Narrow Results

The use of operative or non-operative techniques in the treatment of a volar plate avulsion fracture of the PIP joint has remained controversial. In this study, we describe the use of percutaneous K-wire fixation in 15 patients with a displaced and rotated large fragment of this injury. All processes of the technique, including reduction and interfragmental fixation, were performed with percutaneous K-wires. Mean follow-up was 14.2 months. All patients achieved bony union. Mean active motion was -1.3°/86.2° for the PIP joint and 0°/77.5° for the DIP joint and mean %TAIM was 94.6%. There were no complications. No patients complained of pain and all were able to return to their previous activity. Although this procedure is technically demanding, it reconstructs a rotated or displaced large volar plate avulsion with a low level of invasion, and achieves a satisfactory functional recovery.

To clarify the factors affecting functional results of fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 60 patients, including 38 patients with a dorsal fracture-dislocation and 22 with a pilon fracture, were analysed. The mean ratio of articular surface involvement was 48.5% and a depressed central fragment existed in 75.3% of the cases. ORIF was performed in 47 patients through a lateral approach using Kirschner wires and in 13 through a palmar approach using a plate or screws. The mean flexion, extension and range of motion (ROM) of the PIP joint was 89.5°, 11.5° and 78.0°, respectively. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that a delayed start of active motion exercise after surgery, elderly age and ulnar ray digit were factors affecting functional outcomes. Although ORIF allows accurate restoration of the articular surfaces, an early start of motion exercise is essential for good results.

Simultaneous volar dislocation of distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint and volar fracture-subluxation of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the same finger has not been reported yet. A 19-year-old man was referred due to pain on the deformed left little finger after a ball injury. Radiographs showed volar dislocation of the DIP joint and dorsal lip fracture of the middle phalanx with volar subluxation of PIP joint of the little finger. This case was unique in terms of the mechanism of injury which was hyperflexion type in two adjacent joints of the same finger. The patient was treated by closed reduction of DIP joint dislocation and open reduction and internal fixation of the PIP joint fracture-subluxation and application of dorsal external fixator due to instability. Finally, full flexion of the PIP joint and full extension of the DIP joint were obtained but with 10 degree extension lag at the PIP joint and DIP joint flexion ranging from 0 degree to 30 degrees. Some loss of motion in small joints of the fingers after hyperflexion injuries should be expected.

Background: Within hand trauma, the management of unstable, intra-articular fractures of the base of the middle phalanx remains highly controversial. The objective of this research was to determine which operation gives the best outcome in the management of displaced, intra-articular fractures of the base of the middle phalanx causing instability of the proximal interphalangeal joint.

Methods: A scoping study was performed to determine the evidence available and the terminology used. A Systematic Review was then performed along PRISMA guidelines. This Systematic Review looked specifically for papers available in English, published over the last ten years, with clinical data for at least five cases of acute unstable fractures of the base of the middle phalanx. There must be two years follow-up with less than 30% loss to follow-up.

Results: There were no Systematic Reviews or Cochrane reviews. There were no randomized controlled trials and the best studies were simply cohort studies with level III or IV evidence. There was a paucity of high quality studies, with small, heterogeneous groups, short length of follow-up and high loss to follow up. Only seven papers met the Systematic Review criteria.

Conclusions: General trends show excellent return of grip strength and good function despite some ongoing pain and stiffness. There were high complication rates for all techniques and the possible reasons for different outcomes are discussed.

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation with a plate is one of the alternative treatments for fracture–dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. However, it does not always lead to satisfactory results. The aim of this cohort study is to describe the surgical procedure and discuss the factors affecting the treatment results.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 37 cases of consecutive unstable dorsal fracture–dislocation of the PIP joint treated using a mini-plate. The volar fragments were sandwiched with a plate and dorsal cortex, and screws were used as subchondral support. The average rate of articular involvement was 55.5%. Five patients had concomitant injuries. The mean age of the patients was 40.6 years. Mean time between injury and operation was 11.1 days. The average postoperative follow-up duration was 11 months. Active ranges of motion, % total active motion (TAM) were evaluated postoperatively. The patients were divided into two groups according from Strickland score and Gaine score. Fisher’s exact test, Mann–Whitney U test and a logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the factors affecting the results.

Results: The average active flexion, flexion contracture at the PIP joint, and % TAM were 86.3°, 10.5° and 80.6%, respectively. Group I included 24 patients who had both excellent and good scores. Group II included 13 patients who had neither excellent nor good scores. When the groups were compared, there was no significant relationship between the type of fracture–dislocation and the extent of articular involvement. There were significant associations between outcomes and patient age, period from injury to surgical intervention and presence of concomitant injuries.

Conclusions: We concluded that meticulous surgical technique leads to satisfactory results. However, factors, including the patient’s age, time from injury to surgery and the presence of concomitant injuries needing adjacent joint immobilisation, contribute to unsatisfactory outcomes.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-recognised complication of after elbow trauma. The prevalence and risk factors of HO have been previously reported. However, these reports were based on elbow trauma that had undergone surgical treatment and most of them were from Western countries. This study aimed to assess the incidence of HO in patients with elbow fractures who were treated surgically and non-surgically in Japan.

Methods: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients who were treated of elbow fractures and fracture–dislocations at our institution in recent consecutive 3-year periods. We extracted patient demographics, injury mechanisms and treatment details from the medical records. Furthermore, we reviewed radiographs to classify the fracture pattern and identify the presence or absence of HO.

Results: HO was identified in 6/97 (6%) patients. Fracture–dislocation was noted in 4/6 patients. The fracture types with HO included terrible triad injury (n = 2), isolated coronoid process fractures (n = 2), distal humerus A-type fractures (n = 1) and radial head fracture (n = 1). According to the Hastings and Graham classification, HO was classified as Class I in five patients and Class II B in one patient who underwent additional surgery for HO resection.

Conclusions: The incidence of HO was relatively low in our patients. However, of the 20 conservatively treated elbows, one patient developed clinically relevant HO and required excision of HO. Even patients with elbow fractures treated conservatively should be informed of the potential risk of developing severe HO requiring surgical excision. In addition, surgeons in this region could use these data to inform patients about the risk of HO development after an elbow injury.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)