Narrow Results

Background: The radial and ulnar styloids as well as Lister's tubercle are important surgical landmarks in the surgical treatment of distal forearm fractures. There have been limited studies assessing their relative safety in terms of their distance from superficial nerves which are in danger during surgical procedures. The aim of this cadaveric study was to assess and compare the distance of superficial nerves to these important surgical landmarks.

Methods: Twenty embalmed cadaveric upper limbs were dissected exposing the nerves and tendons around the wrist. The radial styloid, Lister's tubercle, ulnar styloid and nerve branches were marked with pins. The distance of the nearest nerve branch to each landmark was measured with a digital calliper. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS for Windows 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) using Friedman Tests and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests.

Results: The median distance of the nearest nerve branch to the radial styloid was 5.42 mm, to the Lister's tubercle was 16.68 mm and to the ulnar styloid was 13.56 mm. There was unequal safety for these three surgical landmarks regarding proximity to nerve branches (p < 0.00001). Paired comparison using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test showed that the Lister's tubercle was safer than the radial styloid (p < 0.0001) and ulnar styloid (p = 0.04). In addition, the ulnar styloid was safer than the radial styloid (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: There is a higher risk of injury to superficial nerves when operating near the radial styloid as it is significantly closer to nerve branches as compared to Lister's tubercle and ulnar styloid.

Several techniques are used for fixation of Bennett's fractures. The aim of this study was to assess a technique of arthroscopic-assisted reduction and percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of Bennett's fractures.

Seven patients (mean age 29 years) with three fractures Type I and four fractures Type II according to Gedda were operated under arthroscopic lavage, fluoroscopic screw fixation, and arthroscopic control of the joint reduction.

Arthroscopy, showed satisfactory joint reduction in all cases. At 4.5 months, the mean pain score was 1 (0–4), QuickDASH 15 (0–61), and Kapandji score 9 (5–10). Compared to the contralateral side, first web opening was 86% (58–100), key pinch 73% (45–89), grip strength, and 85% (40–100). Four secondary displacements were noted, two of which had a step of more than 1 mm.

Our results showed that the use of arthroscopy for percutaneous screw fixation of Bennett's fractures facilitates joint reduction but does not guarantee stability of fixation.

Scaphoid fracture is the most common carpal fracture. Nonunion rate has been reported around 10 to 15% of scaphoid fractures. Risk factors for scaphoid nonunion are known as location, displacement, poor vascularity, time to treatment etc. The goals of surgical treatment for scaphoid nonunion are to achieve bony union, to correct carpal deformities and also to prevent progressive carpal instability and arthritis. Scaphoid nonunion can cause scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) which is a pattern of progressive degenerative radiocarpal and midcarpal arthritis secondary to posttraumatic pathomechanics of the scapholunate joint. Achieving bony union is essential to prevent carpal collapse or arthritis. To improve bony union, many surgical procedures including various forms of bone grafting have been developed and attempted. However, there is a controversy about which procedure is the most effective. In this review, we provide an overview of surgical treatment methods for scaphoid nonunion and discuss proper surgical strategies for scaphoid nonunion which requires surgical management.

Background: To identify acute un-displaced and minimally displaced scaphoid fractures which are unlikely to unite with non-operative treatment at six weeks with CT scan and stabilize them with percutaneous screw fixation with the aim of preventing non-union.

Methods: A scaphoid series radiographs of wrist were obtained for patients with undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures and were immobilized in a thumb spica cast for six weeks. At six weeks, CT scan was done for patients showing doubtful signs of clinical and radiographic union. Patients with a gap less than 2 mm were continued on cast for an additional two to four weeks. Those with gap more than 2 mm underwent percutaneous screw fixation. In both cases the immobilisation was discontinued when the fracture was considered to be united and mobilization was initiated.

Results: 21 out of 39 patients managed initially with cast for six weeks showed clinical and radiological evidence of union. 18 patients showed persistent tenderness of which eight showed a clear gap in radiographs and 10 patients had doubtful union. Eight of these 10 patients on CT scan showed fracture gap of more than 2 mm while two patients showed fracture gap of less than 2 mm. Hence, 16 patients underwent percutaneous fixation. Repeat radiographs showed progression to union at an average of 3.8 weeks from surgery. Remaining two eventually united on continuing the cast. All patients showed confirmed union at one year on follow up.

Conclusions: An objective measurement of fracture gap by CT scan at six weeks is useful in predicting cases with tendency for delayed union. Early percutaneous fixation of fractures would not further jeopardize the blood supply of fracture site. This aggressive conservative management also avoids unnecessary surgery in all acute scaphoid fractures.