Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    A Comparison of Outcomes of ‘Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tenodesis’ versus ‘No Tenodesis’ after Resection of the Distal Ulna in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor

    Background: One of the methods of stabilizing the stump of the ulna following resection of the distal ulna is tenodesis of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU). Some studies have recommended stabilization, whereas others have not found it useful. Most of these studies have a mix of different pathologies and often do not have a control group. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of ECU tenodesis versus no tenodesis after resection of the distal ulna in patients with grade III giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal ulna.

    Methods: The retrospective study included 10 patients with Campanacci grade III GCT of the distal ulna treated by resection of the distal ulna between 2014 and 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they underwent ECU tenodesis (n = 5) or no tenodesis (n = 5). The patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months for complications and outcomes using the Mayo wrist score (MWS) and the revised musculoskeletal tumor society score (MSTS).

    Results: The MWS and the MSTS were significantly better in the ECU tenodesis group at 6 weeks. At 6 months, MWS was similar in both groups, but MSTS continued to be significantly better in ECU tenodesis group. At 12 months, both groups reported similar MWS and MSTS. There were no recurrences in either groups. One patient in the ECU tenodesis group developed ECU tendonitis that resolved with conservative treatment.

    Conclusions: The outcomes of ECU tenodesis were better in the short term (6 months), although both groups reported similar outcomes at 12 months.

    Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic)

  • chapterNo Access

    THE LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF CALCIUM HYDROXYAPATITE CERAMIC IMPLANTATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF BONE TUMORS

    Bioceramics01 Oct 1999

    The purpose of this paper is to report the long-term results in patients with more than 10 years follow-up after calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic (CHA) implantation for the treatment of bone tumor surgery. Fifty-five patients were implanted with CHA for bone defects after the intralesional resection of benign bone tumors. The postoperative functional recovery was obtained within first one year in all patients. The radiographic density at the CHA implant sites appeared to increase during first 2 years, thereafter gradually decrease with time. The density at 10 years or more after operation was about one half of the maximum in some patients. No adverse effects and late complications were seen in any patients. These findings suggested strongly that CHA is useful for bone substitute to fill the defects in benign bone tumors.