Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

SEARCH GUIDE  Download Search Tip PDF File

  • articleNo Access

    CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA MEASUREMENT OF SOFT TISSUES IN VITRO: A NON-CONTACT LASER SCAN METHOD

    Measurements of cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of soft tissues such as tendons and ligaments allow for the evaluation of the biomechanical properties of the tissue. Underlying in vitro techniques are data reduction approaches for determining the average thickness of the tissue and the assumption of the geometry of the cross-section, i.e. circular or elliptical. However, tissue distortions, sagging, and concavities could affect the reliability of these techniques, since these features may not be accounted for adequately. To address some of the concerns faced by these techniques, a non-contact (non-destructive) laser scan technique has been developed. In this technique, a laser scans along the axis of the tissue, a coordinate measuring machine simultaneously locates the corresponding point on the tissue based on the detection of reflected (attenuated) intensity, and, finally, computerized image analysis reconstructs the morphology of the tissue. This technique was applied to patellar tendons (PTs) from New Zealand rabbits. The scanning time for each PT was less than 2 minutes. Reconstructed three-dimensional surface plots revealed microconcavities consistent with images seen under optical microscopy. CSAs of these PTs were determined for repeatability and precision; results from a conventional approach which estimated the corresponding CSAs based on the average thickness and the assumption of ellipsoidal cross-sectional geometry were also determined for the purpose of comparison. Based on the standard cuboid model, the error between the laser technique and the conventional approach was within 0.4%; the reproducibility of the laser technique was within 2%.