Narrow Results

Kienbock’s disease remains a condition of uncertain etiology and our understanding about the pathogenesis is still evolving. However, a lack of consensus on the treatment is the most striking as there are wide array of treatment options described ranging from ‘doing nothing’ to a free vascularized bone graft reconstruction of the lunate. Furthermore, most treatment modalities report equivalent success rate but cumulative evidence is lacking. This ‘black hole’ in the literature presents difficulties to surgeons treating the condition and even patient’s confidence with the treatment. All the treatment options described reliably relieve pain, thus improving function and patient satisfaction. However, the disease process is not reliably altered by any of the treatment options described till date. The operative treatment chosen depends on the stage of the disease, ulnar variance, age of the patient and surgeon preference. The treatment options in early stage (before lunate collapse) aim to preserve the lunate while once the lunate is collapsed its removal is performed. The lunate preserving operations basically are either decreasing the load on the lunate to possibly permit its revascularization or are the procedures which are aimed at augmenting the vascularity of the lunate. Radius shortening osteotomy is the most popular treatment in the early stages especially in the patients’ with negative ulnar variance and the proximal row carpectomy is most popular in the advanced stages of the disease. Authors present their algorithm of management of Kienbock’s disease and discuss the various treatment options described in the literature in an attempt to find the apt in 2020.

Background: Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC) is a widespread, safe and effective salvage surgical procedure for wrist arthritis. Some authors believe that PRC results in low grip strength (GS), due to the loss of carpal height, supporting the idea to discourage PRC in high-demanding patients. Resurfacing Capitate Prosthesis Implant (RCPI) allows extending the indication for PRC also in case of deformity and/or arthritis of the head of capitate, with possible implications of clinical outcomes, including GS.

Methods: Retrospective multicentre study on a population of active workers, affected by secondary post traumatic wrist arthritis, who underwent PRC (27 patients) or PRC + RCPI (20 patients), Primary outcome was to assess GS between PRC and PRC + RCPI. Secondary outcome was to assess CHR and to search for any possible contributors to GS. Active range of motion (AROM), hand function (DASH, Work-DASH, VAS, PRWHE), pain, time to return to work, job maintenance, major complications and general satisfaction were also assessed.

Results: PRC + RCPI results in more GS maintenance compared with PRC alone, with higher values of CHR. CHR values were associated with GS with a good correlation. According to linear regression model analysis within PRC + RCPI group (GS–CHR), it is esteemed that the increase in parameter CHR is associated with an increase in parameter GS. Looking at a multiple linear regression model analysis built on the whole sample (GS% increase – (group × CHR) + GS% pre-operative). It is estimated that the increase of one unit of the GS coefficient is associated with an increase in GS% increase. Furthermore, higher pre-operative GS values positively influence post-operative GS. No differences were revealed between the two treatments in terms of the remaining secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: PRC alone and PRC + RCPI are both effective salvage procedures for wrist arthritis. RCPI provides a better GS preservation, in part due to the carpal height preservation.

Background: We report medium-term results in our case series of patients with Kienböck disease receiving a pyrocarbon lunate replacement (Integra, Smith and Nephew, Watford, UK).

Methods: Patients with Kienböck receiving a pyrocarbon lunate between September 2012 and November 2020, with stage 3b and above were included. Patients were staged preoperatively with radiographs and MRIs. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scores and movement were documented. Postoperative radiographs were obtained at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.

Results: Seven patients were identified, all female, with a median age of 28.0 years. All but one had 3b disease and the median follow-up was 2 years (range 13–112 months). A mean 9/10 preoperative VAS score improved to 1/10 by 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001, paired t-test). No major complications were seen, and implants were stable radiologically.

Conclusions: A semi-constrained pyrocarbon lunate can provide good results for patients with advanced Kienböck’s disease, offering an alternative to proximal row carpectomy salvage surgery.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)

Background: In patients with perilunate injuries (PLI) with multiple ligamentous and bony injuries involving the proximal carpal row, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can be difficult and lead to poor functional outcomes. Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is an alternative procedure that has been used for severely comminuted fractures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the long-term functional outcome (minimum 5 years) of patients that underwent an emergency PRC for PLI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent PRC at our centre between 2001 and 2016. Only patients with follow-up data of more than 5 years were included in the study. We evaluated range of motion, grip strength, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS) and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH). Radiographic analyses were performed to assess the presence of radiocarpal osteoarthritis and the space between the radius and capitate.

Results: Thirteen patients were included, with an average follow-up of 78.07 months (6.5 years). The MMWS was 65 points (four excellent and good, four fair and five poor results) and the Quick-DASH score was 30 points. X-ray analysis reported only 15.3% of patients with radiocarpal arthrosis and an average radio-capitate joint space of 1.92 mm.

Conclusions: The outcomes of PRC in the management of PLI are comparable to the results reported in literature for conventional ORIF. PRC is a simpler procedure that minimises the need for re-intervention.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)