Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    The Determinants of Derivatives Use: Evidence from Non-Financial Firms in Taiwan

    This paper examines the major determinants of a firm's derivatives use for companies listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange in the period from 1997 to 1999. The study finds that the proportion of derivatives use in Taiwan, ranging from 31% to 37%, is comparable to that of the US (35%), but less than that of New Zealand (53%). Firms' derivatives use in Taiwan asymmetrically focuses on currency/forwards derivatives. Industry breakdown illustrates that the electronic industry stands for the heavy user both in terms of number and amount. We show that the vital determinants of a firm's derivatives use are size, the ratio of long-term debt to total debt, the electronic industry dummy, and the export ratio. The fact that firms' derivatives use positively correlated with size and the long-term-debt-to-total-debt ratio implies the capability-willingness hypothesis: only large firms are affordable to engage in derivatives use due to the concern of economies of scale in establishing and maintaining expertise, and these firms demand more derivatives use when they face with high financial risk in debt structure.

  • chapterNo Access

    Chapter 25: Non-Financial Firms Hedging Risks in East Asia: The Link Between Financial Derivatives Use, Firm Value and Exposures to Country Risks

    Derivatives have been used widely in the world over the last 30 years as an important risk management instrument. Although theoretical researchers suggest that derivatives usage can enhance value of a firm by alleviating costs arising from several market imperfections, the existing evidence is not quite consistent among empirical studies up to date. The purpose of this chapter, therefore, aims to examine determinants of derivatives use, a relationship between derivatives use, firm value and exposures for a sample of 881 non-financial firms in eight East Asian countries in the 2003–2013 period. The analysis is based on a novel and manually collected data.

    We find that firms in countries with lower corruption have more incentive to use financial derivatives and use derivatives with greater intensity than those firms located in highly corrupt countries. Better governance induces firms to use derivatives to hedge exposure and mitigate costs. Firms in countries with weak governance use derivatives for speculating and/or selective hedging or self-management purposes. Overall, our findings provide strong evidence of the role of countries’ governance quality in driving firms’ derivatives-related behaviors. This macro-based effect on derivatives use is independent from firm-specific factors, which are frequently invoked by hedging theories.

    Regarding relationship between firm value and derivatives use, using Tobin’s Q as a proxy of firm value, we find that low corruption level of home country (host country) induces the use of financial derivatives and rewards domestic firms and domestic MNCs (foreign affiliates) with higher value. Hedging behavior of domestic MNCs outperforms domestic firms and foreign affiliates in terms of firm value. Derivative usage is value-enhancing activity for domestic firms and domestic MNCs, but it does not add value for foreign affiliates.

    Finally, we measure exposure to home (host) country risks, and provide novel evidence that financial hedging of domestic firms and domestic MNCs reduces exposure to home country risks by 10.91% and 14.42% per 1%increase in national derivative holdings, respectively, while affiliates of foreign MNCs fail to mitigate exposure to host country risks. Domestic MNCs with derivatives activities reduce exposures of a larger magnitude than do other firms.