Narrow Results

Knowledge Management (KM) is crucial for efficient information retrieval and forms the backbone of implementing an Information System (IS). Efficiently extracting meaningful trends from headlines aids in visualising demographic situations and addressing emergency handling needs. Understanding Information Resource Management (IRM) and Knowledge Resource Management (KRM) concepts benefits end users. This proposed KRM concept organises knowledge, ensuring global resource control through a neural decision framework. Traditional methods like Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) have higher computational steps, whereas neural network strategies in KM reduce steps and improve data prediction accuracy. The paucity of input data is a common challenge, which can be overcome by using Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) architecture for probabilistic generative processes. This research evaluates acquisition, spreading, vulnerability, and application using GAN-based knowledge systems that mitigate data scarcity through generative methods. The proposed Hierarchical Vanilla Generative Adversarial Network (HVGAN) utilises gradient functions and hierarchical computation algorithms to achieve desired knowledge extraction with lower time complexity and higher accuracy. Implementation improves efficiency in accessing stored knowledge, yielding an AUC score of 96% compared to other GAN architectures.

This paper explores the concept of organizations as complex human activity systems, through the perspectives of alternative systemic models. The impact of alternative models on perception of individual and organizational emergence is highlighted. Using information systems development as an example of management activity, individual and collective sense-making and learning processes are discussed. Their roles in relation to information systems concepts are examined. The main focus of the paper is on individual emergence in the context of organizational systems. A case is made for the importance of attending to individual uniqueness and contextual dependency when carrying out organizational analyses, e.g. information systems analysis. One particular method for contextual inquiry, the framework for Strategic Systemic Thinking, is then introduced. The framework supports stakeholders to own and control their own analyses. This approach provides a vehicle through which multiple levels of contextual dependencies can be explored and allows for individual emergence to develop.