Narrow Results

This research work focuses on implementation of the FinFET-based complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) Full Adder circuits for different transistor configurations using ASAP7 FinFET model. First, this work examines FinFET-based AND-OR-invert (AOI) gates using different topologies, and second, a FinFET-based CMOS Full Adder circuit at the 7nm technology node is analyzed with respect to its process, voltage and temperature (PVT) variability effect measured in terms of the normalized standard deviation of different performance metrics. The comparison is made between conventional (CFFA1) and proposed (FFA2, FFA3, FFA4, FFA5, FFA6, FFA7 and FFA8) FinFET-based CMOS full adder circuits. The aim is to determine the optimal design configuration of the FinFET full adder circuit with the minimum impact of PVT variability. On examining the power delay product (PDP) variability, it is found that variations in FFA2, FFA3, FFA4, FFA5, FFA6, FFA7 and FFA8 are significantly lower than CFFA1 by 6.30%, 4.68%, 10.30%, 65.48%, 68.05%, 65.61% and 17.20%, respectively. Among all the proposed configurations, normalized standard deviation $\sigma /\mu (\%)$ for the PDP metric is lowest in FFA6, followed by FFA7, FFA5, FFA8, FFA4, FFA2 and FFA3. The normalized standard deviation $\sigma /\mu (\%)$ for power dissipation, however, is lowest in FFA8. In addition, a layout comparison analysis of conventional and proposed full adder circuits reveals that FFA7 has the least area, followed by FFA8, FFA6, FFA5, FFA3, FFA4, FFA2 and CFFA1. The area of FFA2, FFA3, FFA4, FFA5 and FFA6 has decreased by 3.29%, 3.51%, 3.50%, 5.14% and 5.52%, while FFA7 and FFA8 have experienced a decrease in area by 13.87% and 14.36%, respectively, as compared to conventional CFFA1. The proposed layout of FinFET-based CMOS Full Adders can be directly transferred into the foundry’s production line for manufacturing purposes. The overall investigation led us to conclude that FFA8 is the most efficient of all due to the lowest power variation, lower delay variation and lower PDP variation, moreover it has a reduced layout area among all the discussed designs. However, there is a tradeoff in terms of penalty in nominal power, propagation delay and PDP in the proposed topologies.

The economic health of the semiconductor industry requires substantial scaling of chip power, performance, and area with every new technology node that is ramped into manufacturing in two year intervals. With no direct physical link to any particular design dimensions, industry wide the technology node names are chosen to reflect the roughly 70% scaling of linear dimensions necessary to enable the doubling of transistor density predicted by Moore’s law and typically progress as 22nm, 14nm, 10nm, 7nm, 5nm, 3nm etc. At the time of this writing, the most advanced technology node in volume manufacturing is the 14nm node with the 7nm node in advanced development and 5nm in early exploration. The technology challenges to reach thus far have not been trivial. This review addresses the past innovation in response to the device challenges and discusses in-depth the integration challenges associated with the sub-22nm non-planar finFET technologies that are either in advanced technology development or in manufacturing. It discusses the integration challenges in patterning for both the front-end-of-line and back-end-of-line elements in the CMOS transistor. In addition, this article also gives a brief review of integrating an alternate channel material into the finFET technology, as well as next generation device architectures such as nanowire and vertical FETs. Lastly, it also discusses challenges dictated by the need to interconnect the ever-increasing density of transistors.