Processing math: 100%
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    The primeness of noncommutative polynomials on prime rings

    We study the primeness of noncommutative polynomials on prime rings. Let R be a prime ring with extended centroid C, ρ a right ideal of R, f(X1,,Xt) a noncommutative polynomial over C, which is not a polynomial identity (PI) for ρ, and a,bR{0}. Then af(x1,,xt)b=0 for all x1,,xtρ if and only if one of the following holds: (i) aρ=0; (ii) ρC=eRC for some idempotent eRC and bρC such that either f(X1,,Xt)Xt+1 is a PI for ρ or f(X1,,Xt) is central-valued on eRCe and ab=0. We then apply the result to higher commutators of right ideals. Some results of the paper are also studied from the view of point of the notion of X-primeness of rings.

  • articleNo Access

    IDEALS WHICH MEMORIZE THE EXTENDED CENTROID

    Essential ideals of multiplicatively semiprime algebras are themselves multiplicatively semiprime algebras and memorize the extended centroid.

  • articleNo Access

    COMPLEMENTEDLY DENSE IDEALS: DECOMPOSABLE ALGEBRAS

    An ideal I of a (non-associative) algebra A is dense if the multiplication algebra of A acts faithfully on I, and is complementedly dense if it is a direct summand of a dense ideal. We prove that every complementedly dense ideal of a semiprime algebra is a semiprime algebra, and determine its central closure and its extended centroid. We also prove that a semiprime algebra is an essential subdirect product of prime algebras if and only if, its extended centroid is a direct product of fields. This result is applied to discuss decomposable algebras with respect to some familiar closures for ideals.

  • articleNo Access

    Derivations with annihilator conditions on Lie ideals in prime rings

    Let R be a prime ring with characteristic different from two, d a derivation of R, L a noncentral Lie ideal of R, and aR. In the present paper, it is shown that if one of the following conditions holds: (i) a(d(uv)s(uv)t)n=0, (ii) a(d(uv)s+(uv)t)n=0, (iii) a(d(uv)s(vu)t)n=0 and (iv) a(d(uv)s+(vu)t)n=0 for all u,vL, where n,s,t are fixed positive integers, then a=0 unless R satisfies s4, the standard polynomial identity in four variables.

  • articleNo Access

    Inclusion properties of generalized inverses in semiprime rings

    Let R be a semiprime ring, not necessarily with unity, with extended centroid C. For aR, let T(a) (respectively I(a), Ref(a)) denote the set of all outer (respectively inner, reflexive) inverses of a in R. In the paper, we study the inclusion properties of T(a), I(a) and Ref(a). Among other results, we prove that for a,bR with a von Neumann regular, Ref(a)T(b) (respectively Ref(a)I(b)) if and only if a=E[a]b (respectively I(a)I(b)). Here, E[a] is the smallest idempotent in C such that E[a]a=a. This gives a common generalization of several known results.

  • articleNo Access

    Values of polynomials on centrally closed prime algebras

    Let R be a simple algebra over its extended centroid C, and let f(X1,,Xn) be a noncommutative polynomial having zero constant term. We denote by f(R)+ the additive subgroup of R generated by all elements f(x1,,xn) for xiR. It is proved that if charR=0, then f(R)+ is equal to {0}, C, [R,R], or R. As to the case charR=p>0, an example of a polynomial f satisfying [R,R]f(R)+R is given. Also, the polynomials f with f(R)+=[R,R] are characterized if charR=0 and R[R,R]. Moreover, we work on the context of centrally closed prime algebras to get more general results.

  • articleNo Access

    Generalized Derivations with Power-Central Values on Multilinear Polynomials

    Let R be a prime algebra over a commutative ring K, Z and C the center and extended centroid of R, respectively, g a generalized derivation of R, and f (X1, …,Xt) a multilinear polynomial over K. If g(f (X1, …,Xt))n ∈ Z for all x1, …, xt ∈ R, then either there exists an element λ ∈ C such that g(x)= λx for all x ∈ R or f(x1, …,xt) is central-valued on R except when R satisfies s4, the standard identity in four variables.

