In February of 2004, Richard Florida appeared at Detroit’s Orchestra Hall to talk about his creative class theories. Amid spotlights cutting across the sky and a packed house, it was definitely a star turn. The focus of the talk was on how any city, even Detroit, could pursue the creative class and enjoy the economic growth benefits they were purported to bring. Seventeen years later, it is time to ask the following: What about Detroit?
Detroit emerged as a model of urban-industrial decline in America, if not the world. Perhaps even more telling than the City’s 2013 bankruptcy, its economic collapse is effectively illustrated by a population exodus: a net loss of 1.25 million people since 1960, including a loss of almost a quarter million people just between the 2000 and 2010 census. Yet, following the successful resolution of the bankruptcy and new municipal leadership, the narrative has shifted to Detroit’s recovery and resilience. Detroit began to be defined as a comeback kid, a cool place for young hipsters to start businesses and buy homes, and a hotspot for tourism with a vibrant art and restaurant scene. Did the creative class save Detroit? This chapter tells a story of the efforts to attract the creative class in the world’s poster child of urban decline. In doing so, it poses and answers the following questions:
- 1. What policies has Detroit used to attract and retain the creative class and help them prosper?
- 2. What evidence is there of success in attracting creative individuals and businesses?
- 3. Has a focus on downtown amenities and the creative class positively impacted economic conditions throughout the city?
- 4. And, most importantly, what have been the racial and economic equity implications of the rise of the creative class in Detroit?