Narrow Results

We report a case of a rare injury, lateral fracture dislocation of the second and third carpometacarpal joints, which presented late and was managed by fusion of the involved joints.

Background: To assess the midterm outcome of patients under 65 who underwent anatomic pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis.

Methods: A prospective analysis was performed of a consecutive series of active patients, less than 65 years of age, with symptomatic osteoarthritis who had undergone a CMC hemiarthroplasty using a stemmed metacarpal based, anatomic pyrolytic carbon resurfacing with an additional one third flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon transfer to maintain stability.

The Wrightington Hand Score, Disability Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation Score (PRWE) were utilised. Clinical data was obtained for grip strength, pinch strength, and range of motion.

Results: The MEAN age was 57.6 years. MEAN follow up was 6.5 years. All patients had improvement in pain, grip strength and function. There was no significant difference in grip and pinch strengths between the individual’s left and right hand. All patients stated that they would undergo the procedure again. There was one revision following a traumatic trapezium fracture. One patient underwent a neurolysis of a superficial radial nerve neuroma associated with an impinging trapezial osteophyte.

Conclusions: Active patients, under 65 years of age with Eaton-Littler stage III osteoarthritis of the thumb CMC joint who are treated with anatomic pyrolytic carbon resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and stabilisation may achieve sustained improvement in pain and hand function for up to 6.5 years.

Background: Osteoarthritis of the thumb base is the second most prevalent arthritis of the hand. Management is primarily conservative, consisting of analgesia, splinting, physiotherapy, and steroid injections. Surgery is considered when conservative measures fail.

Methods: The primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of the surgical interventions and therein, evaluate whether any superiority exists among the available interventions. Efficacy was evaluated by examining four parameters: pain, function, range of movement and strength of the joint postoperatively. Safety was determined by comparing the rate and severity of postoperative complications. A systematic search of MEDLINE (2014–2019), EMBASE (2014–2019), CINAHL (2014–2019) and CENTRAL (2014–2019) databases was carried out. Abstracts were screened for relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials were only considered.

Results: Eight studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The procedures evaluated are: Trapeziectomy (T), trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (T + LR), trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI), trapeziectomy with allograft suspension (T + ALS) and joint arthrodesis (A). Low-moderate quality evidence suggests that T + LRTI yields better range of movement (palmar abduction) when compared with (T) alone; (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.00, random-effects, p = 0.002). Comparing adverse events showed that arthrodesis carries a greater risk of adverse events when compared with T + LRTI; (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.61, random-effects, p = 0.0005). In addition, T + LRTI is preferred over arthrodesis by patients (OR 0.29 95% CI 0.09 to 0.95; p = 0.04). This difference was no seen in the other comparison groups.

Conclusions: It is difficult to declare with any degree of certainty which procedure offers the best functional outcome and safety profile. Results suggest T + LRTI yields good postoperative range of movement. Arthrodesis demonstrated an unacceptably high rate of moderate-severe complications and should be considered with careful consideration.