Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
Let R be a noncommutative prime ring, with char(R)≠2,3, Qr its right Martindale quotient ring and C its extended centroid.
Suppose that F and G are generalized skew derivations of R, associated with the same automorphism α of R, and m≥1 a fixed integer. If
Let R be a noncommutative prime ring, with char(R)=p, and suppose that either p=0 or p>0 and p∤(2n−2). Let Qr be the right Martindale quotient ring of R, C its extended centroid, F a generalized skew derivation of R, m≥1 and n≥2 fixed integers. If
Let R be a prime ring with the extended centroid C, L a noncommutative Lie ideal of R and g a nonzero b-generalized derivation of R. For x,y∈R, let [x,y]=xy−yx. We prove that if [[⋯[[g(xn0),xn1],xn2],…],xnk]=0 for all x∈L, where n0,n1,…,nk are fixed positive integers, then there exists λ∈C such that g(x)=λx for all x∈R except when R⊆M2(F), the 2×2 matrix ring over a field F. The analogous result for generalized skew derivations is also described. Our theorems naturally generalize the cases of derivations and skew derivations obtained by Lanski in [C. Lanski, An Engel condition with derivation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.118 (1993), 75–80, Skew derivations and Engel conditions, Comm. Algebra42 (2014), 139–152.]
Let R be a non-commutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2 and 3, Qr its right Martindale quotient ring and C its extended centroid. Suppose that L is a non-central Lie ideal of R, F a nonzero b-generalized skew derivation of R. If
Let R be a noncommutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2, with right Martindale quotient ring Qr and extended centroid C. Let m,n≥1 be fixed integers and F a nonzero generalized skew derivation of R. In this paper, we investigate the set
Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2 and 3, Qr be its right Martindale quotient ring and C be its extended centroid. Suppose that F and G are generalized skew derivations of R, L a non-central Lie ideal of R and n ≥ 1 a fixed positive integer. Under appropriate conditions we prove that if (F(x)x – xG(x))n = 0 for all x ∈ L, then one of the following holds: (a) there exists c ∈ Qr such that F(x) = xc and G(x) = cx; (b) R satisfies s4 and there exist a, b, c ∈ Qr such that F(x) = ax + xc, G(x) = cx + xb and (a − b)2 = 0.
Let R be a ring of characteristic different from 2, m,n,s≥1 fixed positive integers, L a noncentral Lie ideal of R and F:R→R a nonzero generalized skew derivation of R.
We prove the following results: