Narrow Results

It is a common phenomenon for corporate insiders to pledge their stock as collateral for personal loans in China. Using Chinese data, this paper examines the effects of CEOs’ share pledge on the firms’ future innovation output. Evidence suggests that the existence of CEOs with share pledge has a significantly negative effect on firms’ innovation output. The baseline results are consistent with a variety of robust tests. Furthermore, we propose the effect of CEOs’ share pledge works on the corporate innovation through the market value management channel. Finally, we find that the good corporate governance is a possible channel to relieve the agency cost on CEOs.

The scholarship of entrepreneurship has identified the significance of institutional and social factors in accounting for entrepreneurial activity and firm innovation, especially in emerging economies and transitional societies. However, the lion’s share of the existent literature focuses on entrepreneurs’ characteristics and psychological traits and firms’ structures and strategies. In this study, I develop a relatively comprehensive analytic framework to study the interactive relationships between economic actors’ institutional trust, risk-taking activities and their risk-sharing with social and political actors in shaping firm innovativeness. By analyzing a nationally representative sample of Chinese private companies, I find that entrepreneurs’ legal confidence, risk-taking and risk-sharing activities are positively associated with firm innovativeness, respectively. Entrepreneurs’ risk-taking and risk-sharing activities can substitute for the role of entrepreneurs’ trust in China’s legal system in shaping firm innovativeness. Entrepreneurs’ social ties serve as the most salient factor that modulates the association between entrepreneurs’ institutional trust and innovative activities.

The effectiveness of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) on corporate performance is an area of growing interest with significant practical implications. However, the role of ESG in fostering corporate innovation has received limited attention, and the mechanisms through which ESG factors influence innovation performance remain inadequately understood. This paper empirically investigates the impact and mechanisms of ESG performance on corporate innovation capabilities using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2021. The results indicate that ESG performance significantly enhances corporate innovation capacity, mediated by the degree of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and digital transformation. By employing the concept of organisational innovation, this study elucidates the mechanisms of ESG factors on innovation performance, addressing a significant gap in the existing research. The findings offer valuable insights for enterprises aiming to improve their competitive advantage and provide a crucial foundation for policymakers seeking to enhance corporate innovation through targeted reforms.

Purpose: This study examines how social trust, as an informal institution, creates a cooperative and honest atmosphere to improve managers’ willingness for firm innovation. This study also addresses that the informal system may substitute for the formal institutions in promoting corporate innovation. Design/methodology/approach: This study opts a sample of Chinese listed firms over the period of 2007–2014. We obtain the detailed patent application information from the official website of China Patent and Intellectual Property Office. The social trust information is based on the results of Chinese Enterprise Survey System. Findings: The results indicate that firms located in regions of high social trust tend to have more innovation output, and is robust to a battery of sensitivity tests. The authors further document that this effect is more pronounced for firms with poor short-term financial performance, which are located in regions with weak legal environments and firms having lower information transparency. In addition, the authors also demonstrate that social trust can help firms to get adequate funds to reduce financial pressure and encourage firms to pay more attention to long-term benefits, alleviating investors as well as management myopia. Research limitations/implications: Limited by the data sources, when measuring innovation activity, the authors only use patent numbers represent for innovation output. Then, this study measures the patent quality through classifying patent categories (invention patent or others), since in China, the citation data are imperfect and inadequate. Practical implications: The results suggest that social trust means a good culture of honesty and cooperation can promote firm’s innovation engagement. Especially, in emerging markets, where formal mechanisms are relatively less effective, informal institutions can serve as an alternative system for alleviating information asymmetry. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, this study finds the positive effect of social trust on corporate innovation, which provides a new perspective for deepening the understanding of the influence factors of innovation. Second, this study further clarifies the mechanism of social trust promoting firm innovation, indicating that social trust can effectively alleviate outsiders’ concern about moral hazard risk. Then the stakeholders are more willing to provide financial support and pay more attention to the firm’s long-term performance.

This study investigates the impact of China’s stock market openness on corporate firm innovation. China launched Shenzhen-Hongkong and Shanghai-Hongkong Stock Connect programs to allow international investors to trade with domestic stocks. The empirical regression results demonstrate that the firms traded with foreign investors highly benefited from quality patents. In addition, the corporate firms profited from the influence of foreign investors on the firm’s innovation based on gaining financial capital, reducing information asymmetry, and efficient stock market price. Thus, our study provides robustness analysis to clarify the positive relationship between stock market openness on firm innovation.