If A⊆B are (commutative) rings, [A,B] denotes the set of intermediate rings and (A,B) is called an almost valuation (AV)-ring pair if each element of [A,B] is an AV-ring. Many results on AV-domains and their pairs are generalized to the ring-theoretic setting. Let R⊆S be rings, with ¯RS denoting the integral closure of R in S. Then (R,S) is an AV-ring pair if and only if both (R,¯RS) and (¯RS,S) are AV-ring pairs. Characterizations are given for the AV-ring pairs arising from integrally closed (respectively, integral; respectively, minimal) ring extensions R⊆S. If (R,S) is an AV-ring pair, then R⊆S is a P-extension. The AV-ring pairs (R,S) arising from root extensions are studied extensively. Transfer results for the “AV-ring” property are obtained for pullbacks of (B,I,D) type, with applications to pseudo-valuation domains, integral minimal ring extensions, and integrally closed maximal non-AV subrings. Several sufficient conditions are given for (R,S) being an AV-ring pair to entail that S is an overring of R, but there exist domain-theoretic counter-examples to such a conclusion in general. If (R,S) is an AV-ring pair and R⊆S satisfies FCP, then each intermediate ring either contains or is contained in ¯RS. While all AV-rings are quasi-local going-down rings, examples in positive characteristic show that an AV-domain need not be a divided domain or a universally going-down domain.