Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    COLLECTIVE FLOW IN HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS FOR Eb=0.25-1.15GeV/NUCLEON

    The study of the various collective flows of nuclear matter is one of the main subjects in heavy ion physics. The interest in collective nuclear motion under extreme conditions, like high density and/or high temperature originates from the equation of state (EOS) of nuclear matter. We investigate the collective transverse flow in heavy ion collisions at incident energies of 0.25AGeV to 1.15AGeV for Au + Au system within the quantum molecular dynamical (QMD) model. Some preliminary results are given and discussed.

  • articleNo Access

    A critical review of RHIC experimental results

    The relativistic heavy-ion collider (RHIC) was constructed to achieve an asymptotic state of nuclear matter in heavy-ion collisions, a near-ideal gas of deconfined quarks and gluons denoted quark–gluon plasma or QGP. RHIC collisions are indeed very different from the hadronic processes observed at the Bevalac and AGS, but high-energy elementary-collision mechanisms are also non-hadronic. The two-component model (TCM) combines measured properties of elementary collisions with the Glauber eikonal model to provide an alternative asymptotic limit for A–A collisions. RHIC data have been interpreted to indicate formation of a strongly-coupled QGP (sQGP) or "perfect liquid". In this review, I consider the experimental evidence that seems to support such conclusions and alternative evidence that may conflict with those conclusions and suggest different interpretations.