Narrow Results

The article is about the state biotech and pharma industry base in Shanghai.

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relative advantages and disadvantages of first-mover hypotheses by examining the role of entry timing in the announcement effects of corporate capital investment. Our empirical results suggest that those firms first announcing their capital investment will experience greater share-price effects than the followers in the same industry. In addition, the financial analysts tend to revise upward their announcement-period earnings forecasts for those capital investment announcers, suggesting that announcements of capital investment convey positive information about the earnings prospects of the announcing firms. Furthermore, analysts' revisions of earnings forecasts subsequent to such announcements are more favorable for leading-announcer firms than the followers. Overall, our findings provide fully support for the first-mover advantages hypothesis, indicating the importance of the entry timing when announcing a corporate capital investment.

Investment in fixed assets – roads, buildings, machinery and other infrastructures – has powered China’s economy for the last two decades. It has driven success in manufacturing export markets and has transformed the physical face of China. At the same time, many commentators worry that China’s growth model relies too heavily on increasingly inefficient investments and that, as a result, its economy has become unbalanced. To sustain growth rates of 8% or higher, they argue, China must shift its economy toward consumption-led growth. While seemingly compelling, the conventional overinvestment story is misleading in certain respects. Our research shows that on some measures China may need more capital, not less. However, the key issue facing China is the distribution of capital and how it is used. In fact, investments in the right areas can stimulate household consumption and provide an entirely new source of balanced growth.