Narrow Results

Distal radius fractures are common, and surgeons have in their armament a variety of ways of treating them. In this study, 50 orthopaedic surgeons in the UK were shown five clinical scenarios and radiographs from patients with various fracture patterns of the distal radius, and were asked for their preferred management. There was a wide variation in the preferred treatment for each scenario presented. Across all of the cases, 52% of surgeons preferred to use a volar locking-plate compared with 21% who chose fixation with Kirschner wires. There was very little consensus among surgeons with regard to the optimal method of fixation for patients sustaining dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius. This disagreement is not surprising as there is currently no high level evidence to guide surgeons as to the best management option for this common and potentially debilitating injury.

Background: Phalangeal fractures are common in hand injuries which: comprising of 23% of all hand and forearm fractures. The current consensus is that focus of treatment should be on prompt irrigation and debridement to reduce infection risk. These infections are significant as they can lead to serious sequelae including osteomyelitis. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of infection amongst patients with open fracture of distal phalanx who had been treated with K-wire fixation and the timing of their operative management compared to the UK national guideline.

Methods: We performed a retrospective case-note analysis of the patients treated for open distal phalangeal fractures at a regional hands centre over the period of 12 months, and compared with the national guidelines. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, length of time taken from injury to first washout, length of time K-wire remains in situ, and infection rate.

Results: Half of the patients (n = 19) met the guideline and were treated with washout within the first 24 hours. Infection rates in this group was 11%. This compared with 26% in those patients that did not receive washout within 24 hours.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the difficulty in always meeting national guidelines and suggests key reasons for this. The authors propose a set of local, easily-achieved interventions to raise awareness and compliance with the national guidelines and reduce infection. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of carefully selecting cases that required percutaneous K-wire fixation.

Background: A stab incision and blunt dissection prior to wire placement are believed to decrease the risk of injury to underlying structures during percutaneous pinning of distal radius fractures (DRF). However, only a few studies have compared stab incision and blunt dissection to direct wire placement. The aim of this cadaveric study is to analyse the structures at risk during percutaneous pinning of DRF and compare the two methods of wire placement.

Methods: A total of 10 cadavers (20 upper limbs) were divided into two groups of five each. Five 2.0 mm Kirschner (K)-wires were inserted into the distal radius under fluoroscopic control in a standard fashion to simulate percutaneous pinning of DRF. In group 1, the K-wires were inserted directly, whereas in group 2, the wires were inserted after making a stab incision and blunt dissection to reach the bone. Each cadaveric limb was then dissected carefully to measure the distance of the K-wires from the branches of the superficial radial nerve (SRN), the cephalic vein and the first dorsal compartment and to determine the structures injured (pierced or in close contact) by the K-wires.

Results: Out of the 100 K-wires placed, 18 wires were in close contact or pierced an underlying structure. These included 11 wires injuring tendons, six wires injuring branches of the SRN and one wire injuring the cephalic vein. Direct wire placement (group 1) resulted in injury to eight structures (44.4%) while stab incision and blunt dissection prior to wire placement (group 2) resulted in injury to 10 structures (55.5%). This difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Percutaneous pinning of DRF is associated with a high risk of injury to the extensor tendons and branches of the SRN. This risk is not reduced by making a stab incision and blunt dissection prior to K-wire placement.

Background: Percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation of hand and wrist fractures is a common trauma procedure, yet there remains little consensus on the best management of wires postoperatively. If wire’s ends are left external to the skin, it remains unknown which dressing regimen best reduces infection risk. We felt that a systematic review was required to assess the current consensus on this question within the published literature.

Methods: An electronic search was carried out across multiple databases. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers against inclusion criteria and, where necessary, full texts were reviewed. Nine eligible papers were identified, and data regarding type of procedure, dressing choice and infection rate was extracted.

Results: The included studies were widely heterogenous, and the standard of the evidence was, in general, poor. In most, dressing choice and infection incidence were not the primary intervention/outcome under study.

Conclusions: Based on the available literature, insufficient evidence exists to establish one dressing choice as having a lower infection rate. This highlights the need for further high-quality evidence in this area.

Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic)