Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    DEFECTS ON THE DORSUM OF THE HAND — THE POSTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS FLAP AND ITS ALTERNATIVES

    Hand Surgery01 Dec 2003

    There are conditions that preclude the use of the posterior interosseous flap for reconstruction of the dorsum of the hand. Based on a series of 34 cases, these conditions are outlined and alternative solutions discussed.

    The posterior interosseous flap was employed for closure in 30 cases. In four cases different methods were used due to severe trauma to the wrist and distal forearm with potential impairment of the pedicle, a complex defect requiring a composite flap and an anatomical variation. Thin free flaps were employed alternatively. All flaps survived but there was marginal flap necrosis in two posterior interosseous flaps.

    The posterior interosseous flap proved its usefulness and reliability in reconstruction of the hand in this series. In four cases, free lateral arm and temporoparietal fascial flaps were employed. Flaps based on the main vessels of the forearm were not used due to their significant donor site morbidity.

  • articleNo Access

    LATERAL ARM FREE FLAPS IN THE DEFECTS OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY — A REVIEW OF 72 CASES

    Hand Surgery01 Jan 2005

    Lateral arm flaps are versatile in the use of upper extremity moderate-sized defects with little morbidity and with acceptable cosmesis. The conditions are outlined in a series of 74 lateral arm flaps performed on 72 patients and the results are given. Five patients were operated on as emergencies, 12 were operated within the first 72 hours of injury and 57 patients were treated electively. Skin defects were between 6 × 4 cm and 20 × 9 cm. Five (7%) flaps were lost due to venous thrombosis, three that sustained a high-voltage electric burn. Two other patients that were treated for a high-voltage electric burn had a successful revision of the anastomosis site in the early post-operative duration. One flap was abandoned due to very thin pedicle and obesity of the patient. A higher failure rate is encountered most frequently with the cases of high-voltage electric burn. To deal with this problem, a modified approach such as an extended approach and/or including the forearm skin to the flap is recommended during the flap harvest. For a longer pedicle to be anatomized more proximally, perforator flaps with longer pedicles may be used as an alternative.