Please login to be able to save your searches and receive alerts for new content matching your search criteria.
The "supercritical pile" is a very economical GRB model that provides for the efficient conversion of the energy stored in the protons of a relativistic blast wave (RBW) into radiation and at the same time produces — in the prompt GRB phase, even in the absence of any particle acceleration — a spectral peak at an energy ~ 1 MeV. We extend this model to include also the evolution of the RBW Lorentz factor Γ and thus follow the spectral and temporal features of this model into the GRB early afterglow stage. One of the novel features of the present treatment is the inclusion of the feedback of the GRB produced radiation on the evolution of Γ with radius. This way one can obtain afterglow light curves with steep decays followed by a relatively flatter flux stage, as observed in a large number of bursts.
Computer simulations have had a profound impact on the design and understanding of past and present plasma acceleration experiments, and will be a key component for turning plasma accelerators from a promising technology into a mainstream scientific tool. In this article, we present an overview of the numerical techniques used with the most popular approaches to model plasma-based accelerators: electromagnetic particle-in-cell, quasistatic and ponderomotive guiding center. The material that is presented is intended to serve as an introduction to the basics of those approaches, and to advances (some of them very recent) that have pushed the state of the art, such as the optimal Lorentz-boosted frame, advanced laser envelope solvers and the elimination of numerical Cherenkov instability. The particle-in-cell method, which has broader interest and is more standardized, is presented in more depth. Additional topics that are cross-cutting, such as azimuthal Fourier decomposition or filtering, are also discussed, as well as potential challenges and remedies in the initialization of simulations and output of data. Examples of simulations using the techniques that are presented have been left out of this article for conciseness, and because simulation results are best understood when presented together, and contrasted with theoretical and/or experimental results, as in other articles of this volume.
The Weibel instability (and its beam-plasma counterpart: the current filamentation instability) is an electromagnetic instability that generates a magnetic field in the presence of particle phase-space anisotropies. These instabilities have been investigated in the case of ultra-intense and ultra-short laser pulses interacting with a plasma, but are also of primary importance in the astrophysical context relating to the formation (or to the seeding at small spatial scales) of magnetic fields. Here we shall investigate what are the typical spatial scales and structures of the magnetic field that can be expected to be generated by the development of the current filamentation instability.
Computer simulations have had a profound impact on the design and understanding of past and present plasma acceleration experiments, and will be a key component for turning plasma accelerators from a promising technology into a mainstream scientific tool. In this article, we present an overview of the numerical techniques used with the most popular approaches to model plasma-based accelerators: electromagnetic particle-in-cell, quasistatic and ponderomotive guiding center. The material that is presented is intended to serve as an introduction to the basics of those approaches, and to advances (some of them very recent) that have pushed the state of the art, such as the optimal Lorentz-boosted frame, advanced laser envelope solvers and the elimination of numerical Cherenkov instability. The particle-in-cell method, which has broader interest and is more standardized, is presented in more depth. Additional topics that are cross-cutting, such as azimuthal Fourier decomposition or filtering, are also discussed, as well as potential challenges and remedies in the initialization of simulations and output of data. Examples of simulations using the techniques that are presented have been left out of this article for conciseness, and because simulation results are best understood when presented together, and contrasted with theoretical and/or experimental results, as in other articles of this volume.