Processing math: 100%
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    Lattices of regular closed subsets of closure spaces

    For a closure space (P, φ) with φ(ø) = ø, the closures of open subsets of P, called the regular closed subsets, form an ortholattice Reg(P, φ), extending the poset Clop(P, φ) of all clopen subsets. If (P, φ) is a finite convex geometry, then Reg(P, φ) is pseudocomplemented. The Dedekind–MacNeille completion of the poset of regions of any central hyperplane arrangement can be obtained in this way, hence it is pseudocomplemented. The lattice Reg(P, φ) carries a particularly interesting structure for special types of convex geometries, that we call closure spaces of semilattice type. For finite such closure spaces,

    • Reg(P, φ) satisfies an infinite collection of stronger and stronger quasi-identities, weaker than both meet- and join-semidistributivity. Nevertheless it may fail semidistributivity.

    • If Reg(P, φ) is semidistributive, then it is a bounded homomorphic image of a free lattice.

    • Clop(P, φ) is a lattice if and only if every regular closed set is clopen.

    The extended permutohedron R(G) on a graph G and the extended permutohedron Reg S on a join-semilattice S, are both defined as lattices of regular closed sets of suitable closure spaces. While the lattice of all regular closed sets is, in the semilattice context, always the Dedekind–MacNeille completion of the poset of clopen sets, this does not always hold in the graph context, although it always does so for finite block graphs and for cycles. Furthermore, both R(G) and Reg S are bounded homomorphic images of free lattices.

  • articleNo Access

    An upper bound for the regularity of binomial edge ideals of trees

    In this article, we obtain an improved upper bound for the regularity of binomial edge ideals of trees.

  • articleNo Access

    On the domination number of a graph and its block graph

    Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset S of V is called a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum cardinality taken over all dominating sets of G. The block graph B(G) of a graph G is a graph whose vertex set is the set of blocks in G and two vertices of B(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding blocks have a common cut vertex in G. In this paper, we investigate the lower and upper bounds for the sum of domination number of a graph and its block graph and characterize the extremal graphs.

  • articleNo Access

    Fault-tolerant strong metric dimension of graphs

    In this paper, we introduce a variant of strong metric dimension, called the fault-tolerant strong metric dimension. A strong resolving set S for G is fault-tolerant if S\{s} is also a strong resolving set, for each s in S, and the fault-tolerant strong metric dimension of G is the minimum cardinality of such a set and is denoted by dimfs(G).