Processing math: 100%
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleOpen Access

    FRACTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF LITHIUM DISILICATE CERAMICS AND MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA CERAMICS

    Objective: To compare the fracture mode of lithium disilicate ceramics and zirconia ceramics through a single-load-to-failure test, and reveal the cause of failure through the fractographic analysis of fracture morphology. Methods: Based on the standardized preparations, 10 IPS e.max disilicate ceramic crowns (IPCs) and 10 monolithic zirconia ceramic crowns (MZCs) were designed and fabricated. All the specimens were placed on a universal material testing machine for a single-load-to-failure test. The fracture load was recorded, and two independent sample t-tests were performed. Additionally, the type of fracture under a stereo-microscope was observed, and the morphological characteristics of the fracture with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) were investigated. Results: The fracture load of the IPC group was 1819.29±108.13N, and that of the MZC group was 4347.41±739.90N, with a statistically significant difference (t=10.69, p<0.001). The fracture types of the IPC group and the MZC group were similar, namely, types II and III. The fracture modes of the two groups were all ceramic layer fracture. Through SEM, the origin of the crack on the occlusal surface could be traced back. The crystal fracture of IPC group had a rock sugar-like pattern, and the crystal distribution of MZC group was uniform. Conclusions: Zirconia ceramics have higher fracture load and a denser crystal structure compared to lithium disilicate. Fractographic analysis method could be a better way to analyze the failure mode of single-layer porcelain materials and reveal the origin of fracture.

  • articleOpen Access

    STUDY OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND FRACTURE MODE OF ALUMINA-SILICON CARBIDE NANOCOMPOSITES

    In this study Al2O3-SiC nanocomposites have been fabricated by mixing of alumina and silicon carbide nano powders, followed by hot pressing at 1700°C. The mechanical properties and fracture mode of Al2O3-SiC nanocomposites containing different volume fractions (5, 10 and 15%) of nano scale SiC particles were investigated and compared with those of alumina. Al2O3-SiC powders were prepared by planetary milling in isopropanol. Fracture mode of specimens was investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy. Nanocomposites were tougher than alumina when they were hot pressed at the same temperature, and the values of nanocomposite's flexural strength and hardness were higher than those of alumina. Flexural strength, hardness and fracture toughness of the nanocomposites increase by increasing the volume percent of SiC up to 10% and then decrease slightly. The Scanning electron microscopy observations showed that fracture mode changes from intergranular for alumina to transgranular for nanocomposites. Finally X-ray diffraction analysis couldn't detect any chemical reactions between Al2O3 and SiC particles.