  • articleNo Access

    A Note on Maps Characterized by Actions on Zero Products

    Let A and B be prime rings and θ: A→ B a bijective additive map such that θ(x) θ(y)=0 for all x, y∈ A with xy=0. Suppose that the maximal right quotient ring Q(A) of A contains a nontrivial idempotent e such that eA ∪ Ae ⊆ A. Then there exists λ ∈ C(B), the extended centroid of B, such that θ(xy) = λ θ(x) θ(y) for all x, y ∈ A. This removes the assumption deg(B)≥ 3 in the recent theorem due to Chebotar, Ke and Lee.

  • articleNo Access

    Co-commutators with Generalized Derivations on Lie Ideals in Prime Rings

    Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, L a noncentral Lie ideal of R, H and G two nonzero generalized derivations of R. Suppose us(H(u)u-uG(u)) ut=0 for all u ∈ L, where s, t ≥ 0 are fixed integers. Then either (i) there exists p ∈ U such that H(x)=xp for all x ∈ R and G(x)=px for all x ∈ R unless R satisfies S4, the standard identity in four variables; or (ii) R satisfies S4 and there exist p, q ∈ U such that H(x)=px+xq for all x ∈ R and G(x)=qx+xp for all x ∈ R.

  • articleNo Access

    Engel type identities with generalized derivations in prime rings

    Let R be a noncommutative prime ring with its Utumi ring of quotients U, C=Z(U) the extended centroid of R, G a generalized derivation of R and I a nonzero ideal of R. If I satisfies any one of the following conditions:

    • (i)[[G([x,y]n), [x,y]n], G([x,y]n)]C,
    • (ii)(G(xny)(xny))G(xny)C,

    where n1 is a fixed integer, then one of the following holds:

    • (1)there exists λC such that G(x)=λx for all xR;
    • (2)R satisfies s4 and there exist aU and λC such that G(x)=ax+xa+λx for all xR;
    • (3)char (R)=2, R satisfies s4 and there exist λC and an outer derivation d of R such that G(x)=λx+d(x) for all xR.
  • articleNo Access

    Pair of generalized derivations on Lie ideals in prime rings

    Let R be a prime ring of characteristic not equal to 2, U be the Utumi quotient ring of R and C be the extended centroid of R. Let G and F be two generalized derivations on R and L be a non-central Lie ideal of R. If F(G(u))u=uG(u), for all uL, then one of the following holds :

    • (1)G=0.
    • (2)there exists λC such that F(x)=x, and G(x)=λx for all xR.
    • (3)R satisfies the standard identity s4.

  • articleNo Access

    δ-Jordan derivations of prime rings

    Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, U its Utumi quotient ring, C its extended centroid, f(x1,,xn) a noncentral multilinear polynomial over C, F and G two generalized derivations of R such that F0. We describe all possible forms of F and G in the case

    F(f(r)2)=G(F(f(r))f(r)+f(r)F(f(r)))
    for all r=(r1,,rn)Rn. In particular we prove that F must be a derivation of R unless when one of the following cases occurs:

    • (1)there exist λ,μC such that F(x)=λx, G(x)=μx, for any xR, with 2μ=1;
    • (2)f(x1,,xn)2 is central valued on R and there exist p,uU and λ,μC such that F(x)=[p,x]+λx, G(x)=[u,x]+μx for all xR, with 2μ=1.
  • articleNo Access

    Identities with b-generalized derivations and generalized skew derivations on prime rings

    Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, Qr be the right Martindale quotient ring of R, C=Z(Qr) the extended centroid of R, L be a noncentral Lie ideal of R, H and G be two nonzero b-generalized derivations of R. Suppose there exist fixed integers m,n1 such that H(um)ununG(um)=0, for all uL, then either R satisfies the standard identity s4(x1,,x4) or there is aQr such that H(x)=xa, G(x)=ax, for any xR, and one of the following holds:

    • (a)there exists aC,
    • (b)[x1,x2]m and [x1,x2]n are C-linearly dependent.

    Then, in the second part of the paper we prove a similar result in the case H and G are generalized skew derivations of R such that H(xm)xnxnG(xm)=0, for all xR.