85% obtained by NB, and 95% to 100% obtained by ANN. The ANN performs well when provided with the coupling features, gives a maximum accuracy of 100% and very high sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%, and takes much less computational time, when compared to other machine learning algorithms on same length of database.