Narrow Results

The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is the second most common site in the wrist affected by degenerative arthritis. STT fusion has been the traditional treatment for patients with isolated STT arthritis but there are concerns about the complication rate and loss of wrist movement post-surgery. The current study presents the results of an interposition arthroplasty using a scaphoid trapezium pyrocarbon implant (STPI, BIOProfile). Ten STPI's were implanted in nine patients (mean age 66, 58–76 years) with isolated STT arthritis. The mean follow-up was 16.4 (3–35) months. Following surgery, VAS pain scores improved significantly and most patients had minimal restrictions in function, with a mean DASH score of 21. The mean wrist flexion-extension arc was 126° and radioulnar deviation was 43°. Mean grip strength was 82% and pinch strength 85% compared to the non-operated side. Patients were highly satisfied with the results of their surgery (mean VAS score 9.1). No surgical complications were encountered and no significant changes in carpal alignment were noted on radiographs. The results of this study suggest that STPI interposition arthroplasty may be a good alternative to STT fusion for isolated STT arthritis.

We performed a prospective cohort comparative analysis of simple trapezectomy and trapezectomy with pyrocarbon interposition in 38 consecutive patients with trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthrosis. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at six and 12 months postoperatively using subjective and objective tools. Subjective assessment was performed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and the visual analogue score. Objective assessment was performed with grip strength measurements. At each time interval, statistical differences were sought between the two subgroups. No significant difference between the two subgroups was noted at any time interval on subjective or objective assessment. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was found on comparing the respective preoperative and 12-month subjective scores in both subgroups. Of the pyrocarbon subgroup seven had related complications. We suggest that pyrocarbon interposition does not significantly improve postoperative function, requires a longer operation with a high postoperative risk of pyrocarbon displacement and need for revision surgery.

Background: Most hand surgeons use a dorsal approach for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint implant arthroplasty. However, a volar approach offers the advantage of no disturbance to the extensor mechanism, thus allowing early initiation of active range of motion. We examined our results in patients who underwent PIP joint arthroplasty via a volar approach.

Methods: Using a retrospective chart review, we evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing PIP joint arthroplasty through a volar approach between 2001 and 2005 by 3 fellowship-trained hand surgeons at our institution. The indication for surgery was PIP joint pain with radiographic evidence of joint destruction. Variables included implant type, diagnosis, affected digit(s), preoperative and postoperative range of motion, and complications. Hand therapy was initiated on postoperative day 3 or 4.

Results: Over the 5 years, 25 PIP joints were replaced in 18 women and 2 men with the volar approach. Replacements consisted of 14 surface replacement prostheses, 9 pyrocarbon prostheses, and 2 silicone prostheses. The average age of patients at prosthesis implantation was 64 years (range, 39–75 years). Prostheses were placed in 1 index, 12 long, 7 ring, and 5 small digits. Average follow-up period was 33 months (range, 24–69 months). Preoperative diagnoses were osteoarthritis (14), rheumatoid arthritis (4), and posttraumatic arthritis (2). Preoperative total arc of motion averaged 42° (range, 0° extension to 80° flexion); postoperative total arc of motion averaged 56° (range, –10° extension to 90° flexion). Complications comprised 1 swan neck deformity, 1 deep infection, 1 dislocation (early), and 2 loose implants with flexion contractures. Seventeen patients had minimal or no pain at their last follow-up visit.

Conclusions: PIP joint arthroplasty can be successfully implemented through a volar approach with various implant types and has outcomes similiar to the published results of the dorsal approach.

Background: Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC) is a widespread, safe and effective salvage surgical procedure for wrist arthritis. Some authors believe that PRC results in low grip strength (GS), due to the loss of carpal height, supporting the idea to discourage PRC in high-demanding patients. Resurfacing Capitate Prosthesis Implant (RCPI) allows extending the indication for PRC also in case of deformity and/or arthritis of the head of capitate, with possible implications of clinical outcomes, including GS.

Methods: Retrospective multicentre study on a population of active workers, affected by secondary post traumatic wrist arthritis, who underwent PRC (27 patients) or PRC + RCPI (20 patients), Primary outcome was to assess GS between PRC and PRC + RCPI. Secondary outcome was to assess CHR and to search for any possible contributors to GS. Active range of motion (AROM), hand function (DASH, Work-DASH, VAS, PRWHE), pain, time to return to work, job maintenance, major complications and general satisfaction were also assessed.

Results: PRC + RCPI results in more GS maintenance compared with PRC alone, with higher values of CHR. CHR values were associated with GS with a good correlation. According to linear regression model analysis within PRC + RCPI group (GS–CHR), it is esteemed that the increase in parameter CHR is associated with an increase in parameter GS. Looking at a multiple linear regression model analysis built on the whole sample (GS% increase – (group × CHR) + GS% pre-operative). It is estimated that the increase of one unit of the GS coefficient is associated with an increase in GS% increase. Furthermore, higher pre-operative GS values positively influence post-operative GS. No differences were revealed between the two treatments in terms of the remaining secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: PRC alone and PRC + RCPI are both effective salvage procedures for wrist arthritis. RCPI provides a better GS preservation, in part due to the carpal height preservation.

Background: Unconstrained pyrocarbon and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to silicone implants and arthrodesis. This systematic review appraises their outcomes.

Methods: Thirty studies comprising 1,324 joints (813 pyrocarbon, 511 MoP) were included. Mean patient age was 59 years (38–78) and mean follow-up period was 54 months (12–118).

Results: There were mean improvements of 4.5 points (2–6.9) in pain visual analogue score, 10.5° (−26 to 58) in range of motion (ROM), 3.1 kg (−4 to 7) in grip strength, 0.6 kg (−1.5 to 2) in pinch strength and 18 points (−3 to 29) in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score, with no significant differences between implant types. ROM gains deteriorated over time. Clinical complications were frequent (23%) and significantly more common with pyrocarbon, as were radiographic complications. However, most were mild-moderate and did not necessarily correlate with negative outcomes or dissatisfaction. Overall re-operation rate was 21%, and revision rate 11%, both more frequent with pyrocarbon. Most revisions were within 24 months, beyond which survival was maintained up to 10 years.

Conclusions: Unconstrained PIP joint arthroplasty is effective in improving pain scores, active ROM, grip/pinch strength and patient-reported outcome measures, particularly in patients with osteoarthritis. Results are generally maintained at least to the medium term, although gains diminish in the longer term. Complication and early revision rates are high, particularly with pyrocarbon implants. Most patients express positive attitudes to arthroplasty, with significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures for both pyrocarbon and MoP implants. Patients with post-traumatic and inflammatory arthropathy are generally less satisfied. There is currently insufficient data to recommend one implant type over another, although the early-to-medium term results of MoP implants are promising. Prospective surveillance via small joint registries is recommended.

Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic)

Arthroplasty of the small joints of the hand and fingers is a complex problem facing the hand surgeon. Pyrocarbon implants have been available for several decades. They were originally thought to provide better functional outcomes than silicone implants in patients, mostly due to recreation of the joint anatomy. In a recent publication, pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthroplasty was found to have a higher complication and revision rate. We present a patient with pyrocarbon metallosis of the PIPJ in a revision arthroplasty procedure.

Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic)